Is ultrasound-guided lavage an effective intervention for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy? A systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Simon Lafrance, Patrick Doiron-Cadrin, Marie Saulnier, Martin Lamontagne, Nathalie J Bureau, Joseph-Omer Dyer, Jean-Sébastien Roy, François Desmeules, Simon Lafrance, Patrick Doiron-Cadrin, Marie Saulnier, Martin Lamontagne, Nathalie J Bureau, Joseph-Omer Dyer, Jean-Sébastien Roy, François Desmeules

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy is characterised by the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals in one of the rotator cuff tendons and can be managed by ultrasound-guided lavage. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lavage for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy remains inconclusive. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to update the available evidence on the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lavage in adults with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy.

Methods: A literature search was conducted up to April 2018 in four bibliographic databases to identify randomised control trials that compared ultrasound-guided lavage alone with other interventions to treat rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. Randomised control trials were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analyses and/or qualitative synthesis of the evidence were performed.

Results: Three randomised control trials were included. Pooled results for pain (n=226) indicated that ultrasound-guided lavage may significantly decrease pain when compared with shockwave therapy, with a mean difference of -1.98 out of 10 points (95% CI -2.52 to -1.45) in the short term and of -1.84 (95% CI -2.63 to -1.04) in the long term. Based on one trial (n=25), ultrasound-guided lavage significantly improved function when compared with shockwave therapy (p<0.05). Based on another trial (n=48), the addition of ultrasound-guided lavage to a corticosteroid injection significantly improves function in the long term (p<0.05).

Conclusion: For individuals with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy, low-quality evidence suggests that ultrasound-guided lavage is more effective than shockwave therapy or a corticosteroid injection alone. Future trials could modify the present conclusions.

Trial registration number: CRD42018095858.

Keywords: hydroxyapatites and needling; rotator cuff; shoulder; tendinopathy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors except NJB report grants from Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité au travail (IRSST) during the conduct of the study which may be considered as a potential conflict of interest. However, since the IRSST is not a private company and does not have any financial interest in the treatment of shoulder disorders, this grant should not be considered as a conflict of interest. We still decided to declare this grant as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic breakdown of literature search results. RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detailed methodological assessment of included studies using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Green: low risk of bias, red: high risk of bias, yellow: unclear or unknown risk of bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk-of-bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk-of-bias item, presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots of pooled studies ultrasound-guided lavage with a corticosteroid injection to shockwave therapy for change in pain in patient with chronic rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. The squares are mean differences and the diamonds are pooled mean difference with 95% CIs. UGL, ultrasound-guided lavage.

References

    1. Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, et al. . Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol 2012;41:150–5. 10.3109/03009742.2011.605390
    1. Tekavec E, Jöud A, Rittner R, et al. . Population-based consultation patterns in patients with shoulder pain diagnoses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13 10.1186/1471-2474-13-238
    1. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJM, et al. . Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004;33:73–81. 10.1080/03009740310004667
    1. Louwerens JKG, Sierevelt IN, van Hove RP, et al. . Prevalence of calcific deposits within the rotator cuff tendons in adults with and without subacromial pain syndrome: clinical and radiologic analysis of 1219 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1588–93. 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.024
    1. Lippmann RK. Observations concerning the calcific cuff deposit. Clin Orthop 1961;20:49–60.
    1. Louwerens JKG, Sierevelt IN, van Noort A, et al. . Evidence for minimally invasive therapies in the management of chronic calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1240–9. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.002
    1. Gärtner J, Simons B. Analysis of calcific deposits in calcifying tendinitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;254:111–20. 10.1097/00003086-199005000-00017
    1. Bureau N. Calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013;17:080–4. 10.1055/s-0033-1333941
    1. Bosworth BM. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12,122 shoulders. J Am Med Assoc 1941;116:2477–82.
    1. Wu Y-C, Tsai W-C, Tu Y-K, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of nonoperative treatments for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.030
    1. Gosens T, Hofstee D-J. Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: advances in imaging and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2009;11:129–34. 10.1007/s11926-009-0018-0
    1. Page MJ, Green S, Mrocki MA, et al. . Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;6 10.1002/14651858.CD012225
    1. Vignesh KN, McDowall A, Simunovic N, et al. . Efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle treatment of calcific tendinitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:148–52. 10.2214/AJR.13.11935
    1. Arirachakaran A, Boonard M, Yamaphai S, et al. . Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage, corticosteroid injection and combined treatment for the treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: a network meta-analysis of RCTs. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017;27:381–90. 10.1007/s00590-016-1839-y
    1. Louwerens JKG, Veltman ES, van Noort A, et al. . The effectiveness of high-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided needling versus arthroscopic surgery in the management of chronic calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016;32:165–75. 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.049
    1. de Witte PB, Selten JW, Navas A, et al. . Calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided needling and lavage versus subacromial corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:1665–73. 10.1177/0363546513487066
    1. Higgins JPT SG. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
    1. De Boer FA, Mocking F, Nelissen EM, et al. . Ultrasound guided needling vs radial shockwave therapy in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized trial. J Orthop 2017;14:466–9. 10.1016/j.jor.2017.07.011
    1. de Witte PB, Kolk A, Overes F, et al. . Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis: ultrasound-guided Needling and lavage versus subacromial corticosteroids: five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:3305–14. 10.1177/0363546517721686
    1. Del Castillo-González F, Ramos-Alvarez JJ, Rodríguez-Fabián G, et al. . Extracorporeal shockwaves versus ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage for the treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016;52:145–51.
    1. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, et al. . Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:927–32. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021
    1. Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, et al. . Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1650–5. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.002
    1. Holmgren T, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, et al. . Minimal important changes in the Constant-Murley score in patients with subacromial pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1083–90. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.014
    1. Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Keller A, et al. . A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:575–84. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012
    1. Braun C, Handoll HH. Estimating the minimal important difference for the Western Ontario rotator cuff index (WORC) in adults with shoulder pain associated with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018;35:30–3. 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.003
    1. Sansone V, Consonni O, Maiorano E, et al. . Calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: the correlation between pain and imaging features in symptomatic and asymptomatic female shoulders. Skeletal Radiol 2016;45:49–55. 10.1007/s00256-015-2240-3
    1. Le Goff B, Berthelot J-M, Guillot P, et al. . Assessment of calcific tendonitis of rotator cuff by ultrasonography: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. JointBone Spine 2010;77:258–63. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.01.012
    1. Kim Y-S, Lee H-J, Kim Y-vin, et al. . Which method is more effective in treatment of calcific tendinitis in the shoulder? Prospective randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided needling and extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1640–6. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.036
    1. Krasny C, Enenkel M, Aigner N, et al. . Ultrasound-guided needling combined with shock-wave therapy for the treatment of calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:501–7. 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15769
    1. Gatt DL, Charalambous CP. Ultrasound-guided barbotage for calcific tendonitis of the shoulder: a systematic review including 908 patients. Arthroscopy 2014;30:1166–72. 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.013
    1. Lanza E, Banfi G, Serafini G, et al. . Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: what is the evidence? A systematic review with proposals for future reporting. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2176–83. 10.1007/s00330-014-3567-1

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi