Small volume plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome in resource poor settings: a safety and feasibility study

Md Badrul Islam, Zhahirul Islam, Shafiqur Rahman, Hubert P Endtz, Margreet C Vos, Mathieu van der Jagt, Pieter A van Doorn, Bart C Jacobs, Quazi D Mohammad, Md Badrul Islam, Zhahirul Islam, Shafiqur Rahman, Hubert P Endtz, Margreet C Vos, Mathieu van der Jagt, Pieter A van Doorn, Bart C Jacobs, Quazi D Mohammad

Abstract

Background: In Bangladesh, most patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) cannot afford standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or a standard plasma exchange (PE) course, which partly explains the high rate of mortality and residual disability associated with GBS in this country. Small volume plasma exchange (SVPE) is an affordable and potentially effective alternative form of plasma exchange. SVPE is the repeated removal of small volumes of supernatant plasma over several days via sedimentation of patient whole blood. The aim of this study is to define the clinical feasibility and safety of SVPE in patients with GBS in resource poor settings.

Methods: A total of 20 adult patients with GBS will be enrolled for SVPE at a single center in Bangladesh. Six daily sessions of whole blood sedimentation and plasma removal will be performed in all patients with GBS with a target to remove an overall volume of at least 8 liters (L) of plasma over a total of 8 days. Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined as the number of patients developing severe sepsis associated with the central venous catheter or deep venous thrombosis in the limb where the catheter is placed for SVPE. Based upon a predictive success rate of 75%, the SVPE procedure will be considered safe if less than 5 of 20 SVPE-treated GBS patients have a SAE. The procedure will be considered feasible if 8 L of plasma can be removed in at least 15 of 20 patients with GBS who receive SVPE. In addition, detailed clinical and neurological outcome assessments will be performed until discharge of the patient from the hospital and up to 4 weeks after study entry.

Discussion: This is the first clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SVPE as a potential alternative low-cost treatment for the patients with GBS in resource poor settings.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02780570.

Keywords: Feasibility; Guillain-Barré syndrome; HDU; ICU; IVIG; PE; SAE; SVPE; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the icddr,b, comprised of an Ethical Review Committee (ERC) and Research Review Committee (RRC) reviewed and approved this study protocol on 09/12/2015 (reference number: PR-15086, version no 3). In this manuscript, we did not report any human data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram for the small volume plasma exchange (SVPE) safety and feasibility study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of the small volume plasma exchange (SVPE) kit. A SVPE kit will be prepared with one blood transfusion set and two saline infusion sets connected via a tri-channel device. The blood transfusion set will be connected to the blood bag and a saline infusion set will be connected to 1 L normal saline mixed with 2500 units of unfractionated heparin and the other ends of the blood transfusion and saline infusion sets will be connected with one lumen of the central venous catheter using a tri-channel device. Another saline infusion set will be connected to 500 mL hexa-ethyl starch solution and the other end connected with the second lumen of the central venous catheter. Air should be eliminated from all tubes using fluid from the respective bags
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SVPE procedure for patients with GBS. A loading dose of low-molecular weight heparin (1.5 mg/kg) will be given subcutaneously at least 2 hours before initiation of SVPE; the same dose will be administered once daily or divided into two equal doses daily for 8 days or until SVPE is completed. Whole blood (7 mL/kg body weight) will be drawn from the central venous catheter into the blood transfusion bag in each session. The blood bag will be hung beside the patient for 2.5 h on a saline stand and left uninterrupted to allow plasma and blood cells to separate. The blood cells will be infused back into the patient and plasma will be discarded and replaced with fresh frozen plasma and colloid solution alternately (in equal volumes) via the closed-circuit SVPE kit illustrated in Fig. 2. In case of excessive clotting (bleeding time reduction of > 50% of baseline for that patient), aspirin (600 mg) will be administered orally at least 2 hours before the next SVPE session and continued thereafter at 150 mg orally/day until SVPE is completed. One blood bag will be used each day, with a total of six sessions/day. A total of 48 sessions will be performed over 8 days, removing approximately 8000 mL plasma in total

References

    1. Willison HJ, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet (London, England) 2016;388(10045):717–727. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00339-1.
    1. Van Koningsveld R, Van Doorn PA, Schmitz PI, Ang CW, Van der Meche FG. Mild forms of Guillain-Barre syndrome in an epidemiologic survey in the Netherlands. Neurology. 2000;54(3):620–625. doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.620.
    1. Asbury AK, Arnason BG, Adams RD. The inflammatory lesion in idiopathic polyneuritis: its role in pathogenesis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1969;48(3):173–215. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196905000-00001.
    1. Prineas JW. Acute idiopathic polyneuritis: an electron microscope study. Lab Investig. 1972;26(2):133–147.
    1. Islam Z, Jacobs BC, van Belkum A, Mohammad QD, Islam MB, Herbrink P, Diorditsa S, Luby SP, Talukder KA, Endtz HP. Axonal variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with Campylobacter infection in Bangladesh. Neurology. 2010;74(7):581–587. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cff735.
    1. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Efficiency of plasma exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome: role of replacement fluids. Ann Neurol. 1987;22:6:753–761.
    1. The French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Appropriate number of plasma exchanges in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:3:298–306.
    1. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Plasma exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome: one-year follow-up. Ann Neurol. 1992;32:1:94–97.
    1. The Guillain-Barre syndrome Study Group Plasmapheresis and acute Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 1985;35(8):1096–1104. doi: 10.1212/WNL.35.8.1096.
    1. Greenwood RJ, Newsom-Davis J, Hughes RA, Aslan S, Bowden AN, Chadwick DW, Gordon NS, McLellan DL, Millac P, Stott RB, et al. Controlled trial of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet (London, England) 1984;1(8382):877–879. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91341-2.
    1. Osterman PO, Fagius J, Lundemo G, Pihlstedt P, Pirskanen R, Siden A, Safwenberg J. Beneficial effects of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet (London, England) 1984;2(8415):1296–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90819-5.
    1. Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Doorn PA. Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:Cd002063.
    1. Visser LH, Schmitz PI, Meulstee J, van Doorn PA, van der Meche FG. Prognostic factors of Guillain-Barre syndrome after intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Dutch Guillain-Barre Study Group. Neurology. 1999;53(3):598–604. doi: 10.1212/WNL.53.3.598.
    1. Hughes RA, Swan AV, Raphael JC, Annane D, van Koningsveld R, van Doorn PA. Immunotherapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 9):2245–2257. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm004.
    1. van Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):939–950. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1.
    1. Kiprov DD, Golden P, Rohe R, Smith S, Hofmann J, Hunnicutt J. Adverse reactions associated with mobile therapeutic apheresis: analysis of 17,940 procedures. J Clin Apher. 2001;16(3):130–133. doi: 10.1002/jca.1024.
    1. Hughes RA, Wijdicks EF, Barohn R, Benson E, Cornblath DR, Hahn AF, Meythaler JM, Miller RG, Sladky JT, Stevens JC. Practice parameter: immunotherapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;61(6):736–740. doi: 10.1212/WNL.61.6.736.
    1. van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Dutch Guillain-Barre Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(17):1123–1129. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204233261705.
    1. Islam MB, Islam Z, Farzana KS, Sarker SK, Endtz HP, Mohammad QD, Jacobs BC. Guillain-Barre syndrome in Bangladesh: validation of Brighton criteria. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2016;21(4):345–351. doi: 10.1111/jns.12189.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310(20):2191–94.
    1. Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(Suppl):S21–S24. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270707.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bloodstream Infection Event (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection and Non-central line-associated Bloodstream Infection). 2017. . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin GD, Pierce JM. Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet (London, England) 1978;2(8093):750–753. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92644-2.
    1. Kleyweg RP, van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14(11):1103–1109. doi: 10.1002/mus.880141111.
    1. Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Colantuoni E, Watson S, Lubomski LH, Berenholtz SM, Thompson DA, Sinopoli DJ, Cosgrove S, Sexton JB, et al. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ. 2010;340:c309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c309.
    1. Flodgren G, Conterno LO, Mayhew A, Omar O, Pereira CR, Shepperd S. Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:Cd006559.
    1. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, et al. Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):1087–1099. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir138.
    1. WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. (WHO/NMH/NHD/MNM/11.1). . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) and Other Urinary System Infection [USI]) Events. 2017. . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Pneumonia (Ventilator-associated [VAP] and non-ventilator-associated Pneumonia [PNEU]) Event. 2017. . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI) for CDC/NHSN Surveillance. 2017. . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions for Specific Types of Infections. 2017. . Accessed 26 Sept 2017.
    1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(13):1227–1235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023153.
    1. The Dutch Guillain-Barre Study Group Treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome with high-dose immune globulins combined with methylprednisolone: a pilot study. Ann Neurol. 1994;35(6):749–752. doi: 10.1002/ana.410350618.
    1. Garssen MP, van Koningsveld R, van Doorn PA, Merkies IS, Scheltens-de Boer M, van Leusden JA, van Schaik IN, Linssen WH, Visscher F, Boon AM, et al. Treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome with mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(9):1012–1013. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.102731.
    1. Stigler SM. The true title of Bayes’s essay. Stat Sci. 2013; doi:10.1214/13-STS438.28:3:283-288.
    1. Freedman LS, Spiegelhalter DJ, Parmar MK. The what, why and how of Bayesian clinical trials monitoring. Stat Med. 1994;13(13–14):1371–1383. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131312.
    1. Resnic FS, Zou KH, Do DV, Apostolakis G, Ohno-Machado L. Exploration of a Bayesian updating methodology to monitor the safety of interventional cardiovascular procedures. Med Decis Mak. 2004;24(4):399–407. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04267012.
    1. Rosenthal VD, Bijie H, Maki DG, Mehta Y, Apisarnthanarak A, Medeiros EA, Leblebicioglu H, Fisher D, Alvarez-Moreno C, Khader IA, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 36 countries, for 2004-2009. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(5):396–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.05.020.
    1. Datta P, Rani H, Chauhan R, Gombar S, Chander J. Device-associated nosocomial infection in the intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in northern India. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76(2):184–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.06.013.
    1. Pawar M, Mehta Y, Kapoor P, Sharma J, Gupta A, Trehan N. Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections: incidence, risk factors, outcome, and associated pathogens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(3):304–308. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.009.
    1. Chopdekar K, Chande C, Chavan S, Veer P, Wabale V, Vishwakarma K, Joshi A. Central venous catheter-related blood stream infection rate in critical care units in a tertiary care, teaching hospital in Mumbai. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29(2):169–171. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.81796.
    1. Kaur R, Mathai AS, Abraham J. Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous catheterizations in a tertiary-level intensive care unit in northern India. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;564:376–381.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi