Sugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

Eloi Chazelas, Bernard Srour, Elisa Desmetz, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Chantal Julia, Valérie Deschamps, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Paule Latino-Martel, Mélanie Deschasaux, Mathilde Touvier, Eloi Chazelas, Bernard Srour, Elisa Desmetz, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Chantal Julia, Valérie Deschamps, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Paule Latino-Martel, Mélanie Deschasaux, Mathilde Touvier

Abstract

Objective: To assess the associations between the consumption of sugary drinks (such as sugar sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices), artificially sweetened beverages, and the risk of cancer.

Design: Population based prospective cohort study.

Setting and participants: Overall, 101 257 participants aged 18 and over (mean age 42.2, SD 14.4; median follow-up time 5.1 years) from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort (2009-2017) were included. Consumptions of sugary drinks and artificially sweetened beverages were assessed by using repeated 24 hour dietary records, which were designed to register participants' usual consumption for 3300 different food and beverage items.

Main outcome measures: Prospective associations between beverage consumption and the risk of overall, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer were assessed by multi-adjusted Fine and Gray hazard models, accounting for competing risks. Subdistribution hazard ratios were computed.

Results: The consumption of sugary drinks was significantly associated with the risk of overall cancer (n=2193 cases, subdistribution hazard ratio for a 100mL/d increase 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.27, P<0.0001) and breast cancer (693, 1.22, 1.07 to 1.39, P=0.004). The consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was not associated with the risk of cancer. In specific subanalyses, the consumption of 100% fruit juice was significantly associated with the risk of overall cancer (2193, 1.12, 1.03 to 1.23, P=0.007).

Conclusions: In this large prospective study, the consumption of sugary drinks was positively associated with the risk of overall cancer and breast cancer. 100% fruit juices were also positively associated with the risk of overall cancer. These results need replication in other large scale prospective studies. They suggest that sugary drinks, which are widely consumed in Western countries, might represent a modifiable risk factor for cancer prevention.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03335644.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig1
Fig1
Contribution of each beverage type to the total of sugary drinks and artificially sweetened beverage consumption

References

    1. GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1345-1422. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8
    1. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Circulation 2016;133:187-225. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018585
    1. Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 2012;346:e7492 10.1136/bmj.e7492
    1. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:1084-102. 10.3945/ajcn.113.058362
    1. Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 2015;351:h3576. 10.1136/bmj.h3576
    1. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, et al. Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Adv Nutr 2017;8:793-803. 10.3945/an.117.017178
    1. Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2017;317:912-24. 10.1001/jama.2017.0947
    1. Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Lim S, Ezzati M, Mozaffarian D, Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE) Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010. Circulation 2015;132:639-66. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636
    1. Kim Y, Je Y. Prospective association of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage intake with risk of hypertension. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2016;109:242-53. 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.10.005
    1. Ruanpeng D, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Harindhanavudhi T. Sugar and artificially sweetened beverages linked to obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM 2017;110:513-20. 10.1093/qjmed/hcx068
    1. Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature 2014;514:181-6. 10.1038/nature13793
    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective . Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018.
    1. Dong J-Y, Qin L-Q. Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;126:287-94. 10.1007/s10549-011-1343-3
    1. Schlesinger S, Chan DSM, Vingeliene S, et al. Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutr Rev 2017;75:420-41. 10.1093/nutrit/nux010
    1. Laguna JC, Alegret M, Roglans N. Simple sugar intake and hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiological and mechanistic insight. Nutrients 2014;6:5933-54. 10.3390/nu6125933
    1. Choi Y, Giovannucci E, Lee JE. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2012;108:1934-47. 10.1017/S0007114512003984
    1. Smith TJS, Wolfson JA, Jiao D, et al. Caramel Color in Soft Drinks and Exposure to 4-Methylimidazole: A Quantitative Risk Assessment. 2015
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 4-Methylimidazole. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. vol. 101: Some Chemicals Present in Industrial and Consumer Products, Food and Drinking-water, pp. 447-459. 2013
    1. Nardin T, Barnaba C, Abballe F, Trenti G, Malacarne M, Larcher R. Fast analysis of quaternary ammonium pesticides in food and beverages using cation-exchange chromatography coupled with isotope-dilution high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 2017;40:3928-37. 10.1002/jssc.201700579
    1. Albero B, Sánchez-Brunete C, Tadeo JL. Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in fruit juices by matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 2003;51:6915-21. 10.1021/jf030414m
    1. European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food additive. EFSA J 2013;11:3496.
    1. Hodge AM, Bassett JK, Milne RL, English DR, Giles GG. Consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and risk of obesity-related cancers. Public Health Nutr 2018;21:1618-26. 10.1017/S1368980017002555
    1. Makarem N, Bandera EV, Lin Y, Jacques P, Hayes RB, Parekh N. Consumption of Sugars, Sugary Foods and Sugary Beverages in Relation to Adiposity-Related Cancer Risk in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;2018:19 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0218
    1. Genkinger JM, Li R, Spiegelman D, et al. Coffee, tea, and sugar-sweetened carbonated soft drink intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:305-18. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0945-T
    1. Larsson SC, Giovannucci EL, Wolk A. Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Risk of Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Cancer in a Prospective Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016;108:djw125. 10.1093/jnci/djw125
    1. Friberg E, Wallin A, Wolk A. Sucrose, high-sugar foods, and risk of endometrial cancer--a population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1831-7. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0402
    1. Navarrete-Muñoz EM, Wark PA, Romaguera D, et al. Sweet-beverage consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr 2016;104:760-8. 10.3945/ajcn.116.130963
    1. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, et al. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2018;142:1748-58. 10.1002/ijc.31198
    1. Boyle P, Koechlin A, Autier P. Sweetened carbonated beverage consumption and cancer risk: meta-analysis and review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2014;23:481-90. 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000015
    1. Hercberg S, Castetbon K, Czernichow S, et al. The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 2010;10:242. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-242
    1. Vergnaud A-C, Touvier M, Méjean C, et al. Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study. Int J Public Health 2011;56:407-17. 10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5
    1. Lassale C, Péneau S, Touvier M, et al. Validity of Web-Based Self-Reported Weight and Height: Results of the Nutrinet-Santé Study. J Med Internet Res. 2013
    1. Touvier M, Méjean C, Kesse-Guyot E, et al. Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:287-96. 10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9
    1. Touvier M, Kesse-Guyot E, Méjean C, et al. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 2011;105:1055-64. 10.1017/S0007114510004617
    1. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers. Br J Nutr 2015;113:953-62. 10.1017/S0007114515000057
    1. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Correlations between Fruit, Vegetables, Fish, Vitamins, and Fatty Acids Estimated by Web-Based Nonconsecutive Dietary Records and Respective Biomarkers of Nutritional Status. J Acad Nutr Diet 2016;116:427-38. 10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.017
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381-95. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
    1. Andreeva VA, Galan P, Julia C, Castetbon K, Kesse-Guyot E, Hercberg S. Assessment of response consistency and respective participant profiles in the Internet-based NutriNet-Santé Cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2014;179:910-6. 10.1093/aje/kwt431
    1. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Correlations between Fruit, Vegetables, Fish, Vitamins, and Fatty Acids Estimated by Web-Based Nonconsecutive Dietary Records and Respective Biomarkers of Nutritional Status.
    1. Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:1119-30. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376
    1. Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge M-P, Heymsfield SB. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;58:1479-84. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601993
    1. Rubiano F, Nuñez C, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB. Comparison of leg-to-leg bioimpedance (BIA) system with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in an eldery cohort.
    1. Austin MA, Heymsfield SB, Nieman DC. Body composition measurement in females with leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dexa.
    1. Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, et al. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1575-87. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.003.
    1. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393. 10.1136/bmj.b2393
    1. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496-509. 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144.
    1. Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks. Circulation 2016;133:601-9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719
    1. Austin PC, Fine JP. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data. Stat Med 2017;36:4391-400. 10.1002/sim.7501
    1. Kohl M, Plischke M, Leffondré K, Heinze G. PSHREG: a SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2015;118:218-33. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.11.009
    1. Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med 2010;29:1037-57. 10.1002/sim.3841
    1. Touvier M, Kesse E, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault M-C. Dual Association of beta-carotene with risk of tobacco-related cancers in a cohort of French women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1338-44. 10.1093/jnci/dji276
    1. Norat T, Chan D, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R. WCRF/AICR systematic literature review continuous Update Project Report. The Associations between Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer. Imp Coll Lond, 2010.
    1. Zamora-Ros R, Béraud V, Franceschi S, et al. Consumption of fruits, vegetables and fruit juices and differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Int J Cancer 2018;142:449-59. 10.1002/ijc.30880
    1. Wu S, Cho E, Feskanich D, et al. Citrus consumption and risk of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Carcinogenesis 2015;36:1162-8. 10.1093/carcin/bgv109
    1. Munsell CR, Harris JL, Sarda V, Schwartz MB. Parents’ beliefs about the healthfulness of sugary drink options: opportunities to address misperceptions. Public Health Nutr 2016;19:46-54. 10.1017/S1368980015000397
    1. Auerbach BJ, Dibey S, Vallila-Buchman P, Kratz M, Krieger J. Review of 100% Fruit Juice and Chronic Health Conditions: Implications for Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Policy. Adv Nutr 2018;9:78-85. 10.1093/advances/nmx006
    1. Bellisle F, Hébel P, Fourniret A, Sauvage E. Consumption of 100% Pure Fruit Juice and Dietary Quality in French Adults: Analysis of a Nationally Representative Survey in the Context of the WHO Recommended Limitation of Free Sugars. Nutrients 2018;10:E459. 10.3390/nu10040459
    1. Henning SM, Yang J, Shao P, et al. Health benefit of vegetable/fruit juice-based diet: Role of microbiome. Sci Rep 2017;7:2167. 10.1038/s41598-017-02200-6
    1. Walker RW, Dumke KA, Goran MI. Fructose content in popular beverages made with and without high-fructose corn syrup. Nutrition 2014;30:928-35. 10.1016/j.nut.2014.04.003
    1. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31:2281-3. 10.2337/dc08-1239
    1. DiMeglio DP, Mattes RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:794-800. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801229
    1. Ma J, McKeown NM, Hwang S-J, Hoffmann U, Jacques PF, Fox CS. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Is Associated With Change of Visceral Adipose Tissue Over 6 Years of Follow-Up. Circulation 2016;133:370-7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018704
    1. Maersk M, Belza A, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, et al. Sucrose-sweetened beverages increase fat storage in the liver, muscle, and visceral fat depot: a 6-mo randomized intervention study. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:283-9. 10.3945/ajcn.111.022533
    1. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest 2009;119:1322-34. 10.1172/JCI37385
    1. Doyle SL, Donohoe CL, Lysaght J, Reynolds JV. Visceral obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and cancer. Proc Nutr Soc 2012;71:181-9. 10.1017/S002966511100320X
    1. Augustin LSA, Kendall CWC, Jenkins DJA, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: An International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015;25:795-815. 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.05.005
    1. Larsson SC, Mantzoros CS, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2007;121:856-62. 10.1002/ijc.22717
    1. Lajous M, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Fabre A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Romieu I. Carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a prospective study of French women. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1384-91. 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1384
    1. Liu S, Manson JE, Buring JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ridker PM. Relation between a diet with a high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:492-8. 10.1093/ajcn/75.3.492
    1. Wang J, Lee I-M, Tworoger SS, et al. Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of breast cancer in two prospective studies and a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1199-206. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0187
    1. Fedirko V, Lukanova A, Bamia C, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, dietary carbohydrate, and dietary fiber intake and risk of liver and biliary tract cancers in Western Europeans. Ann Oncol 2013;24:543-53. 10.1093/annonc/mds434
    1. Uribarri J, Stirban A, Sander D, et al. Single oral challenge by advanced glycation end products acutely impairs endothelial function in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2579-82. 10.2337/dc07-0320
    1. HCSP. For a public health nutrition policy in France. PNNS 2017-2021. Paris: Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique; 2017.
    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Recommendations and public health and policy implications.
    1. Mostafalou S, Abdollahi M. Pesticides: an update of human exposure and toxicity. Arch Toxicol 2017;91:549-99. 10.1007/s00204-016-1849-x
    1. Soffritti M, Belpoggi F, Tibaldi E, Esposti DD, Lauriola M. Life-span exposure to low doses of aspartame beginning during prenatal life increases cancer effects in rats. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:1293-7. 10.1289/ehp.10271
    1. M S, M P, e T, et al. Sucralose administered in feed, beginning prenatally through lifespan, induces hematopoietic neoplasias in male swiss mice. Int J Occup Environ Health 2016;22:7-17. 10.1080/10773525.2015.1106075
    1. Toews I, Lohner S, Küllenberg de Gaudry D, Sommer H, Meerpohl JJ. Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 2019;364:k4718. 10.1136/bmj.k4718
    1. Andreeva VA, Salanave B, Castetbon K, et al. Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69:893-8. 10.1136/jech-2014-205263
    1. ANSES. Etude Individuelle Nationale des Consommations Alimentaires 3 (INCA 3). 2017.
    1. Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Vol. 2nd. Oxford University Press, 1998. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195122978.001.0001.
    1. Hu FB, Satija A, Rimm EB, et al. Diet Assessment Methods in the Nurses’ Health Studies and Contribution to Evidence-Based Nutritional Policies and Guidelines. Am J Public Health 2016;106:1567-72. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303348
    1. Ahluwalia N, Dwyer J, Terry A, Moshfegh A, Johnson C. Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy. Adv Nutr 2016;7:121-34. 10.3945/an.115.009258
    1. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers. Br J Nutr 2015;113:953-62. 10.1017/S0007114515000057
    1. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, Deschamps V, Vernay M, Camilleri GM, et al. Correlations between Fruit, Vegetables, Fish, Vitamins, and Fatty Acids Estimated by Web-Based Nonconsecutive Dietary Records and Respective Biomarkers of Nutritional Status. J AcadNutrDiet. 2016;116:427-38. 10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.017.
    1. Barreira TV, Harrington DM, Staiano AE, Heymsfield SB, Katzmarzyk PT. Body adiposity index, body mass index, and body fat in white and black adults. JAMA 2011;306:828-30. 10.1001/jama.2011.1189
    1. HCSP. Pour une Politique nutritionnelle de santé publique en France. PNNS 2017-2021. Paris: Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique; 2017.
    1. World Cancer Research Fund International. Building momentum: lessons on implementing a robust sugar sweetened beverage tax.
    1. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ 2016;352:h6704 10.1136/bmj.h6704.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi