A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using time-driven activity-based costing

Zuleyha Cidav, David Mandell, Jeffrey Pyne, Rinad Beidas, Geoffrey Curran, Steven Marcus, Zuleyha Cidav, David Mandell, Jeffrey Pyne, Rinad Beidas, Geoffrey Curran, Steven Marcus

Abstract

Background: Implementation strategies increase the adoption of evidence-based practices, but they require resources. Although information about implementation costs is critical for decision-makers with budget constraints, cost information is not typically reported in the literature. This is at least partly due to a need for clearly defined, standardized costing methods that can be integrated into implementation effectiveness evaluation efforts.

Methods: We present a pragmatic approach to systematically estimating detailed, specific resource use and costs of implementation strategies that combine time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), a business accounting method based on process mapping and known for its practicality, with a leading implementation science framework developed by Proctor and colleagues, which guides specification and reporting of implementation strategies. We illustrate the application of this method using a case study with synthetic data.

Results: This step-by-step method produces a clear map of the implementation process by specifying the names, actions, actors, and temporality of each implementation strategy; determining the frequency and duration of each action associated with individual strategies; and assigning a dollar value to the resources that each action consumes. The method provides transparent and granular cost estimation, allowing a cost comparison of different implementation strategies. The resulting data allow researchers and stakeholders to understand how specific components of an implementation strategy influence its overall cost.

Conclusion: TDABC can serve as a pragmatic method for estimating resource use and costs associated with distinct implementation strategies and their individual components. Our use of the Proctor framework for the process mapping stage of the TDABC provides a way to incorporate cost estimation into implementation evaluation and may reduce the burden associated with economic evaluations in implementation science.

Keywords: Costing; Economic evaluation; Implementation strategies; Time-driven activity-based costing.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Dr. Beidas receives royalties from Oxford University Press and has provided consultation to Merck and the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Composition of implementation costs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cost composition by implementation strategy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Action cost by implementation strategy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cost composition by implementation phase

References

    1. Aarons GA, Wells RS, Zagursky K, Fettes DL, Palinkas LA. Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: a multiple stakeholder analysis. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2087–2095. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161711.
    1. Bond GR, Drake RE, McHugo GJ, Peterson AE, Jones AM, Williams J. Long-term sustainability of evidence-based practices in community mental health agencies. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2014;41:228–236. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0461-5.
    1. Willmeroth T, Wesselborg B, Kuske S. Implementation outcomes and indicators as a new challenge in health services research: a systematic scoping review. Inquiry. 2019;56:46958019861257.
    1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
    1. Roberts SLE, Healey A, Sevdalis N. Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields-a systematic literature review. Implement Sci. 2019;14:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0901-7.
    1. Gold R, Bunce AE, Cohen DJ, et al. Reporting on the strategies needed to implement proven interventions: an example from a “real-world” cross-setting implementation study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1074–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.014.
    1. Dopp AR, Mundey P, Beasley LO, Silovsky JF, Eisenberg D. Mixed-method approaches to strengthen economic evaluations in implementation research. Implement Sci. 2019;14:2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0850-6.
    1. Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, et al. Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research agenda. Front Public Health. 2019;7:3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003.
    1. Eisman AB, Kilbourne AM, Dopp AR, Saldana L, Eisenberg D. Economic evaluation in implementation science: making the business case for implementation strategies. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112433. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.008.
    1. O’Beirne M, Reid R, Zwicker K, Sterling P. The costs of developing, implementing, and operating a safety learning system in community practice. Journal of patient …. 2013.
    1. Filene JH, Brodowski ML, Bell J. Using cost analysis to examine variability in replications of an efficacious child neglect prevention program. J Publ Child Welfare. 2014;8:375–396. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2014.939249.
    1. Ritchie MJ, Kirchner JE, Townsend JC, Pitcock JA, Dollar KM, Liu CF. Time and organizational cost for facilitating implementation of primary care mental health integration. J Gen Intern Med. 2019.
    1. Saldana L, Chamberlain P, Bradford WD, Campbell M, Landsverk J. The cost of implementing new strategies (COINS): a method for mapping implementation resources using the stages of implementation completion. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;39:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.006.
    1. Liu CF, Rubenstein LV, Kirchner JE, et al. Organizational cost of quality improvement for depression care. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:225–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00911.x.
    1. Keel G, Savage C, Rafiq M, Mazzocato P. Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Health Policy. 2017;121:755–763. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.013.
    1. Luce BR. Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 1996.
    1. Frick KD. Micro-costing quantity data collection methods. Med Care. 2009;47:S76. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064.
    1. Charles JM, Edwards RT, Bywater T, Hutchings J. Micro-costing in public health economics: steps towards a standardized framework, using the incredible years toddler parenting program as a worked example. Prev Sci. 2013;14:377–389. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0302-5.
    1. Areena SN. A review on time-driven activity-based costing system in various sectors. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and …. 2019.
    1. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Available at SSRN 485443. 2003.
    1. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing: a simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. 2007.
    1. Kaplan RS, Witkowski M, Abbott M, et al. Using time-driven activity-based costing to identify value improvement opportunities in healthcare. J Healthc Manag. 2014;59:399–412.
    1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.
    1. Busby JS, Williams GM. The value and limitations of using process models to describe the manufacturing organization. The International Journal of Production …. 1993.
    1. Foster R, Blakely T, Wilson N, O’Dea D. Protocol for direct costing of health sector interventions for economic modelling (including event pathways) Wellington: University of Otago Department of Public Health; 2013.
    1. da Silva Etges APB, Cruz LN, Notti RK, et al. An 8-step framework for implementing time-driven activity-based costing in healthcare studies. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:1133–1145. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01085-8.
    1. Gonzalez MI. Time-driven activity-based costing for healthcare provider supply chain processes. 2014.
    1. Huang Y-T. Evaluation and recommendation of implementing time-driven activity-based costing in healthcare [dissertation]. The University of Texas School of Public Health; 2016.
    1. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69:123–157. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690.
    1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
    1. Mazza D, Bairstow P, Buchan H, et al. Refining a taxonomy for guideline implementation: results of an exercise in abstract classification. Implement Sci. 2013;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-32.
    1. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. Bmj. 2017.
    1. Boyd MR, Powell BJ, Endicott D, Lewis CC. A method for tracking implementation strategies: an exemplar implementing measurement-based care in community behavioral health clinics. Behav Ther. 2018;49:525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.11.012.
    1. Bunger AC, Powell BJ, Robertson HA, MacDowell H, Birken SA, Shea C. Tracking implementation strategies: a description of a practical approach and early findings. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0175-y.
    1. Grumbach K, Bainbridge E, Bodenheimer T. Facilitating improvement in primary care: the promise of practice coaching. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2012;15:1–14.
    1. Kirchner JE, Smith JL, Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Proctor EK. Getting a clinical innovation into practice: an introduction to implementation strategies. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112467. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.042.
    1. Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9:1057–1064. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby119.
    1. Hulscher M, Wensing M. Process evaluation of implementation strategies. … care: the implementation of change in …. 2020.
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Hurlburt MS. Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y.
    1. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2011;38:4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
    1. Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J, et al. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD004398.
    1. Huynh AK, Hamilton AB, Farmer MM, et al. A pragmatic approach to guide implementation evaluation research: strategy mapping for complex interventions. Front Public Health. 2018;6:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00134.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi