Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison to not reading a book in bed? The People's Trial-an online, pragmatic, randomised trial

Elaine Finucane, Ann O'Brien, Shaun Treweek, John Newell, Kishor Das, Sarah Chapman, Paul Wicks, Sandra Galvin, Patricia Healy, Linda Biesty, Katie Gillies, Anna Noel-Storr, Heidi Gardner, Mary Frances O'Reilly, Declan Devane, Elaine Finucane, Ann O'Brien, Shaun Treweek, John Newell, Kishor Das, Sarah Chapman, Paul Wicks, Sandra Galvin, Patricia Healy, Linda Biesty, Katie Gillies, Anna Noel-Storr, Heidi Gardner, Mary Frances O'Reilly, Declan Devane

Abstract

Background: The best way of comparing healthcare treatments is through a randomised trial. In a randomised trial, we compare something (a treatment or intervention) to something else, often another treatment. Who gets what is decided at random, meaning everyone has an equal chance of getting any of the treatments. This means any differences found can be put down to the treatment received rather than other things, such as where people live, or health conditions they might have. The People's Trial aimed to help the public better understand randomised trials by inviting them to design and carry out a trial. The question chosen by the public for The People's Trial was: 'Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep, in comparison to not reading a book in bed?' This paper describes that trial, called 'The Reading Trial'.

Methods: The Reading Trial was an online, randomised trial. Members of the public were invited to take part through social media campaigns. People were asked to either read a book in bed before going to sleep (intervention group) or not read a book in bed before going to sleep (control group). We asked everyone to do this for 7 days, after which they measured their sleep quality.

Results: During December 2019, a total of 991 people took part in The Reading Trial, half (496 (50%)) in the intervention group and half (495 (50%)) in the control group. Not everyone finished the trial: 127 (25.6%) people in the intervention group and 90 (18.18%) people in the control group. Of those providing data, 156/369 (42%) people in the intervention group felt their sleep improved, compared to 112/405 (28%) of those in the control group, a difference of 14%. When we consider how certain we are of this finding, we estimate that, in The Reading Trial, sleep improved for between 8 and 22% more people in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusions: Reading a book in bed before going to sleep improved sleep quality, compared to not reading a book in bed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019.

Keywords: Methodology; Online; Public engagement; Randomised trial; Research co-production; Sleep; We wrote this report using a plain language format. We did this in response to how people told us they wanted the results of The Reading Trial to be shared (phase vii of The People’s Trial)..

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Reading Trial results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sleep quality at the start of The Reading Trial
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sleep quality at the end of The Reading Trial

References

    1. Gillies K, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Elbourne D, Elliott J, Treweek S. Reducing research waste by promoting informed responses to invitations to participate in clinical trials. Trials. 2019;20:613. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3704-x.
    1. Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Fraser C, Mitchell E, Sullivan F, Jackson C, Taskila TK, Gardner H. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.
    1. Carlisle B, Kimmelman J, Ramsay T, MacKinnon N. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials. Clinical trials (London, England) 2015;12(1):77–83. doi: 10.1177/1740774514558307.
    1. Walters SJ, Bonacho dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby I, Bortolami O, Flight L, Hind D, Jacques RM, Knox C, Nadin B, Rothwell J, Surtees M, Julious SA. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015276.
    1. Macleod M., Michie M., Roberts I., Dirnagl U., Chalmers I., Ioannidis J., Al-Shahi Salman R., Chan A-W. & Glasziou P., Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste, Lancet, 383, 9912, 2014, 101-104, 0140-6736, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. ()
    1. Kadam RA, Borde SU, Madas SA, Salvi SS, Limaye SS. Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects. Perspect Clin Res. 2016;7(3):137–143. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184820.
    1. Center for Information and Study on Clinical Research Participation (CISCRP) General Perceptions and Knowledge on clinical research. 2017.
    1. Brandberg Y, Johansson H, Bergenmar M. Patients' knowledge and perceived understanding - Associations with consenting to participate in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2015;2:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.001.
    1. Sheridan R, Martin-Kerry J, Hudson J, et al. Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators. Trials. 2020;21:259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3.
    1. Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
    1. Ford J, Howerton M, Lai G, Gary T, Bolen S, Gibbons C, Tilburt J. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review. Cancer. 2007;112(2):228–242. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23157.
    1. Rivers D, August EM, Sehovic I, Lee Green B, Quinn GP. A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans' participation in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;35(2):13–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007.
    1. Ford ES, Cunningham TJ, Croft JB. Trends in self-reported sleep duration among US adults from 1985 to 2012. Sleep. 2015;38(5):829–832. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4684.
    1. Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, Dinges D, Gangwisch J, Grandner M, Kushida C, Malhotra RM, Martin JL, Patel ER, Quan SF, Tasali E. Joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society on the recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: Methodology and discussion. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(8):931–952. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4926.
    1. Montgomery P, Dennis JA. Physical exercise for sleep problems in adults aged 60+ Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;4:Art. No.: CD003404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003404.
    1. Kleinman NL, Brook RA, Doan JF, Melkonian AK, Baran RW. Health benefit costs and absenteeism due to insomnia from the employer's perspective: a retrospective, case-control, database study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(8):1098–1104. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04264.
    1. Chattu VK, Manzar MD, Kumary S, Burman D, Spence DW, Pandi-Perumal SR. The Global Problem of Insufficient Sleep and Its Serious Public Health Implications. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2018;7(1):1. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010001.
    1. Léger D, Poursain B, Neubauer D, Uchiyama M. An international survey of sleeping problems in the general population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):307–317. doi: 10.1185/030079907X253771.
    1. Calhoun D. Sleep disorders and hypertension risk. J Hum Hypertens. 2017;31:371–372. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2017.2.
    1. Snyder E, Cai B, DeMuro C, Morrison MF, Ball W. A New Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale: Results of Psychometric Evaluation in Patients With Chronic Primary Insomnia and Depression. J Clin Sleep Med : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2018;14(11):1849–1857. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7478.
    1. National Institutes of Health . Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Northwestern University. 2020.
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M, PROMIS Cooperative Group The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.
    1. Riegel B, Hanlon AL, Zhang X, Fleck D, Sayers SL, Goldberg LR, Weintraub WS. What is the best measure of daytime sleepiness in adults with heart failure? J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013;25(5):272–279.
    1. Kerkhof GA. Epidemiology of sleep and sleep disorders in The Netherlands. Sleep Med. 2017;30:229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.09.015.
    1. World Health Organization . Research ethics committees Basic concepts for capacity-building Ethics and Health Unit, Department of Ethics, Equity, Trade and Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland. 2009.
    1. Blunden S, Lushington K, Lorenzen B, et al. Are sleep problems under-recognised in general practice? Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:708–712. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.027011.
    1. Filip I, Tidman M, Saheba N, Bennett H, Wick B, Rouse N, Patriche D, Radfar A. Public health burden of sleep disorders: underreported problem. J Public Health. 2017;25:243–248. doi: 10.1007/s10389-016-0781-0.
    1. MacLeod S., Musich S., Kraemer S. & Wicker E. (2018) Practical non-pharmacological intervention approaches for sleep problems among older adults, Geriatr Nurs, 39, 5, 506-512, 0197-4572, 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.02.002.
    1. Mann C, Chilcott S, Plumb K, Brooks E, Man MS. Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y.
    1. Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):240–253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805.
    1. Zachariae R, Amidi A, Damholdt MF, Clausen CDR, Dahlgaard J, Lord H, Thorndike F, Ritterband LM. Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JNCI: Journal Nat Cancer Inst. 2018;110(8):880–887. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx293.
    1. Hmwe NTT, Browne G, Mollart L, Allanson V, Wai-Chi CS. Acupressure to improve sleep quality of older people in residential aged care: a randomised controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2020;21:360. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04286-2.
    1. Harb GC, Cook JM, Phelps AJ, Gehrman PR, Forbes D, Localio R, Harpaz-Rotem I, Gur RC, Ross RJ. (2019) Randomized controlled trial of imagery rehearsal for posttraumatic nightmares in combat veterans. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(5):757–767. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7770.
    1. Spitzer S, Weber D. Reporting biases in self-assessed physical and cognitive health status of older Europeans. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223526.
    1. Rosenman R, Tennekoon V, Hill LG. Measuring bias in self-reported data. Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2011;2(4):320–332. doi: 10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi