The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability

Abdullah Saleh Almutairi, Maher Abdullatif Walid, Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary, Abdullah Saleh Almutairi, Maher Abdullatif Walid, Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to achieve good primary stability of dental implants in soft bone, such as that in the posterior maxillae. Osseodensification (OD) burs, working in a non-subtractive fashion, condense the implant osteotomy bone in lateral direction and increase in the bone implant contact. Also, dental implants with deeper threads, and decreased thread pitch can increase initial bone implant anchorage. Methods: This study utilized 48 custom-made machined surface dental implants that were 13 mm long, with a major diameter of 4.5 mm and a minor diameter of 3.5 mm, a thread pitch of 1 mm, a thread depth of 0.5 mm, and a 4 mm long cutting flute at the apex. The implants were divided into 4 groups, each group was made of 12 implants with a different thread design; V-shaped, trapezoid, buttress, and reverse buttress. The implants were inserted in 4-mm thick cancellous bone slices obtained from the head of Cow femur bone. The ostoetomies were prepared by conventional drilling and by OD drilling. Each inserted implant was then tested for primary stability using the Periotest. The Periotest values (PTVs) for the implant stability were tabulated and analyzed using a chi square test at significance level p< 0.05. Results: The results of this this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the Periotest readings for the implants in each category placed in either the OD or the regular osteotomies. However, it has been found that the implants placed in regular drilling ostoetomies had a significantly better primary stability than the implants placed in OD osteotomies. Conclusions: It was concluded that OD is not necessary in situations where there is bone of good quality and quantity.

Keywords: Implant primary stability; Periotest.; implant thread designs; osseodensification.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.. The custom-made dental implants used…
Figure 1.. The custom-made dental implants used in this study.
The thread shapes, from left to right, are V-shaped, buttress, reverse buttress, and trapezoid.
Figure 2.. Drilling the osseodensification osteotomy using…
Figure 2.. Drilling the osseodensification osteotomy using the densah bur after placing the first implant in regular drilling osteotomy.
Figure 3.. The osseodensification Densah burs.
Figure 3.. The osseodensification Densah burs.
Figure 4.. Using the Periotest to evaluate…
Figure 4.. Using the Periotest to evaluate the dental implant primary stability, the Periotest tip is applied to the abutment.

References

    1. Jimbo R, Tovar N, Anchieta RB, et al. : The combined effects of undersized drilling and implant macrogeometry on bone healing around dental implants: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(10):1269–1275. 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.017
    1. Huwais S, Meyer EG: A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):27–36. 10.11607/jomi.4817
    1. Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, et al. : Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;63:56–65. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007
    1. Lopez CD, Alifarag AM, Torroni A, et al. : Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:275–281. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020
    1. Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, et al. : New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016;25(1):24–31. 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358
    1. Podaropoulos L: Increasing the Stability of Dental Implants: The Concept of Osseodensification. Balk J Dent Med. 2017;21(3):133–140. 10.1515/bjdm-2017-0023
    1. Wang LY, Wu Y, Perez KC, et al. : Effects of Condensation on Peri-implant Bone Density and Remodeling. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):413–420. 10.1177/0022034516683932
    1. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, et al. : The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(2):129–136. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x
    1. Park JH, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, et al. : The effect of various thread designs on the initial stability of taper implants. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009;1(1):19–25. 10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.19
    1. Kong L, Liu B, Li D, et al. : Comparative study of 12 thread shapes of dental implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. World Journal of Modelling and Simulation. 2006;2(2):134–140.
    1. Chong L, Khocht A, Suzuki JB, et al. : Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(3):130–135. 10.1563/1548-1336-35.3.130
    1. Lan TH, Du JK, Pan CY, et al. : Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):363–369. 10.1007/s00784-011-0517-z
    1. Wu SW, Lee CC, Fu PY, et al. : The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(7):797–805. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.021
    1. Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, et al. : Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5(4):162–167. 10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.4.3
    1. Summers RB: A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15(2):152, 154–6, 158 passim; quiz 162.
    1. Andresen M, Mackie I, Worthington H: The Periotest in traumatology. Part I. Does it have the properties necessary for use as a clinical device and can the measurements be interpreted? Dent Traumatol. 2003;19(4):214–217. 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00165.x
    1. Noguerol B, Muñoz R, Mesa F, et al. : Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(4):459–464. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01250.x
    1. Oh JS, Kim SG, Lim SC, et al. : A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(4):513–518. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.026
    1. Oh JS, Kim SG: Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(3):e35–e40. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.003
    1. Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B: Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 Suppl 2:2–7. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x
    1. Waechter J, Leite FR, Nascimento GG, et al. : The split crest technique and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(1):116–128. 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.017
    1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. : Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(1):7–26.
    1. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M: Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237–259.
    1. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, et al. : Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(5):529–39. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x
    1. Alkhodary MA, Abdelraheim AE, Elsantawy AE, et al. : The development of a composite bone model for training on placement of dental implants. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015;9(2):153–161. 10.12816/0024112

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi