Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Trial

Zien Zhou, Candice Delcourt, Chao Xia, Sohei Yoshimura, Cheryl Carcel, Takako Torii-Yoshimura, Shoujiang You, Alejandra Malavera, Xiaoying Chen, Maree L Hackett, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers, Jianrong Xu, Thompson G Robinson, Mark W Parsons, Andrew M Demchuk, Richard I Lindley, Grant Mair, Joanna M Wardlaw, Craig S Anderson, Zien Zhou, Candice Delcourt, Chao Xia, Sohei Yoshimura, Cheryl Carcel, Takako Torii-Yoshimura, Shoujiang You, Alejandra Malavera, Xiaoying Chen, Maree L Hackett, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers, Jianrong Xu, Thompson G Robinson, Mark W Parsons, Andrew M Demchuk, Richard I Lindley, Grant Mair, Joanna M Wardlaw, Craig S Anderson

Abstract

Objective: To determine any differential efficacy and safety of low- vs standard-dose IV alteplase for lacunar vs nonlacunar acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we performed post hoc analyzes from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) alteplase dose arm.

Methods: In a cohort of 3,297 ENCHANTED participants, we identified those with lacunar or nonlacunar AIS with different levels of confidence (definite/according to prespecified definitions based on clinical and adjudicated imaging findings. Logistic regression models were used to determine associations of lacunar AIS with 90-day outcomes (primary, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 2-6; secondary, other mRS scores, intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], and early neurologic deterioration or death) and treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS with adjustment for baseline covariables.

Results: Of 2,588 participants with available imaging and clinical data, we classified cases as definite/probable lacunar (n = 490) or nonlacunar AIS (n = 2,098) for primary analyses. Regardless of alteplase dose received, lacunar AIS participants had favorable functional (mRS 2-6, adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]) and other clinical or safety outcomes compared to participants with nonlacunar AIS. Low-dose alteplase (versus standard) had no differential effect on functional outcomes (mRS 2-6, 1.04 [0.87-1.24]) but reduced the risk of symptomatic ICH in all included participants. There were no differential treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase on all outcomes across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS (all p interaction ≥0.07).

Conclusions: We found no evidence from the ENCHANTED trial that low-dose alteplase had any advantages over standard dose for definite/probable lacunar AIS.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with lacunar AIS, low-dose alteplase had no additional benefit or safety over standard-dose alteplase.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01422616.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Examples of Lacunar Ischemic Stroke…
Figure 1. Examples of Lacunar Ischemic Stroke at Different Locations From ENCHANTED
Lacunar stroke at (A) left lentiform (red arrow) identified on 24-hour follow-up CT; (B) left internal capsule (red arrow) identified on 24-hour follow-up MRI; (C) right centrum semiovale (red arrow) identified on baseline and 24-hour follow-up MRI; (D) left internal border zone (red arrow) identified on baseline MRI; (E) right thalamus (red arrow) identified on baseline and 24-hour follow-up CT; and (F) brainstem (red arrow) identified on 24-hour follow-up MRI. DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; ENCHANTED = Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study.
Figure 2. Flowchart of Participants Included in…
Figure 2. Flowchart of Participants Included in Analyses
Def/Pro = definite or probable.
Figure 3. Thrombolysis Outcomes in Participants With…
Figure 3. Thrombolysis Outcomes in Participants With Definite/Probable Lacunar and Nonlacunar Stroke by Randomized Treatment
*Adjusted for key prognostic covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, baseline NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score, time from stroke onset to randomization, premorbid function [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0 or 1], prior use of antithrombotic agents [aspirin, other antiplatelet agent, or warfarin], history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease [stroke, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, valvular or other heart disease], assigned to intensive blood pressure–lowering group) for functional outcomes. Adjusted for minimization and key prognostic covariates (age, baseline NIHSS score, time from stroke onset to randomization, and assigned to intensive blood pressure–lowering group) for safety outcomes and neurologic deterioration within 24 hours or 7 days.†Site reported or adjudicated centrally. CI = confidence interval; ECASS = European–Australian Cooperative Acute Stroke Study; END = early neurologic deterioration; ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage; IST-3 = third International Stroke Trial; NINDS = National Institutes of Neurologic Diseases and Stroke; sICH = symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; SITS-MOST = Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke–Monitoring Study.
Figure 4. Randomized Treatment Effects on the…
Figure 4. Randomized Treatment Effects on the Ordinal Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score by Lacunar and Nonlacunar Stroke
*Adjusted for key prognostic covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, baseline NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score, time from stroke onset to randomization, premorbid function [mRS scores 0 or 1], prior use of antithrombotic agents [aspirin, other antiplatelet agent, or warfarin], history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease [stroke, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, valvular or other heart disease], assigned to intensive blood pressure–lowering group).
Figure 5. Thrombolysis Outcomes in Participants With…
Figure 5. Thrombolysis Outcomes in Participants With Definite Lacunar and Nonlacunar Stroke by Randomized Treatment
*Adjusted for key prognostic covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, baseline NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score, time from stroke onset to randomization, premorbid function [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0 or 1], prior use of antithrombotic agents [aspirin, other antiplatelet agent, or warfarin], history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease [stroke, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, valvular or other heart disease], assigned to intensive blood pressure–lowering group) for functional outcomes. Adjusted for minimization and key prognostic covariates (age, baseline NIHSS score, time from stroke onset to randomization, and assigned to intensive blood pressure–lowering group) for safety outcomes and neurologic deterioration within 24 hours or 7 days. †Site reported or adjudicated centrally. CI = confidence interval; ECASS = European–Australian Cooperative Acute Stroke Study; END = early neurologic deterioration; ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage; IST-3 = third International Stroke Trial; NINDS = National Institutes of Neurologic Diseases and Stroke; sICH = symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; SITS-MOST = Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke–Monitoring Study.

References

    1. Hsia AW, Sachdev HS, Tomlinson J, et al. . Efficacy of IV tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke: does stroke subtype really matter? Neurology 2003;61:71–75.
    1. Fuentes B, Martínez-Sánchez P, Alonso de Leciñana M, et al. . Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis according to stroke subtypes: the Madrid Stroke Network data. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:1568–1574.
    1. Mustanoja S, Meretoja A, Putaala J, et al. . Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment: descriptive subtype analysis. Stroke 2011;42:102–106.
    1. Barow E, Boutitie F, Cheng B, et al. . Functional outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with lacunar infarcts in the WAKE-UP trial. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:641–649.
    1. Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM, Whiteley WN, et al. . Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: outcomes by clinically important subgroups in the third International Stroke Trial. Stroke 2015;46:746–756.
    1. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Jones L, et al. . The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1987;18:545–551.
    1. Norrving B. Lacunar infarcts: no black holes in the brain are benign. Pract Neurol 2008;8:222–228.
    1. Regenhardt RW, Das AS, Lo EH, Caplan LR. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of lacunar stroke: a review. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1273–1281.
    1. Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lindley RI, et al. . Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2313–2323.
    1. Huang Y, Sharma VK, Robinson T, et al. . Rationale, design, and progress of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) trial: an international multicenter 2 × 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment. Int J Stroke 2015;10:778–788.
    1. Anderson CS, Woodward M, Arima H, et al. . Statistical analysis plan for evaluating low- vs. standard-dose alteplase in the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED). Int J Stroke 2015;10:1313–1315.
    1. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35–41.
    1. Wardlaw JM, Sandercock P, Cohen G, et al. . Association between brain imaging signs, early and late outcomes, and response to intravenous alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke in the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:485–496.
    1. Mair G, von Kummer R, Adami A, et al. . Arterial obstruction on computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography and response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2017; 48:353–360.
    1. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels G, et al. . Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:822–838.
    1. Arba F, Mair G, Phillips S, et al. . Improving clinical detection of acute lacunar stroke: analysis from the IST-3. Stroke 2020;51:1411–1418.
    1. Matusevicius M, Paciaroni M, Caso V, et al. . Outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute lacunar stroke: an observational study based on SITS international registry and a meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 2019;14:878–886.
    1. Zivanovic Z, Gubi M, Vlahovic D, et al. . Patients with acute lacunar infarction have benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:435–440.
    1. Eggers CCJ, Bocksrucker C, Seyfang L, et al. . The efficacy of thrombolysis in lacunar stroke: evidence from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Eur J Neurol 2017;24:780–787.
    1. Shobha N, Fang J, Hill MD. Do lacunar strokes benefit from thrombolysis? Evidence from the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Int J Stroke 2013;8(suppl A100):45–49.
    1. Fluri F, Hatz F, Rutgers MP, et al. . Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with stroke attributable to small artery occlusion. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:1054–1060.
    1. Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, et al. . Clinically confirmed stroke with negative diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging: longitudinal study of clinical outcomes, stroke recurrence, and systematic review. Stroke 2015;46:3142–3148.
    1. Pantoni L, Fierini F, Poggesi A. Thrombolysis in acute stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;37:5–13.
    1. Nagaraja N, Forder JR, Warach S, et al. . Reversible diffusion-weighted imaging lesions in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Neurology 2020;94:571–587.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi