Comparing performance of mothers using simplified mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) classification devices with an improved MUAC insertion tape in Isiolo County, Kenya

Angeline Grant, James Njiru, Edgar Okoth, Imelda Awino, André Briend, Samuel Murage, Saida Abdirahman, Mark Myatt, Angeline Grant, James Njiru, Edgar Okoth, Imelda Awino, André Briend, Samuel Murage, Saida Abdirahman, Mark Myatt

Abstract

Background: A novel approach for improving community case-detection of acute malnutrition involves mothers/caregivers screening their children for acute malnutrition using a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) insertion tape. The objective of this study was to test three simple MUAC classification devices to determine whether they improved the sensitivity of mothers/caregivers at detecting acute malnutrition.

Methods: Prospective, non-randomised, partially-blinded, clinical diagnostic trial describing and comparing the performance of three "Click-MUAC" devices and a MUAC insertion tape. The study took place in twenty-one health facilities providing integrated management of acute malnutrition (IMAM) services in Isiolo County, Kenya. Mothers/caregivers classified their child (n=1040), aged 6-59 months, using the "Click-MUAC" devices and a MUAC insertion tape. These classifications were compared to a "gold standard" classification (the mean of three measurements taken by a research assistant using the MUAC insertion tape).

Results: The sensitivity of mother/caregiver classifications was high for all devices (>93% for severe acute malnutrition (SAM), defined by MUAC < 115 mm, and > 90% for global acute malnutrition (GAM), defined by MUAC < 125 mm). Mother/caregiver sensitivity for SAM and GAM classification was higher using the MUAC insertion tape (100% sensitivity for SAM and 99% sensitivity for GAM) than using "Click-MUAC" devices. Younden's J for SAM classification, and sensitivity for GAM classification, were significantly higher for the MUAC insertion tape (99% and 99% respectively). Specificity was high for all devices (>96%) with no significant difference between the "Click-MUAC" devices and the MUAC insertion tape.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that, although the "Click-MUAC" devices performed well, the MUAC insertion tape performed best. The results for sensitivity are higher than found in previous studies. The high sensitivity for both SAM and GAM classification by mothers/caregivers with the MUAC insertion tape could be due to the use of an improved MUAC tape design which has a number of new design features. The one-on-one demonstration provided to mothers/caregivers on the use of the devices may also have helped improve sensitivity. The results of this study provide evidence that mothers/caregivers can perform sensitive and specific classifications of their child's nutritional status using MUAC.

Trial registrations: Clinical trials registration number: NCT02833740.

Keywords: Community management of acute malnutrition; Mid-upper arm circumference; Screening by mothers; Severe acute malnutrition.

Conflict of interest statement

The study protocol was granted ethical approval by the African Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF) Ethics and Scientific Review Committee, Kenya (ESRC number P249/2016). The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial number: NCT02833740). Consent was obtained by the data collection team in either written or verbal form and was recorded through signature or thumb prints on individual consent forms.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The three “Click-MUAC” prototypes used in the study. Devices 1 and 2 have an internal circumference of 115 mm. Device 3 has an internal circumference of either 115 mm or 125 mm depending on how the device is latched
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Features of the universal design MUAC insertion tape used in the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Age and sex distribution of the study sample. Ranges are expressed in ISO 31–11 form [A] The form (a,b] expresses the interval a

References

    1. Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates. The United Nations Children’s Fund, the World Health Organisation and the World Bank Group. Levels and trends in child malnutrition - key findings of the 2016 edition. Accessed from: on 4 May2017
    1. Hure A, Oldmeadow C, Attia J. Invited Commentary: Improving Estimates of Severe Acute Malnutrition Requires More Data. Am J Epidemiol. 2016; 15;184(12):870–872
    1. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organisation, the World Food Programme, the United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Community based management of severe acute malnutrition. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007.
    1. State of Severe Malnutrition. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017
    1. A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. World Health Organisation, United Nations Children’s Fund. Child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2009
    1. Updates on the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013..
    1. Velzeboer MI, Selwyn BJ. Sargent 2nd F, Pollitt E. Delgado H. The use of arm circumference in simplified screening for acute malnutrition by minimally trained health workers. J Trop Pediatr. 1983;29:159–166.
    1. Briend A, Dykewicz C, Graven K, Mazumder RN, Wojtyniak B, Bennish M. Usefulness of nutritional indices and classifications in predicting death of malnourished children. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;293(6543):373–375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6543.373.
    1. Pelletier DL. The relationship between child anthropometry and mortality in developing countries: implications for policy, programs and future research. J Nutr. 1994;124(Suppl 10):S2047–S2081.
    1. Myatt M, Khara T, Collins S. A review of methods to detect cases of severely malnourished children in the community for their admission into community based therapeutic care programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27:s7–s23. doi: 10.1177/15648265060273S302.
    1. Briend A, Maire B, Fontaine O, Garenne M. Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(1):130–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00340.x.
    1. Grellety E, Krause LK, Shams Eldin M, Porten K, Isanaka S. Comparison of weight-for-height and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) in a therapeutic feeding programme in South Sudan: is MUAC alone a sufficient criterion for admission of children at high risk of mortality? Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(14):2575–2581. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000737.
    1. Sachdeva S, Dewan P, Shah D, Malhotra RK, Gupta P. Mid-upper arm circumference v. weight-for-height Z-score for predicting mortality in hospitalized children under 5 years of age. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(14):2513–2520. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000719.
    1. Briend A, Zimicki S. Validation of arm circumference as an indicator of risk of death in one to four year old children. Nutr Res. 1986;6:249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(86)80129-4.
    1. Mogendi JB, De Steur H, Gellynck X, Saeed HA, Makokha A. Efficacy of mid-upper arm circumference in identification, follow-up and discharge of malnourished children during nutrition rehabilitation. Nutr Res Pract. 2015;9(3):268–277. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2015.9.3.268.
    1. Binns P, Dale N, Banda T, Banda C, Shaba B, Myatt M. Safety of using mid-upper arm circumference as a discharge criterion in community-based management of severe acute malnutrition in children aged 6–59 months. Valid International: Oxford, England; 2014.
    1. Goossens S, Bekele Y, Yun O, Harczi G, Ouannes M, Shepherd S. Mid-upper arm circumference based nutrition programming: evidence for a new approach in regions with high burden of acute malnutrition. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049320.
    1. Phelan KPQ, Lanusse C, van der Kam S, Delchevalerie P, Avril N, Hanson K. Simplifying the response to childhood malnutrition: MSF’s experience with MUAC-based (and oedema) programming. Field Exch. 2015;50:108–110. Accessed from: on 11 Nov 2017.
    1. Fernández MA, Delchevalerie P, Van Herp M. Accuracy of MUAC in the detection of severe wasting with the new WHO growth standards. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e195–e201. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2175.
    1. Sadler K, Puett C, Mothabbir G, Myatt M, 2011. Community Case Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Southern Bangladesh. Tufts University, 1–48. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017
    1. Puett C, Coates J, Alderman H, Sadler K. Quality of care for severe acute malnutrition delivered by community health workers in southern Bangladesh. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9:130–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00409.x.
    1. The Alliance for International Medical Action. Mother MUAC. Teaching Mothers to Screen for Malnutrition. Guidelines for Training of Trainers. 2016
    1. Alé F, Phelan K, Issa H, Defourny I, Le Duc G, Harczi G, Issaley K, Sayadi S, Ousmane N, Yahaya I, Myatt M, Briend A, Allafort-Duverger T, Shepherd S, Blackwell N. Mothers screening for malnutrition by mid-upper arm circumference is non-inferior to community health workers: results from a large-scale pragmatic trial in rural Niger. Arch Public Health. 2016;74(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0149-5.
    1. The Sphere Project. The Sphere Handbook, Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Management of acute malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies standard 2: Severe acute malnutrition. 2011. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017
    1. Guerrero S, Myatt M, Collins S. Determinants of coverage in community-based therapeutic care programmes: towards a joint quantitative and qualitative analysis. Disasters. 2010;34(2):571–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01144.x.
    1. Inter-Agency Standing Committee Global Nutrition Cluster. Harmonised Training Package: Resource Material for Training on Nutrition in Emergencies. Module 6 - Measuring Malnutrition: Individual Assessment. 2011. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017
    1. Blackwell N, Myatt M, Allafort-Duverger T, Balogoun A, Ibrahim A, Briend A. Mothers Understand it And Can do it (MUAC): a comparison of mothers and community health workers determining mid-upper arm circumference in 103 children aged from 6 months to 5 years. Arch of Public Health. 2015;73(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13690-015-0074-z.
    1. MUAC, Child 11.5 Red/PAC-50. UNICEF Supply Catalogue. Accessed from: on 11 Nov 2017
    1. Rao B, Roby R, LeBeau K, du Cros P, Briend A, Fritsch P, Ververs M, Myatt M. Comparing the accuracy and sensitivity of a double-sided universal MUAC strap (“uniMUAC”) with the UNICEF MUAC strap. Paper presented at Médecins Sans Frontières UK Scientific Days: Innovation 2017, London, United Kingdom, May 2017. Accessed from: on 14 Jun 2017
    1. Michaels RE, Pearce JM. 3-D printing open-source click-MUAC bands for identification of malnutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(11):2063–2066. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000726.
    1. Printing Injection Process. Alain Guelpa Concept and MP2i. Accessed from: / on 11 Nov 2017
    1. Habicht JP. Estandardizacion de metodos epidemiologicos cuantitativos sobre el terrano. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1974;76(5):375–384.
    1. Lauritsen JM, Bruus M, Myatt MA. EpiData v3.10 - A tool for validated entry, documentation, and analysis of epidemiological data. County of Funen, Denmark and Brixton Health, Llanidloes, UK, 2008
    1. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2. New York: John Wiley; 1980.
    1. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>;2-3.
    1. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna; 2017. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017
    1. Ef-Prime. R AnalyticFlow 3.1.1. Ef-prime Inc., Tokyo; 2017. Accessed from: on 4 May 2017

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi