Long-term survival analysis of masitinib in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Jesus S Mora, Walter G Bradley, Delia Chaverri, María Hernández-Barral, Javier Mascias, Josep Gamez, Gisella M Gargiulo-Monachelli, Alain Moussy, Colin D Mansfield, Olivier Hermine, Albert C Ludolph, Jesus S Mora, Walter G Bradley, Delia Chaverri, María Hernández-Barral, Javier Mascias, Josep Gamez, Gisella M Gargiulo-Monachelli, Alain Moussy, Colin D Mansfield, Olivier Hermine, Albert C Ludolph

Abstract

Background: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study (AB10015) previously demonstrated that orally administered masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/day) slowed rate of functional decline, with acceptable safety, in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients having an ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) progression rate from disease onset to baseline of <1.1 points/month. Here we assess long-term overall survival (OS) data of all participants from study AB10015 and test whether a signal in OS is evident in an enriched patient population similar to that prospectively defined for confirmatory study AB19001.

Methods: Survival status of all patients originally randomized in AB10015 was collected from participating investigational sites. Survival analysis (using the multivariate log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model, with stratification factors as covariates) was performed on the intention-to-treat population and enriched subgroups, which were defined according to initial randomization, baseline ALSFRS-R progression rate and baseline disease severity.

Results: A significant survival benefit of 25 months (p = 0.037) and 47% reduced risk of death (p = 0.025) was observed for patients receiving 4.5 mg/kg/day masitinib (n = 45) versus placebo (n = 62) in an enriched cohort with ⩾2 on each baseline ALSFRS-R individual component score (i.e. prior to any complete loss or severe impairment of functionality) and post-onset ALSFRS-R progression rate <1.1 (i.e. exclusion of very fast progressors) [median OS of 69 versus 44 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI (0.31-0.92)]]. This corresponds to the population enrolled in confirmatory phase III study, AB19001.

Conclusions: Analysis of long-term OS (75 months average follow-up from diagnosis) indicates that oral masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/day) could prolong survival by over 2 years as compared with placebo, provided that treatment starts prior to severe impairment of functionality.This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02588677 (28 October 2015).

Keywords: clinical trials; masitinib; therapy; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Masitinib is under clinical development by the study funder, AB Science. AM, OH and CDM are employees and shareholders of AB Science. JSM has received research funding from AB Science. All remaining authors have no competing interests. AL, an Associate Editor of Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, is an author of this paper, therefore, the peer review process was managed by alternative members of the Board and the submitting Editor was not involved in the decision-making process.

© The Author(s), 2021.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Relationship between randomized treatment arms of study AB10015, cohorts used for the AB10015 long-term OS analysis, and subpopulations of interest for the NPP long-term OS analysis. (b) Time frame for study AB10015 long-term OS analysis showing a 75-month average duration of observation (time of diagnosis until cut-off of long-term OS analysis). LT, long term; NPP, Named Patient Program; OS, overall survival; PBO, placebo.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves from masitinib study AB10015 long-term survival analysis. (a) Overall masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/day cohort versus placebo (regardless of baseline ΔFS or individual component scores). (b) Enriched* masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/day cohort versus placebo (⩾2 on each baseline ALSFRS-R individual component score and post-onset ΔFS < 1.1).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves from masitinib NPP subgroup long-term OS analysis. (a) NPP-M4.5 versus masitinib-naïve PBO. (b) NPP-ALL versus masitinib-naïve PBO.

References

    1. Harrison JM, Rafuse VF.Muscle fiber-type specific terminal Schwann cell pathology leads to sprouting deficits following partial denervation in SOD1G93A mice. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 145: 105052.
    1. Trias E, Kovacs M, King PH, et al.. Schwann cells orchestrate peripheral nerve inflammation through the expression of CSF1, IL-34, and SCF in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Glia 2020; 68: 1165–1181.
    1. Trias E, King PH, Si Y, et al.. Mast cells and neutrophils mediate peripheral motor pathway degeneration in ALS. JCI Insight 2018; 3: e123249.
    1. Trias E, Ibarburu S, Barreto-Núñez R, et al.. Evidence for mast cells contributing to neuromuscular pathology in an inherited model of ALS. JCI Insight 2017; 2: e95934.
    1. Trias E, Ibarburu S, Barreto-Núñez R, et al.. Post-paralysis tyrosine kinase inhibition with masitinib abrogates neuroinflammation and slows disease progression in inherited amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 2016; 13: 177.
    1. Mora JS, Genge A, Chio A, et al.. Masitinib as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised clinical trial. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2020; 21: 5–14.
    1. Hermine O, Arnold V, Mansfield CD, et al.. Sensitivity analyses from the first phase 3 clinical study of masitinib (AB10015) in ALS demonstrate robustness of the positive primary analysis. Paper presented at the ENCALS Annual Meeting, 20–22June2018, Oxford, England: Abstract C35, (2018, accessed 7 July 2020).
    1. Kimura F, Fujimura C, Ishida S, et al.. Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology 2006; 66: 265–267.
    1. Labra J, Menon P, Byth K, et al.. Rate of disease progression: a prognostic biomarker in ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 628–632.
    1. Kollewe K, Mauss U, Krampfl K, et al.. ALSFRS-R score and its ratio: a useful predictor for ALS-progression. J Neurol Sci 2008; 275: 69–73.
    1. Gordon PH, Cheung YK.Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology 2006; 67: 1314–1315.
    1. Van Den Berg LH, Sorensen E, Gronseth G, et al.. Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trials. Neurology 2019; 92: e1610–e1623.
    1. Ludolph A, Drory V, Hardiman O, et al.. A revision of the El Escorial criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2015; 16: 291–292.
    1. Mitsumoto H, Brooks BR, Silani V.Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why so many negative trials and how can trials be improved? Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 1127–1138.
    1. Mora JS, Genge A, Mansfield CD, et al.. Initiation of masitinib at a less severe stage of disease produces greater treatment effect: subgroup analyses from masitinib study AB10015. Presented at the ENCALS Annual Meeting, 20–22June2018, Oxford, England: Abstract C35, (2018, accessed 7 July 2020).
    1. Writing Group; Edaravone (MCI-186) ALS 19 Study Group. Safety and efficacy of edaravone in well defined patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 505–512.
    1. Ludolph AC, Schuster J, Dorst J, et al.. Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 681–688.
    1. Ludolph AC, Dorst J, Dreyhaupt J, et al.. Effect of high-caloric nutrition on survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2020; 87: 206–216.
    1. Kwon HS, Koh SH.Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener 2020; 9: 42.
    1. Gamez J.Vall d’Hebron participates in an international study to validate masitinib for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis treatment. News, 20March, (2020, accessed 7 July 2020).
    1. Whitfield K, Huemer KH, Winter D, et al.. Compassionate use of interventions: results of a European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) survey of ten European countries. Trials 2010; 11: 104.
    1. Lortholary O, Chandesris MO, Livideanu CB, et al.. Masitinib for treatment of severely symptomatic indolent systemic mastocytosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet 2017; 389: 612–620.
    1. Zoccolella S, Beghi E, Palagano G, et al.. Analysis of survival and prognostic factors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 33–37.
    1. AB Science. AB science announces that the CHMP has adopted a negative opinion for marketing authorization of masitinib in ALS, (2018, accessed 10 May 2021).
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA.Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward. Lancet 2002; 359: 781–785.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al.. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 407–415.
    1. Dettori JR.Loss to follow-up. Evid Based Spine Care J 2011; 2: 7–10.
    1. Hardiman O, Van Den Berg LH.Edaravone: a new treatment for ALS on the horizon? Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 490–491.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi