Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other

Jessica L Baldwin, Hardeep Singh, Dean F Sittig, Traber Davis Giardina, Jessica L Baldwin, Hardeep Singh, Dean F Sittig, Traber Davis Giardina

Abstract

Widespread use of health information technology (IT) could potentially increase patients' access to their health information and facilitate future goals of advancing patient-centered care. Despite having increased access to their health data, patients do not always understand this information or its implications, and digital health data can be difficult to navigate when displayed in a small-format, complex interface. In this paper, we discuss two forms of patient-facing health IT tools-patient portals and applications (apps)-and highlight how, despite several limitations of each, combining high-yield features of mobile health (mHealth) apps with portals could increase patient engagement and self-management and be more effective than either of them alone. Patient portal adoption is variable, and due to design and interface limitations and health literacy issues, many people find the portal difficult to use. Conversely, apps have experienced rapid adoption and traditionally have more consumer-friendly features with easy log-in access, real-time tracking, and simplified data display. These features make the applications more intuitive and easy-to-use than patient portals. While apps have their own limitations and might serve different purposes, patient portals could adopt some high-yield features and functions of apps that lead to engagement success with patients. We thus suggest that to improve user experience with future portals, developers could look towards mHealth apps in design, function, and user interface. Adding new features to portals may improve their use and empower patients to track their overall health and disease states. Nevertheless, both these health IT tools should be subjected to rigorous evaluation to ensure they meet their potential in improving patient outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest and disclosure statement

This statement accompanies the article Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other authored by Jessica L. Baldwin and co-authored by Hardeep Singh, Dean F. Sittig, Traber Davis Giardina and submitted to Healthcare as an Article Type. Authors collectively affirm that this manuscript represents original work that has not been published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere.We also affirm that all authors listed contributed significantly to the project and manuscript. Furthermore we confirm that none of our authors have disclosures and we declare noconflict of interest.

Consultant arrangements: None

Stock/other equity ownership: None

Patent licensing arrangements: None

Grants/research support: None

Employment: None

Speakers’ bureau: None

Expert witness: None.

Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:i68–i74.
    1. Singh H, Naik A, Rao R, Petersen L. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:489–494.
    1. Lazard AJ, Watkins I, Mackert MS, Xie B, Stephens KK, Shalev H. Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015.
    1. Baldwin DM, Quintela J, Duclos C, Staton EW, Pace WD. Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS collaborative. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:11.
    1. Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall TG, van de Klundert J. What do we know about developing patient portals? A systematic literature review J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015.
    1. Cohen DJ, Keller SR, Hayes GR, Dorr DA, Ash JS, Sittig DF. Developing a model for understanding patient collection of observations of daily living: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the Project HealthDesign program. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2015:91–102.
    1. Pew Research Center. Health Fact Sheet. Available from: 〈〉 [serial online] 2015; Accessed September 8, 2016.
    1. Keselman A, Smith AC. A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:1151–1163.
    1. Clain D athenaResearch Study: The Current State of Patient Portal Adoption, 2015.
    1. Garrido T, Raymond B, Wheatley B. Lessons From More Than A Decade In Patient Portals. 2016.
    1. Information on the Group Health Patient Portal. 2016.
    1. Singh H Improving Direct Notification of Abnormal Test Results via Patient Portals. Available from: 〈〉; [serial online] 2015.
    1. Jahns RG. 500m People will be Using Healthcare Mobile Applications in 2015. Available from 〈〉; [serial online] 2010; Accessed September 9, 2016.
    1. . What is a patient portal? Available from: <> [serial online] 2015; Accessed September 9, 2016.
    1. Giardina TD, Modi V, Parrish D, Singh H. The patient portal and abnormal test results: an exploratory study of patient experiences. Patient Exp J. 2016.
    1. Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015.
    1. Giardina TD, Baldwin JL, Sittig DF, Singh H. Patient Perceptions of Test Result Notification Via the Patient Portal. 2016.
    1. Giardina TD, Modi V, Parrish D, Singh H. The patient portal and abnormal test results: an exploratory study of patient experiences. Patient Exp J. 2015Article 20.
    1. Griffiths S Mobile App UX Principles: Improving User Experience And Optimising Converation. 2015.
    1. Baum S 5 Digital Health Tools That Could Improve COPD Management. Available from: 〈〉; [serial online] 2015; Accessed September 8, 2016.
    1. Versel N With STDs on the rise, Healthvana seeks to put patients at ease. 2015.
    1. Singh K, Bates D, Drouin K, Newmark LP, Rozenblum R, Lee J. Developing a framework for evaluating the patient engagement. Qual, Saf Mob Health Appl. 2016.
    1. Shaw RJ, Steinberg DM, Bonnet J, et al.Mobile health devices: will patients actually use them? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016.
    1. Weiler A mHealth and big data will bring meaning and value to patient-reported outcomes. mHealth. 2016.
    1. Hayden EC. Mobile-Phone Health Apps Deliver Data Bounty. 2016.
    1. Wicks P, Chiauzzi E. ‘Trust but veryfy’—five approaches to ensure safe medical apps. BMC Med. 2015;13:205.
    1. Schoenfeld A, Sehgal N, Auerbach A. The challenges of mobile health regulation. JAMA Intern Med. 2016.
    1. Infantino J Patient Engagement, Interoperabiltiy Needed For Mobile Health To Succeed. Available from: 〈〉; [serial online] 2014; Accessed September 1, 2016.
    1. Sarkar U, Gourley GI, Lyles CR, et al.Usability of commercially available mobile applications for diverse patients. Gen Intern Med. 2016:1–10.
    1. Powell AC, Landman AB, Bates DW. In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014;311:1851–1852.
    1. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices. Available from: 〈〉; [serial online] 2016; Accessed August 10, 2016.
    1. Terry NP. Mobile health: assessing the barriers. Chest. 2015;147:1429–1434.
    1. Sunyaev A, Dehling T, Taylor PL, Mandl KD. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22:e28–e33.
    1. Dehling T, Gao F, Schneider S, Sunyaev A. Exploring the far side of mobile health: information security and privacy of mobile health apps on iOS and android. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e8.
    1. Jutel A, Lupton D. Digitizing diagnosis: a review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process. Diagnosis. 2015;2:89–96.
    1. Hazlehurst BL, Kurtz SE, Masica A, et al.CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:763–773.
    1. Laxmisan A, Sittig DF, Pietz K, Espadas D, Krishnan B, Singh H. Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012;50:898–904.
    1. Vartian CV, Singh H, Russo E, Sittig DF. Development and field testing of a self-assessment guide for computer-based provider order entry. J Health Manag. 2014;59:338–352.
    1. Sittig DF, Kahol K, Singh H. Sociotechnical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of point-of-care mobile computing devices: a case study conducted in India. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:515–519.
    1. Keselman A, Slaughter L, Smith CA, et al.Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients’ experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:399–403.
    1. Sittig DF, Singh H, Longhurst CA. Rights and responsibilities of electronic health records (EHR) users caring for children. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2013;111:468–471.
    1. Shaw RJ, Steinberg DM, Bonnet J, et al.Mobile health devices: will patients actually use them? J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2016.
    1. Singh H, Arora NK, Street RL Jr.. A vision for using online portals for surveillance of patient-centered communication in cancer care. Patient Exp J. 2015;2:125–131.
    1. Bitton A, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Haas JS. Toward a better understanding of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20:281–283.
    1. A Method for Identifying and Evaluating Potential Patient Safety Risks in a Patient-Facing Healthcare Portal. HFES 2016 (Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care: Shaping the Future); 16 Apr 14; 2016.
    1. Bosl W, Mandel J, Jonikas M, Ramoni RB, Kohane IS, Mandl KD. Scalable decision support at the point of care: a substitutable electronic health record app for monitoring medication adherence. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2:e13.
    1. Carr DF. Apple Partners with Epic, Mayo Clinic for HealthKit. Available from: 〈〉; 2014; Accessed September 8, 2016.
    1. Campbell KR. An apple a day: changing medicine through technology and engagement. Future Cardiol. 2015;11:259–260.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi