Effect of Caffeine on Attention and Alertness Measured in a Home-Setting, Using Web-Based Cognition Tests

Wilrike J Pasman, Ruud Boessen, Yoni Donner, Nard Clabbers, André Boorsma, Wilrike J Pasman, Ruud Boessen, Yoni Donner, Nard Clabbers, André Boorsma

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing interest among nutritional researchers to perform lifestyle and nutritional intervention studies in a home setting instead of testing subjects in a clinical unit. The term used in other disciplines is 'ecological validity' stressing a realistic situation. This becomes more and more feasible because devices and self-tests that enable such studies are more commonly available. Here, we present such a study in which we reproduced the effect of caffeine on attention and alertness in an at-home setting.

Objective: The study was aimed to reproduce the effect of caffeine on attention and alertness using a Web-based study environment of subjects, at home, performing different Web-based cognition tests.

Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. Subjects were provided with coffee sachets (2 with and 2 without caffeine). They were also provided with a written instruction of the test days. Healthy volunteers consumed a cup of coffee after an overnight fast. Each intervention was repeated once. Before and 1 hour after coffee consumption subjects performed Web-based cognitive performance tests at home, which measured alertness and attention, established by 3 computerized tests provided by QuantifiedMind. Each test was performed for 5 minutes.

Results: Web-based recruitment was fast and efficient. Within 2 weeks, 102 subjects applied, of whom 70 were eligible. Of the 66 subjects who started the study, 53 completed all 4 test sessions (80%), indicating that they were able to perform the do it yourself tests, at home, correctly. The Go-No Go cognition test performed at home showed the same significant improvement in reaction time with caffeine as found in controlled studies in a metabolic ward (P=.02). For coding and N-back the second block was performed approximately 10% faster. No effect was seen on correctness.

Conclusions: The study showed that the effects of caffeine consumption on a cognition test in an at-home setting revealed similar results as in a controlled setting. The Go-No Go test applied showed improved results after caffeine intake, similar as seen in clinical trials. This type of study is a fast, reliable, economical, and easy way to demonstrate effectiveness of a supplement and is rapidly becoming a viable alternative for the classical randomized control trial to evaluate life style and nutritional interventions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02061982; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02061982 (Archived by WebCite at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02061982).

Keywords: EFSA claim; at-home testing; caffeine; cognition.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Wilrike J Pasman, Ruud Boessen, Yoni Donner, Nard Clabbers, André Boorsma. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.09.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reaction time frequencies (in ms) of the 3 cognition tests of the subjects: Coding (red), Go-NoGo (green), N-back (blue) test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ratio correct responses of total responses of the three cognitive tests on the four test days: Coding, Go-NoGo, N-back tests.

References

    1. Gimbel R, Shi L, Williams JE, Dye CJ, Chen L, Crawford P, Shry EA, Griffin SF, Jones KO, Sherrill WW, Truong K, Little JR, Edwards KW, Hing M, Moss JB. Enhancing mHealth technology in the patient-centered medical home environment to activate patients with type 2 diabetes: a multisite feasibility study protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6:e38. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6993.
    1. Swan M. Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1988.
    1. Segovia-Siapco G, Sabaté J. Using personal mobile phones to assess dietary intake in free-living adolescents: comparison of face-to-face versus telephone training. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e91. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5418.
    1. Nicholl BI, Sandal LF, Stochkendahl MJ, McCallum M, Suresh N, Vasseljen O, Hartvigsen J, Mork PJ, Kjaer P, Søgaard K, Mair FS. Digital support interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7290.
    1. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev. 2003;13:181–197.
    1. Manchester D, Priestley N, Jackson H. The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office. Brain Inj. 2004;18:1067–1081. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001672387.
    1. EFSA J. 2011. [2017-08-22]. Caffeine related health claims .
    1. Brice CF, Smith AP. Effects of caffeine on mood and performance: a study of realistic consumption. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;164:188–192. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1175-2.
    1. Fine BJ, Kobrick JL, Lieberman HR, Marlowe B, Riley RH, Tharion WJ. Effects of caffeine or diphenhydramine on visual vigilance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994;114:233–238.
    1. Warburton DM. Effects of caffeine on cognition and mood without caffeine abstinence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995;119:66–70.
    1. Haskell CF, Kennedy DO, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB. Cognitive and mood improvements of caffeine in habitual consumers and habitual non-consumers of caffeine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;179:813–825. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2104-3.
    1. Lieberman HR, Wurtman RJ, Emde GG, Roberts C, Coviella IL. The effects of low doses of caffeine on human performance and mood. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;92:308–312.
    1. Quantified-Mind. [2017-03-17].
    1. Chetverikov A, Upravitelev P. Online versus offline: the Web as a medium for response time data collection. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48:1086–1099. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0632-x.
    1. Smit HJ, Rogers PJ. Effects of low doses of caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and thirst in low and higher caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000;152:167–173.
    1. Bruce SE, Werner KB, Preston BF, Baker LM. Improvements in concentration, working memory and sustained attention following consumption of a natural citicoline-caffeine beverage. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65:1003–1007. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2014.940286.
    1. Adam LM, Manca DP, Bell RC. Can Facebook be used for research? Experiences using Facebook to recruit pregnant women for a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e250. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6404.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi