An observational feasibility study - does early limb ergometry affect oxygen delivery and uptake in intubated critically ill patients - a comparison of two assessment methods

Olive M Wilkinson, Andrew Bates, Rebecca Cusack, Olive M Wilkinson, Andrew Bates, Rebecca Cusack

Abstract

Background: Early rehabilitation can reduce ventilation duration and improve functional outcomes in critically ill patients. Upper limb strength is associated with ventilator weaning. Passive muscle loading may preserve muscle fibre function, help recover peripheral muscle strength and improve longer term, post-hospital discharge function capacity. The physiological effects of initiating rehabilitation soon after physiological stabilisation of these patients can be concerning for clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of measuring metabolic demand and the safety and feasibility of early upper limb passive ergometry. An additional comparison of results, achieved from simultaneous application of the methods, is reported.

Methods: This was an observational feasibility study undertaken in an acute teaching hospital's General Intensive Care Unit in the United Kingdom. Twelve haemodynamically stable, mechanically ventilated patients underwent 30 minutes of arm ergometry. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were monitored. A Friedman test identified changes in physiological parameters. A metabolic cart was attached to the ventilator to measure oxygen uptake. Oxygen uptake was concurrently calculated by the reverse Fick method, utilising cardiac output from the LiDCO™ and paired mixed venous and arterial samples. A comparison of the two methods was made. Data collection began 10 minutes before ergometry and continued to recovery. Paired mixed venous and arterial samples were taken every 10 minutes.

Results: Twelve patients were studied; 9 male, median age 55 years, range (27-82), median APACHE score 18.5, range (7-31), median fraction inspired oxygen 42.5%, range (28-60). Eight patients were receiving noradrenaline. Mean dose was 0.07 mcg/kg/min, range (0.01-0.15). Early ergometry was well tolerated. There were no clinically significant changes in respiratory, haemodynamic or metabolic variables pre ergometry to end recovery. There was no significant difference between the two methods of calculating VO2 (p = 0.70).

Conclusions: We report the feasibility of using the reverse Fick method and indirect calorimetry to measure metabolic demand during early physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients. More research is needed to ascertain the most reliable method. Minimal change in metabolic demand supports the safety and feasibility of upper limb ergometry. These results will inform future study designs for further research into exercise response in critically ill patients.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT04383171. Registered on 06 May 2020 - Retrospectively registered. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Keywords: Critical care; Early rehabilitation; Physiological response.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors certify that there is no competing interest with any financial organisation regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
DO2 measurements at six different time points during 60-minute data collection period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
VCO2 measurements at six different time points during 60-minute data collection period
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
VO2 measurements from reverse Fick method at six different time points during the 60 minute data collection period
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
VO2 measurements from E-COVX at six different time points during 60-minute data collection period
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of both methods of calculating VO2 (E-COVX and Fick)

References

    1. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity 2018-19. 2019; National stastics]. Available from: .
    1. Needham DM. Mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit - Improving neuromuscular weakness and physical function. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;300(14):1685–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.14.1685.
    1. Puthucheary ZA, et al. Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;310(15):1591–600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278481.
    1. Truong AD, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: Mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit - from pathophysiology to clinical trials. Critical Care. 2009;13:4. doi: 10.1186/cc7885.
    1. Griffiths J, et al. An exploration of social and economic outcome and associated health-related quality of life after critical illness in general intensive care unit survivors: a 12-month follow-up study. Critical Care. 2013;17:3. doi: 10.1186/cc12745.
    1. Herridge MS, et al. Functional Disability 5 Years after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1293–304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
    1. Morris PE, et al. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2238–43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180b90e.
    1. Schweickert WD, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1874–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9.
    1. Burtin C, et al. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2499–505. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38937.
    1. Chiang LL, et al. Effects of physical training on functional status in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Phys Ther. 2006;86(9):1271–81. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050036.
    1. Rehal MS, et al. Measuring energy expenditure in the intensive care unit: a comparison of indirect calorimetry by E-sCOVX and Quark RMR with Deltatrac II in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Critical care (London, England) 2016;20:54. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1232-6.
    1. Black C, Grocott MPW, Singer M. Metabolic monitoring in the intensive care unit: a comparison of the Medgraphics Ultima, Deltatrac II, and Douglas bag collection methods. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(2):261–8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu365.
    1. von Elm E, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
    1. Hodgson CL, et al. Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Critical Care. 2014;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y.
    1. Schneeweiss B, et al. Assessment of oxygen-consumption by use of reverse Fick-principle and indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr. 1989;8(2):89–93. doi: 10.1016/0261-5614(89)90052-6.
    1. Takala J. Application Guide Gas Exchange and indirect calorimetry. 2013. 1–24.
    1. Collings N, Cusack R. A repeated measures, randomised cross-over trial, comparing the acute exercise response between passive and active sitting in critically ill patients. Bmc Anesthesiology, 2015. 15.
    1. Adler J, Malone D. Early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal. 2012;23(1):5–13. doi: 10.1097/01823246-201223010-00002.
    1. Stiller K, Phillips A, Lambert P. The safety of mobilisation and its effect on haemodynamic and respiratory status of intensive care patients. Physiotherapy Theory Practice. 2004;20(3):175–85. doi: 10.1080/09593980490487474.
    1. Morris PE, et al. Standardized Rehabilitation and Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016;315(24):2694–702. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7201.
    1. Routsi C, et al. Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial. Critical Care. 2010;14:2.
    1. Jolley SE, et al. Point Prevalence Study of Mobilization Practices for Acute Respiratory Failure Patients in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):205–15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002058.
    1. Gayan-Ramirez G, Decramer M. Effects of mechanical ventilation on diaphragm function and biology. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(6):1579. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00063102.
    1. Griffiths RD. Effect of passive stretching on the wasting of muscle in the critically ill: Background. Nutrition. 1997;13(1):71–3. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(96)00372-3.
    1. Llano-Diez M, et al. Mechanisms underlying ICU muscle wasting and effects of passive mechanical loading. Critical Care. 2012;16:5. doi: 10.1186/cc11841.
    1. Machado ADS, et al. Effects that passive cycling exercise have on muscle strength, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay in critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Bras Pneumol. 2017;43(2):134–9. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37562016000000170.
    1. van Willigen Z, et al., Quality improvement: The delivery of true early mobilisation in an intensive care unit. BMJ quality improvement reports, 2016. 5(1): p. u211734.w4726.
    1. Pires-Neto C. R., et al., Very early passive cycling exercise in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: physiological and safety aspects–a case series. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74182.
    1. Maeda. T, Hamaguchi E, et al. The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured bythe fourth-generationFlotracVigileo system and the Fickmethod in cardica surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:767–76. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0217-1.
    1. Berney S, Denehy L. The effect of physiotherapy treatment on oxygen consumption and haemodynamics in patients who are critically ill. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2003;49(2):99–105. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60126-4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi