Reference and point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency: Blood disorder interference, contrived specimens, and fingerstick equivalence and precision

Sampa Pal, Jane Myburgh, Pooja Bansil, Amanda Hann, Lynn Robertson, Emily Gerth-Guyette, Gwen Ambler, Greg Bizilj, Maria Kahn, Stephanie Zobrist, Michelle R Manis, Nickolas A Styke, Vajra Allan, Richard Ansbro, Tobi Akingbade, Andrew Bryan, Sean C Murphy, James G Kublin, Mark Layton, Gonzalo J Domingo, Sampa Pal, Jane Myburgh, Pooja Bansil, Amanda Hann, Lynn Robertson, Emily Gerth-Guyette, Gwen Ambler, Greg Bizilj, Maria Kahn, Stephanie Zobrist, Michelle R Manis, Nickolas A Styke, Vajra Allan, Richard Ansbro, Tobi Akingbade, Andrew Bryan, Sean C Murphy, James G Kublin, Mark Layton, Gonzalo J Domingo

Abstract

Certain clinical indications and treatments such as the use of rasburicase in cancer therapy and 8-aminoquinolines for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment would benefit from a point-of-care test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Three studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of one such test: the STANDARD™ G6PD Test (SD BIOSENSOR, South Korea). First, biological interference on the test performance was evaluated in specimens with common blood disorders, including high white blood cell (WBC) counts. Second, the test precision on fingerstick specimens was evaluated against five individuals of each, deficient, intermediate, and normal G6PD activity status. Third, clinical performance of the test was evaluated at three point-of-care settings in the United States. The test performed equivalently to the reference assay in specimens with common blood disorders. High WBC count blood samples resulted in overestimation of G6PD activity in both the reference assay and the STANDARD G6PD Test. The STANDARD G6PD Test showed good precision on multiple fingerstick specimens from the same individual. The same G6PD threshold values (U/g Hb) were applied for a semiquantitative interpretation for fingerstick- and venous-derived results. The sensitivity/specificity values (95% confidence intervals) for the test for G6PD deficiency were 100 (92.3-100.0)/97 (95.2-98.2) and 100 (95.7-100.0)/97.4 (95.7-98.5) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The same values for females with intermediate (> 30% to ≤ 70%) G6PD activity were 94.1 (71.3-99.9)/88.2 (83.9-91.7) and 82.4 (56.6-96.2)/87.6(83.3-91.2) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The STANDARD G6PD Test enables point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Correlation between the STANDARD G6PD…
Fig 1. Correlation between the STANDARD G6PD Test result and that of the reference assay as performed in the clinical laboratory.
Specimens with a white blood cell (WBC) count of > 30 x 109 cells/L are represented by the solid black circles. All other study samples are indicated by the open circles. The clinical laboratory performs WBC depletion on all specimens with WBC counts > 30 x 109 cells/L. (A) Linear regression plot for the STANDARD G6PD Test run on whole blood and the reference assay run on whole blood or depleted blood according to laboratory protocols. (B) Linear regression plot for the STANDARD G6PD Test and the reference assay, both run on whole or depleted blood according to laboratory protocols.
Fig 2. Linear correlations for STANDARD G6PD…
Fig 2. Linear correlations for STANDARD G6PD Test and reference G6PD values on contrived specimens spanning the medical decision limits.
(A) Correlation between the Pointe Scientific reagent kit run on a spectrophotometer at one laboratory (PATH, Washington, USA) and on an automated clinical chemistry analyzer at a second laboratory (University of Washington Medical Center—Northwest clinical laboratory [UWMC-NW], Washington, USA). (B) Correlation between the STANDARD G6PD Test and normalized (to percent G6PD activity) UWMC-NW laboratory reference G6PD values. Solid lines represent the linear regression fits.
Fig 3. Fingerstick precision for the STANDARD…
Fig 3. Fingerstick precision for the STANDARD G6PD Test.
Fifteen study participants with G6PD deficient, intermediate, and normal activity on the STANDARD G6PD Test were tested on both hands by two operators across four fingers (two per hand), for a total of eight STANDARD G6PD Test runs. (A) STANDARD G6PD Test results per study participant. (B) Hemoglobin test results per study participant.
Fig 4. Histogram representation of the G6PD…
Fig 4. Histogram representation of the G6PD activity distributions in (A) females and (B) males.
The reference G6PD values (U/g Hb) were normalized using the male medians and are presented here in percent activity.
Fig 5. Receiver operating characteristics for the…
Fig 5. Receiver operating characteristics for the STANDARD G6PD Test against the reference assays for G6PD in capillary specimens.
Discrimination of G6PD deficient males and females (≤ 30% G6PD activity) from females with intermediate activity and males and females with normal activity (dark blue); discrimination of females with intermediate activity (> 30% and ≤ 70% G6PD activity) from females with normal G6PD activity (red); and discrimination of females with intermediate activity (> 30% and ≤ 80% G6PD activity) from females with normal G6PD activity. (green), for (A) capillary specimens and (B) venous specimens.

References

    1. Minucci A, Moradkhani K, Hwang MJ, Zuppi C, Giardina B, Capoluongo E. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations database: review of the "old" and update of the new mutations. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2012;48(3):154–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2012.01.001
    1. Luzzatto L, Nannelli C, Notaro R. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency. Hematology/oncology clinics of North America. 2016;30(2):373–93. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.11.006
    1. Howes RE, Dewi M, Piel FB, Monteiro WM, Battle KE, Messina JP, et al.. Spatial distribution of G6PD deficiency variants across malaria-endemic regions. Malaria journal. 2013;12:418. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-418
    1. Bhutani VK, Maisels MJ, Stark AR, Buonocore G. Management of jaundice and prevention of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in infants >or = 35 weeks gestation. Neonatology. 2008;94(1):63–7. doi: 10.1159/000113463
    1. Commons RJ, McCarthy JS, Price RN. Tafenoquine for the radical cure and prevention of malaria: the importance of testing for G6PD deficiency. Med J Aust. 2020;212(4):152–3.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50474
    1. Luzzatto L, Seneca E. G6PD deficiency: a classic example of pharmacogenetics with on-going clinical implications. British journal of haematology. 2014;164(4):469–80. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12665
    1. Haston JC, Hwang J, Tan KR. Guidance for Using Tafenoquine for Prevention and Antirelapse Therapy for Malaria—United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(46):1062–8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6846a4
    1. Onori ME, Ricciardi Tenore C, Urbani A, Minucci A. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and hydroxychloroquine in the COVID-19 era: a mini review. Mol Biol Rep. 2021:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06234-y
    1. Jain SK, Parsanathan R, Levine SN, Bocchini JA, Holick MF, Vanchiere JA. The potential link between inherited G6PD deficiency, oxidative stress, and vitamin D deficiency and the racial inequities in mortality associated with COVID-19. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;161:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.10.002
    1. Jamerson BD, Haryadi TH, Bohannon A. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: An Actionable Risk Factor for Patients with COVID-19? Arch Med Res. 2020;51(7):743–4. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.006
    1. Youssef JG, Zahiruddin F, Youssef G, Padmanabhan S, Ensor J, Pingali SR, et al.. G6PD deficiency and severity of COVID19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: tip of the iceberg? Ann Hematol. 2021;100(3):667–73. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04395-1
    1. Yang HC, Ma TH, Tjong WY, Stern A, Chiu DT. G6PD deficiency, redox homeostasis, and viral infections: implications for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Free Radic Res. 2021:1–11.
    1. Roper D, Layton M, Rees D, Lambert C, Vulliamy T, De la Salle B, et al.. Laboratory diagnosis of G6PD deficiency. A British Society for Haematology Guideline. British journal of haematology. 2020;189(1):24–38. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16366
    1. Pfeffer DA, Ley B, Howes RE, Adu P, Alam MS, Bansil P, et al.. Quantification of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by spectrophotometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2020;17(5):e1003084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003084
    1. Pathologists CoA. Educational Discussion: Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD): 2015-A Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Survey (G6PD). 2015 [
    1. Peixoto HM, Brito MA, Romero GA, Monteiro WM, de Lacerda MV, de Oliveira MR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rapid diagnostic tests for G6PD deficiency in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. Malaria journal. 2016;15:82. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1140-x
    1. Vidavalur R, Bhutani VK. Economic evaluation of point of care universal newborn screening for glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in United States. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021:1–9. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1892067
    1. Devine A, Parmiter M, Chu CS, Bancone G, Nosten F, Price RN, et al.. Using G6PD tests to enable the safe treatment of Plasmodium vivax infections with primaquine on the Thailand-Myanmar border: A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017;11(5):e0005602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005602
    1. Tinley KE, Loughlin AM, Jepson A, Barnett ED. Evaluation of a rapid qualitative enzyme chromatographic test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2010;82(2):210–4. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0416
    1. Roca-Feltrer A, Khim N, Kim S, Chy S, Canier L, Kerleguer A, et al.. Field trial evaluation of the performances of point-of-care tests for screening G6PD deficiency in Cambodia. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e116143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116143
    1. Alam MS, Kibria MG, Jahan N, Thriemer K, Hossain MS, Douglas NM, et al.. Field evaluation of quantitative point of care diagnostics to measure glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. PloS one. 2018;13(11):e0206331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206331
    1. Pal S, Bansil P, Bancone G, Hrutkay S, Kahn M, Gornsawun G, et al.. Evaluation of a Novel Quantitative Test for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Bringing Quantitative Testing for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Closer to the Patient. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2018.
    1. Wong RJ, Montiel C, Kunda M, Stevenson DK, Bhutani VK. A novel point-of-care device for measuring glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme deficiency. Semin Perinatol. 2021;45(1):151356. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151356
    1. Bancone G, Chu CS, Chowwiwat N, Somsakchaicharoen R, Wilaisrisak P, Charunwatthana P, et al.. Suitability of capillary blood for quantitative assessment of G6PD activity and performances of G6PD point-of-care tests. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2015;92(4):818–24. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0696
    1. Roper DR, De la Salle B, Soni V, Fletcher K, Green JA. Abrogation of red blood cell G6PD enzyme activity through Heat treatment: development of survey material for the UK NEQAS G6PD scheme. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2017;39(3):308–16. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12627
    1. Domingo GJ, Satyagraha AW, Anvikar A, Baird K, Bancone G, Bansil P, et al.. G6PD testing in support of treatment and elimination of malaria: recommendations for evaluation of G6PD tests. Malaria journal. 2013;12:391. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-391
    1. Lacerda MVG, Llanos-Cuentas A, Krudsood S, Lon C, Saunders DL, Mohammed R, et al.. Single-Dose Tafenoquine to Prevent Relapse of Plasmodium vivax Malaria. The New England journal of medicine. 2019;380(3):215–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710775
    1. Llanos-Cuentas A, Lacerda MVG, Hien TT, Velez ID, Namaik-Larp C, Chu CS, et al.. Tafenoquine versus Primaquine to Prevent Relapse of Plasmodium vivax Malaria. The New England journal of medicine. 2019;380(3):229–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802537
    1. WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System Geneva, World Health Organization. 2011;().
    1. Luzzatto L, Ally M, Notaro R. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Blood. 2020;136(11):1225–40. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000944
    1. Chu CS, Bancone G, Kelley M, Advani N, Domingo GJ, Cutiongo-de la Paz EM, et al.. Optimizing G6PD testing for Plasmodium vivax case management and beyond: why sex, counseling, and community engagement matter. Wellcome open research. 2020;5:21. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15700.2
    1. Baird JK. Point-of-care G6PD diagnostics for Plasmodium vivax malaria is a clinical and public health urgency. BMC medicine. 2015;13:296. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0531-0
    1. Baird JK, Dewi M, Subekti D, Elyazar I, Satyagraha AW. Noninferiority of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency diagnosis by a point-of-care rapid test vs the laboratory fluorescent spot test demonstrated by copper inhibition in normal human red blood cells. Translational research: the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2015;165(6):677–88. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.09.009
    1. Yoshida A, Beutler E, Motulsky AG. Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase variants. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1971;45(2):243–53.
    1. WHO Working Group. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1989;67(6):601–11.
    1. Organization WH. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Third edition. 2015.
    1. Prequalification WHO. In vitro diagnostic medical devices to identify Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity (TSS-2) WHO PQ Diagnostics Technical Specifications Series. 2017.
    1. Zobrist S, Brito M, Garbin E, Monteiro WM, Freitas S, Macedo M, et al.. Evaluation of a point-of-care diagnostic to identify glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in Brazil. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(8):e0009649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009649
    1. Calvaresi EC, Genzen JR. Evaluating Percentage-Based Reporting of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Enzymatic Activity. American journal of clinical pathology. 2020. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa040
    1. Satyagraha AW, Sadhewa A, Panggalo LV, Subekti D, Elyazar I, Soebianto S, et al.. Genotypes and phenotypes of G6PD deficiency among Indonesian females across diagnostic thresholds of G6PD activity guiding safe primaquine therapy of latent malaria. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(7):e0009610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009610
    1. Kalnoky M, Bancone G, Kahn M, Chu CS, Chowwiwat N, Wilaisrisak P, et al.. Cytochemical flow analysis of intracellular G6PD and aggregate analysis of mosaic G6PD expression. European journal of haematology. 2018;100(3):294–303. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13013
    1. LaRue N, Kahn M, Murray M, Leader BT, Bansil P, McGray S, et al.. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative tests for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2014;91(4):854–61. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0194
    1. Powers JL, Best DH, Grenache DG. Genotype–Phenotype Correlations of Glucose-6-Phosphate–Deficient Variants Throughout an Activity Distribution. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine. 2019;2(6):841–50.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi