Impact of extracorporeal shock waves on the human skin with cellulite: a case study of an unique instance

Christoph Kuhn, Fiorenzo Angehrn, Ortrud Sonnabend, Axel Voss, Christoph Kuhn, Fiorenzo Angehrn, Ortrud Sonnabend, Axel Voss

Abstract

In this case study of an unique instance, effects of medium-energy, high-focused extracorporeal generated shock waves (ESW) onto the skin and the underlying fat tissue of a cellulite afflicted, 50-year-old woman were investigated. The treatment consisted of four ESW applications within 21 days. Diagnostic high-resolution ultrasound (Collagenoson) was performed before and after treatment. Directly after the last ESW application, skin samples were taken for histopathological analysis from the treated and from the contra-lateral untreated area of skin with cellulite. No damage to the treated skin tissue, in particular no mechanical destruction to the subcutaneous fat, could be demonstrated by histopathological analysis. However an astounding induction of neocollageno- and neoelastinogenesis within the scaffolding fabric of the dermis and subcutis was observed. The dermis increased in thickness as well as the scaffolding within the subcutaneous fat-tissue. Optimization of critical application parameters may turn ESW into a noninvasive cellulite therapy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Shock-wave: its physics and main biological effects. a) A shock wave is a single, positive pressure pulse rising from surrounding’s pressure followed by an exponential descent and a tensile amplitude below surrounding’s pressure. The rising occurs within nanoseconds to large amplitude up to 10–100 MPa, whereas the tensile amplitude is of long duration of 2000 nsec with a comparatively small negative pressure peak between 10% to 20% of positive pressure peak. b) and c) In overcoming the cohesive forces of fluid cavitation bubbles are generated or enlarged by the shock-wave’s tensile wave component (even in the case of a negative pressure peak of less than 1 MPa). The bubbles may grow to achieve radii of more than 30 μm. These cavitation bubbles collapse after the shock-wave propagated further and surrounding’s pressure is re-established. Subsequent jet-streams can arise with velocities as large as 800 m/sec. d) The energy loss at acoustic impedance interfaces between tissues (Table 1) and even at sub-cellular structures (Bereiter-Hahn and Blase 2003; Lemor et al 2004) by refraction and diffraction contribute to the biological effect of ESW (Table 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Inner structure of the female skin and the underlying subcutaneous tissue. Partitioned border zone between corium and subcutis. The plane of the subcutis with papillae adiposae rising into dells (valley-like) and pits (hole-like) on the undersurface of the corium. Modified from Nürnberger and Müller 1978.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LCCT (Liquid crystal contact thermography, RW27ST with colors corresponding to temperature steps of 0.70 Celsius) of left, proximal, lateral thigh: before 1st ESW-application (control, left), immediately after 3rd ESW-application (middle) and before 4th ESW-application (right). Note the hyperemia at the site of ESW-treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
High-frequency high-resolution ultrasound measurement of skin (Collagenoson®) of left thigh before treatment (control) and after treatment (same site). Treatment: medium-energy, high focused ESW. Notice: increased collagen contentment after treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histopathology of skin and of subcutaneous fat tissue. a) Hematoxylin Eosin stain (HE, nuclei: blue; cytoplasma and connective tissue: red-pink), b) Elastin Van Gieson stain with Resorcin-Fuchsin (EVG, elastic fibers: black, collagen: red, muscle tissue: yellow). One characteristic and representative slide taken from the central (ESW-treated) part of the skin-sample (surface: 75 mm*28 mm, depth: 40 mm, evenly spaced slides) and a corresponding slide (control) of the not treated skin-sample (surface: 70 mm*25 mm, depth 40 mm). Photographs focusing (i) epidermis/dermis/subcutis (4×-objective), (ii) epidermis/dermis (10×-objective), (iii) subcutis (10×-objective). Note: Magnification of each image indicated by bar. No signs of tissue repair are visible – such signs of a response to an injury would be tissue-necrosis, extravasation of erythrocytes, the infiltration of neutrophils lymphocytes and macrophages and the subsequent scar-formation. However an increase of the skin’s connective tissue, the extracellular matrix, particularly collagen and possibly elastin is observed resulting in increased thickness of the dermis and of the scaffolding within the subcutaneous fat tissue.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histopathology of skin and of subcutaneous fat tissue. a) Hematoxylin Eosin stain (HE, nuclei: blue; cytoplasma and connective tissue: red-pink), b) Elastin Van Gieson stain with Resorcin-Fuchsin (EVG, elastic fibers: black, collagen: red, muscle tissue: yellow). One characteristic and representative slide taken from the central (ESW-treated) part of the skin-sample (surface: 75 mm*28 mm, depth: 40 mm, evenly spaced slides) and a corresponding slide (control) of the not treated skin-sample (surface: 70 mm*25 mm, depth 40 mm). Photographs focusing (i) epidermis/dermis/subcutis (4×-objective), (ii) epidermis/dermis (10×-objective), (iii) subcutis (10×-objective). Note: Magnification of each image indicated by bar. No signs of tissue repair are visible – such signs of a response to an injury would be tissue-necrosis, extravasation of erythrocytes, the infiltration of neutrophils lymphocytes and macrophages and the subsequent scar-formation. However an increase of the skin’s connective tissue, the extracellular matrix, particularly collagen and possibly elastin is observed resulting in increased thickness of the dermis and of the scaffolding within the subcutaneous fat tissue.

References

    1. Adamo C, Mazzocchi M, Rossi A, et al. Ultrasonic liposculpturing: extrapolations from the analysis of in vivo sonicated adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:220–6.
    1. Angehrn F, Kuhn C, Voss A. Can cellulite be treated with low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy? Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2:623–30.
    1. Baker HW, Burger HG, de Kretser DM, et al. A study of the endocrine manifestations of hepatic cirrhosis. Q J Med. 1976;45:145–78.
    1. Bereiter-Hahn J, Blasé C. Ultrasonic characterisation of biological cells. In: Kundu T, editor. Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation: Engeneering and Biological Material Characterisation. Boca Raton: CRC Pr; 2003. pp. 725–59.
    1. Brodmann M, Ramschak H, Schreiber F, et al. Venous thrombosis after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a patient with heterozygous APC-resistance. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:861.
    1. Delius M, Draenert K, Al Diek Y, et al. Biological effect of shock waves: In vivo effect of high energy pulses on rabbit bone. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:1219–25.
    1. Gerdersmeyer L, Maier M, Haake M, et al. Physikalisch-technische Grundlagen der extrakorporalen Stoßwellentherapie (ESWT) Der Orthopäde. 2002;31:610–17.
    1. Gerdesmeyer L, von Eiff C, Horn C, et al. Antibacterial effects of extracorporeal shock waves. Ultrasound in Med and Biol. 2005;31:115–19.
    1. Haeussler E, Kiefer W. Anregung von Stoßwellen in Flüssigkeiten durch Hochgeschwindigkeits-Wassertropfen. Verhandlungen Dtsch Phys Gesellschaft (VI) 1971;6:786–9.
    1. Hoffmann R, Brutsch H-P, Largiader F, et al. Liquid-crystal-contact thermography – a new diagnostic method for determination of skin circulation. Helv Chir Acta. 1989;56:263–6.
    1. Kato K, Fujimura M, Nakagawa A, et al. Pressure-dependent effect of shock waves on rat brain : induction of neuronal apoptosis mediated by a caspase-dependent pathway. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:667–76.
    1. Kippenberger S, Loitsch S, Guschel M, et al. Mechanical stretch stimulates PKB/Akt phosphorylation in epidermal cells via angiotensin II type 1 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3060–7.
    1. Koshiyama K, Kodama T, Yano T, et al. Structural change in lipid bilayers and water penetration induced by shock waves: Molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2006;91:2198–205.
    1. Lemor RM, Weiss EC, Pilarczyk G, et al. Mechanical properties of single cells: Measurement possibilities using time-resolved scanning acoustic microscopy. Ultrasonic Symposium, IEEE. 2004;1:622–9.
    1. Mole B, Blanchemaison P, Elia D, et al. High frequency ultrasonography and celluscore: an improvement in the objective evaluation of cellulite phenomenon. Annales de chirurgie plastique esthétique. 2004;49:387–95.
    1. Moosavi-Nejad SF, Hosseini SHR, Satoh M, et al. Shock wave induced cytoskeletal and morphological deformations in a human renal carcinoma cell line. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:296–304.
    1. Müller G, Nürnberger F. Anatomical principles of the so-called “cellulite”. Arch Dematol Forsch. 1972;244:171–2.
    1. Müller SC, Hofmann R, Köhrmann KU, et al. Epidemiologie, instrumentelle Therapie und Metaphylaxe des Harnsteinleidens. Deutsches ärzteblatt. 2004;101 A-1331/B-1101/C-1065.
    1. Neuland H, Kesselman-Evans Z, Duchstein H-J, et al. Outline of the Molecularbiological Effects of the Extracorporal Shockwaves (ESW) on the Human Organism. Orthopädische Praxis. 2004;9:488–92.
    1. Nishida T, Shimokawa H, Oi K, et al. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy markedly ameliorates ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in pigs in vivo. Circulation. 2004;110:3055–61.
    1. Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-called cellulite: an invented disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4:221–9.
    1. Pavicic T, Borelli C, Korting HC. Cellulite – the greatest skin problem in healthy people? An approach. JDDG. 2006;10:861–70.
    1. Quatresooz P, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, et al. Cellulite histopathology and related mechanobiology. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 2006;28:207–10.
    1. Rohrich RJ, Morales DE, Krueger JE, et al. Comparative lipoplasty analysis of in vivo-treated adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2152–8.
    1. Rompe JD, Küllmer D, Vogel J, et al. Extrakorporale Stoßwellentherapie-Experimentelle Grundlagen, klinischer Einsatz. Orthopäde. 1997;26:215–28.
    1. Sapozhnikov OA, Khokhlova VA, Baileya MR, et al. Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:1183–95.
    1. Schaden W, Thiele R, Kölpl C, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in skin lesions. 9th International Congress of the International Society for Musculoskeletal Shockwave Therapy (ISMST) News Letter ISMST. 2006;2:13–14.
    1. Siebert W, Buch M. Extracorporeal shockwaves in orthopedics. Berlin: Springer; 1997.
    1. Siems W, Grune T, Voss P, et al. Anti-fibrosclerotic effects of shock wave therapy in lipedema and cellulite. BioFactors. 2005;24:275–82.
    1. Sparsa A, Lesaux N, Kessler E, et al. Treatmernt of cutaneus calcinosis in CREAST syndrome by extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:263–5.
    1. Steinbach P, Hofstaedter F, Nicolai H, et al. Determination of the energy-dependent extent of vascular damage caused by high-energy shockwaves in an umbilical cord model. Urol Res. 1993;21:279–82.
    1. Tikjob G, Kassis V, Sondergaard J. Ultrasonic B-scanning of the human skin. An introduction of a new ultrasonic skin scanner. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984;64:67–70.
    1. Urhahne P. 2005. Klinische Studie zur Behandlung häufiger Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates des Pferdes mittels fokussierter extrakorporaler Stoßwellentherapie (ESWT) [Dissertation] München Uni.

    1. Wang C-J, Wang F-S, Yang KD. Biological mechanism of musculoskeletal shockwaves. 9th International Congress of the International Society for Musculoskeletal Shockwave Therapy (ISMST) News Letter ISMST. 2006;1:5–11.
    1. Wess O. Physics and technology of shock wave and pressure wave therapy. 9th International Congress of the International Society for Musculoskeletal Shockwave Therapy (ISMST) News Letter ISMST. 2006;2:2–12.
    1. Wilbert DM. A comparative review of extracorporeal shock wave generation. BJU Int. 2002;90:507–11.
    1. Wolfrum B, Ohl C-D, Mettin R, et al. Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2003. Oldenburg: 2003. Die Bedeutung von Kavitationsblasen für transiente Membranpermeabilisierung und Zellschädigung; pp. 826–827. Aachen. M. Vorländer, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik e.V. (DEGA)
    1. Wolfrum B. 2004. Cavitation and shock wave effects on biological systems [Dissertation]. Göttingen Uni.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi