A randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Peru

Tanilu Grande, Andrea Bernasconi, Annette Erhart, Dioni Gamboa, Martin Casapia, Christopher Delgado, Kathy Torres, Caterina Fanello, Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas, Umberto D'Alessandro, Tanilu Grande, Andrea Bernasconi, Annette Erhart, Dioni Gamboa, Martin Casapia, Christopher Delgado, Kathy Torres, Caterina Fanello, Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas, Umberto D'Alessandro

Abstract

Background: Multi-drug resistant falciparum malaria is an important health problem in the Peruvian Amazon region. We carried out a randomised open label clinical trial comparing mefloquine-artesunate, the current first line treatment in this region, with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

Methods and findings: Between July 2003 and July 2005, 522 patients with P. falciparum uncomplicated malaria were recruited, randomized (260 with mefloquine-artesunate and 262 with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine), treated and followed up for 63 days. PCR-adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response, estimated by Kaplan Meier survival and Per Protocol analysis, was extremely high for both drugs (99.6% for mefloquine-artesunate and 98.4% and for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine) (RR: 0.99, 95%CI [0.97-1.01], Fisher Exact p = 0.21). All recrudescences were late parasitological failures. Overall, gametocytes were cleared faster in the mefloquine-artesunate group (28 vs 35 days) and new gametocytes tended to appear more frequently in patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (day 7: 8 (3.6%) vs 2 (0.9%), RR: 3.84, 95%CI [0.82-17.87]). Adverse events such as anxiety and insomnia were significantly more frequent in the mefloquine-artesunate group, both in adults and children.

Conclusion: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is as effective as mefloquine-artesunate in treating uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria but it is better tolerated and more affordable than mefloquine-artesunate (US$1.0 versus US$18.65 on the local market). Therefore, it should be considered as a potential candidate for the first line treatment of P. falciparum malaria in Peru.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00373607.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Trial profile.
Figure 1. Trial profile.
Figure 2. Proportions of patients with gametocytemia…
Figure 2. Proportions of patients with gametocytemia during the follow up.

References

    1. Navitsky RC, Witzig RS, Quintana J, Rios M, Aramburú JS, et al. In vivo resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in children of the Amazon region of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57(Suppl):229.
    1. Chauca H, Quintana J. Evaluación in vivo de la respuesta de Plasmodium falciparum a la cloroquina en foco carretera Yurimaguas-Tarapoto (Región Loreto). Rev Per Epi. 1993;6:34–9.
    1. Ministry of Health, Peru. Diresa Loreto, DIGEMID, DGSP, Proyecto VIGIA. Results of an intensive surveillance of adverse events related to the first line treatment (Mefloquine-Artesunate) for P. falciparum malaria in the Peruvian Amazon. 2004 Interne Report.
    1. Ruebush T, Neyra D, Cabezas C. El proceso de la adecuación y cambio en la política de tratamiento de la malaria por P. falciparum en el Perú, 1990–2001. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Pública. 2003;20(3):162–171.
    1. Denis M, Davis T, Hewitt S, Incardona S, Nimol K, et al. Efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (Artekin) in Cambodian children and adults with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1469–76.
    1. Karunajeewa H, Lim Ch, Hung T, Kenneth F, Denis M, et al. Safety evaluation of fixed combination piperaquine plus dihydroartemisinin (Artekin®) in Cambodian children and adults with malaria. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;57:193–99.
    1. Ashley EA, Krudsood S, Phaiphun L, Srivilairit S, McGready R, et al. Randomized, controlled dose-optimization studies of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria in Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1773–82.
    1. Tran TH, Dolecek C, Pham PM, Nguyen TD, Nguyen TT, et al. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine against multidrug resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Vietnam: randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2004;363:18–22.
    1. Mayxay M, Thongpraseuth V, Khanthavong M, Lindegardh N, Barends M, et al. An open, randomized comparison of artesunate plus mefloquine vs. dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos). Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:1157–1165.
    1. Smithuis F, Kyam Kyam M, Phe O, Htet L, Barends M, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artesunate-mefloquine in falciparum malaria: an open label randomized comparison. Lancet. 2006;367:2075–85.
    1. Janssens B, Van Herp M, Goubert L, Chan S, Uong S, et al. A randomized open study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of dihydro-artemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:251–259.
    1. Karema C, Fanello C, Van Overmeir C, Van Geertruyden JP, Van Dorend W, et al. Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (Artekin®) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwandan children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;438:1–7.
    1. Davis TM, Hung TY, Sim IK, Karunajeewa HA, Ilett KF. Piperaquine: a resurgent antimalarial drug. Drugs. 2005;65:75–87.
    1. Olliaro P, Taylor W. Developing artemisinin based drug combinations for the treatment of drug resistant falciparum malaria: A review. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:40–44.
    1. Roshanravan B, Kari E, Gilman R, Cabrera L, Lee E, et al. Endemic malaria in the Peruvian Amazon region of Iquitos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69(1):45–52.
    1. Aramburu J, Ramal C, Witzig R. Malaria re-emergence in the Peruvian Amazon region. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:209–215.
    1. Oficina General de Epidemiología. Peru. Weekly Epidemiological Bulletin. 2006 Available from . Accessed 7 June 2007.
    1. WHO. Manual of basic techniques for a health laboratory. 1980. Erythrocyte Volume Fraction. pp. 379–385. WHO Geneva Editors,
    1. Snounou G, Zhu X, Siripoon N, Jarra W, Thaithong S, et al. Biased distribution of MSP-1 and MSP-2 allelic variants in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93(4):369–74.
    1. Cattamanchi A, Kyabayinze D, Hubbard A, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G. Distinguishing recrudescence from reinfection in a longitudinal antimalarial drug efficacy study: comparison of results based on genotyping of MSP-1, MSP-2, and GLURP. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68(2):133–9.
    1. Mugittu K, Adjuik M, Snounou G, Ntoumi F, Taylor W, et al. Molecular genotyping to distinguish between recrudescents and new infections in treatment trials of Plasmodium falciparum malaria conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa: adjustment of parasitological outcomes and assessment of genotyping effectiveness. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(9):1350–1359.
    1. WHO. Assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2003 . Accessed 9 June 2007.
    1. Altman DG, Schultz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(8):663–694.
    1. Marquiño W, Huilca M, Calampa C, Falcón E, Cabezas C, et al. Efficacy of mefloquine and mefloquine-artesunate combination therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Amazon basin of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68(5):608–612.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi