Utility of 1 Measurement Versus Multiple Measurements of Near Point of Convergence After Concussion

Nathan Ernst, Philip Schatz, Alicia M Trbovich, Kouros Emami, Shawn R Eagle, Anne Mucha, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos, Nathan Ernst, Philip Schatz, Alicia M Trbovich, Kouros Emami, Shawn R Eagle, Anne Mucha, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos

Abstract

Context: Increased near point of convergence (NPC) distance is a common finding after concussion and is associated with physical symptoms and worsened neurocognitive performance. Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening measures NPC distance across 3 trials and uses the average measurement to inform clinical care. However, whether 3 trials are necessary, are consistent, or add clinical utility is unknown.

Objective: To investigate the consistency across 3 trials of NPC and establish the classification accuracy (ie, clinical utility) of 1 or 2 trials compared with the standardized average of 3 trials.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Sports medicine clinic and research laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Consecutively enrolled patients aged 10 to 22 years with diagnosed concussions (74% sport related; n = 380).

Main outcome measure(s): The previously reported clinical cutoff value of ≥5 cm across 3 trials was used. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between trials and average scores. Reliable change indices (RCIs) using 95% confidence intervals were also calculated.

Results: The Pearson correlation (r = .98) and intraclass correlation (0.98) coefficients revealed excellent agreement between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 measurements. The RCI across all trials was 2 cm. When the first NPC measurement was ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm, agreement existed within the RCI between the first measurement and the average of 3 measurements in 99.6% of cases. When we averaged the first and second measurements, 379/380 (99.7%) participants had the same classification (ie, <5 cm = normal, ≥5 cm = abnormal) as the average NPC distance across 3 measurements.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest limited utility of multiple or average NPC distance measurements when the initial NPC distance is outside of RCI clinical cutoffs (ie, ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm). Given the high consistency between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 trials, only 1 measurement of NPC distance is warranted unless the first measurement is between 3 and 7 cm.

Keywords: Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS); convergence; mild traumatic brain injury.

© by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Near point of convergence (NPC) measurement differences across 3 trials (T1, T2, T3) between those with normal (gray circles) or abnormal (black triangles) NPC distance, based on a clinical cutoff of ≥5 cm. Error bars indicate standard deviations, and the top of the box indicates the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot of individual near point of convergence (NPC) trial (T)1 measures compared with the NPC average (ie, mean of T1, T2, and T3).

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi