Triamcinolone Acetonide Suprachoroidal Injectable Suspension for Uveitic Macular Edema: Integrated Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies

Steven Yeh, Christopher R Henry, Barry Kapik, Thomas A Ciulla, Steven Yeh, Christopher R Henry, Barry Kapik, Thomas A Ciulla

Abstract

Introduction: Macular edema, a common complication of uveitis, may result in vision loss. The aim of this analysis was to report integrated phase 3 trial data for triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use (SCS-TA) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis using strict inclusion criteria.

Methods: This analysis included patients with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 300 µm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 5 and ≤ 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at both screening and baseline who received ≥ 1 study treatment in either PEACHTREE (randomized, double-masked SCS-TA or sham control) or AZALEA (open-label SCS-TA). Patients received SCS-TA 4.0 mg (0.1 ml of 40 mg/ml) or control at baseline and week 12.

Results: In the SCS-TA group (n = 95), 47.4% of patients gained ≥ 15 ETDRS letters from baseline to week 24 versus 16.7% of patients in the control group (n = 60; P < 0.001). Mean change in BCVA in the SCS-TA group was 9.6 letters at week 4 and 13.9 letters at week 24. CST also improved rapidly in the SCS-TA group (mean change: - 158.4 µm at week 4), with sustained reduction throughout the study (mean change: - 163.9 µm at week 24 versus - 19.3 µm in the control group; P < 0.001). No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Incidence of AEs pertaining to elevated intraocular pressure was 12.6% and 15.0% in the SCS-TA and control groups, respectively; incidence of cataract formation/worsening AEs was 7.4% and 6.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: In this integrated analysis utilizing strict inclusion criteria, SCS-TA was found effective in the treatment of patients with macular edema associated with noninfectious uveitis and was generally well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02595398, NCT03097315.

Keywords: Central subfield thickness; Macular edema; Suprachoroidal; Triamcinolone acetonide; Uveitis.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. aBaseline CST ≥ 300 µm and baseline BCVA of ≥ 5 and ≤ 70 ETDRS letters. BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, CST central subfield thickness, ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, SCS-TA triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Improvement in BCVA shown as a mean change from baseline in ETDRS letters, b percentage of patients with gain of ≥ 15 ETDRS and c percentage of patients with BCVA of 20/40 or better at each assessment. aP < 0.001 versus control. BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, SCS-TA triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Improvement in macular edema shown as a mean change from baseline in central subfield thickness, b percentage of patients with ≥ 20% reduction in excess CST and c percentage of patients with CST < 300 µm at each assessment. aP < 0.001 for SCS-TA versus control. bSample sizes vary slightly by visit based on data availability. SCS-TA triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of patients with resolution of a anterior chamber cells, b anterior chamber flare and c vitreous haze at each assessment among patients with baseline inflammation (i.e., Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature criteria grade > 0) for each sign. aP < 0.05 for SCS-TA versus control. bP < 0.001 for SCS-TA versus control. cP < 0.01 for SCS-TA versus control. SCS-TA triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use

References

    1. Sève P, Cacoub P, Bodaghi B, et al. Uveitis: diagnostic work-up. A literature review and recommendations from an expert committee. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(12):1254–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.10.010.
    1. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.057.
    1. Lardenoye CWTA, van Kooij B, Rothova A. Impact of macular edema on visual acuity in uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1446–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.027.
    1. Rothova A, Suttorp-van Schulten MSA, Treffers WF, Kijlstra A. Causes and frequency of blindness in patients with intraocular inflammatory disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):332–336. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.332.
    1. Durrani OM, Tehrani NN, Marr JE, Moradi P, Stavrou P, Murray PI. Degree, duration, and causes of visual loss in uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(9):1159–1162. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.037226.
    1. Hui MM, Wakefield D, Patel I, Cvejic E, McCluskey PJ, Chang JH. Visual functioning and health-related quality-of-life are compromised in patients with uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25(4):486–491. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2016.1139734.
    1. Hariprasad SM, Joseph G, Gagnon-Sanschagrin P, et al. Healthcare costs among patients with macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis: a US commercial payer's perspective. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021;6(1):e000896. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000896.
    1. Koronis S, Stavrakas P, Balidis M, Kozeis N, Tranos PG. Update in treatment of uveitic macular edema. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:667–680. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S166092.
    1. Goldhardt R, Rosen BS. Uveitic macular edema: treatment update. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2016;4(1):30–37. doi: 10.1007/s40135-016-0090-3.
    1. Hancock SE, Wan C-R, Fisher NE, Andino RV, Ciulla TA. Biomechanics of suprachoroidal drug delivery: from benchtop to clinical investigation in ocular therapies. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18(6):777–788. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1867532.
    1. Habot-Wilner Z, Noronha G, Wykoff CC. Suprachoroidally injected pharmacological agents for the treatment of chorio-retinal diseases: a targeted approach. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(5):460–472. doi: 10.1111/aos.14042.
    1. Chiang B, Jung JH, Prausnitz MR. The suprachoroidal space as a route of administration to the posterior segment of the eye. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;126:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.001.
    1. Wan C-R, Kapik B, Wykoff CC, et al. Clinical characterization of suprachoroidal injection procedure utilizing a microinjector across three retinal disorders. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(11):27. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.27.
    1. Naftali Ben Haim L, Moisseiev E. Drug delivery via the suprachoroidal space for the treatment of retinal diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(7):967. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070967.
    1. Edelhauser HF, Patel S, Meschter C, Dean R, Powell K, Verhoeven R. Suprachoroidal microinjection delivers triamcinolone acetonide to therapeutically-relevant posterior ocular structures and limits exposure in the anterior segment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(15):5063.
    1. Edelhauser HF, Verhoeven RS, Burke B, Struble CB, Rajnikant S. Intraocular distribution and targeting of triamcinolone acetonide suspension administered into the suprachoroidal space (abstract) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(13):5259.
    1. Chen M, Li X, Liu J, Han Y, Cheng L. Safety and pharmacodynamics of suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as a controlled ocular drug release model. J Control Release. 2015;203:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.021.
    1. Yeh S, Kurup SK, Want RC, et al. Suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide, CLS-TA, for macular edema due to nonifectious uveitis: a randomized, phase 2 study (DOGWOOD) Retina. 2019;39:1880–1888. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002279.
    1. Yeh S, Khurana RN, Shah M, et al. Efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal CLS-TA for macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis: phase 3 randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(7):948–955. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.006.
    1. Henry CR, Shah M, Barakat MR, et al. Suprachoroidal CLS-TA for non-infectious uveitis: an open-label, safety trial (AZALEA) Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106(6):802–806. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318019.
    1. XIPERE (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension), for suprachoroidal use. Package insert. Clearside Biomedical Inc; 2021.
    1. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC, Roberge F. Standardization of vitreal inflammatory activity in intermediate and posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(4):467–471. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(85)34001-0.
    1. Lowder C, Belfort R, Jr, Lightman S, et al. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(5):545–553. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.339.
    1. Wan C-R, Muya L, Kansara V, Ciulla TA. Suprachoroidal delivery of small molecules, nanoparticles, gene and cell therapies for ocular diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(2):288. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020288.
    1. Chiang B, Venugopal N, Grossniklaus HE, Jung JH, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. Thickness and closure kinetics of the suprachoroidal space following microneedle injection of liquid formulations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(1):555–564. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20377.
    1. Willoughby AS, Vuong VS, Cunefare D, et al. Choroidal changes after suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.020.
    1. Lampen SIR, Khurana RN, Noronha G, Brown DM, Wykoff CC. Suprachoroidal space alterations following delivery of triamcinolone acetonide: post-hoc analysis of the phase 1/2 HULK study of patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49(9):692–697. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180831-07.
    1. Gilger BC, Abarca EM, Salmon JH, Patel S. Treatment of acute posterior uveitis in a porcine model by injection of triamcinolone acetonide into the suprachoroidal space using microneedles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2483–2492. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11747.
    1. Goldstein DA, Do D, Noronha G, Kissner JM, Srivastava SK, Nguyen QD. Suprachoroidal corticosteroid administration: a novel route for local treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(6):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.14.
    1. Ciulla TA, Kapik B, Grewal DS, Ip MS. Visual acuity in retinal vein occlusion, diabetic, and uveitic macular edema: central subfield thickness and ellipsoid zone analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(7):633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.10.016.
    1. Ciulla TA, Kapik B, Barakat MR, et al. OCT anatomic and temporal biomarkers in uveitic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;237:310–324. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.024.
    1. Merrill PT, Henry CR, Nguyen QD, Reddy A, Kapik B, Ciulla TA. Suprachoroidal CLS-TA with and without systemic corticosteroid and/or steroid-sparing therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PEACHTREE clinical trial. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021 doi: 10.1080/09273948.2021.1954199.
    1. Singer MA, Merrill P, Yeh S, Hall C, Kapik B, Ciulla TA. Suprachoroidal CLS-TA versus rescue therapies for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a post hoc analysis of PEACHTREE. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;50(1):23–30.
    1. Khurana RN, Merrill P, Yeh S, et al. Extension study of the safety and efficacy of CLS-TA for treatment of macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis (MAGNOLIA) Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106(8):1139–1144.
    1. Thorne JE, Sugar EA, Holbrook JT, et al. Periocular triamcinolone vs intravitreal triamcinolone vs intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: the PeriOcular vs INTravitreal corticosteroids for uveitic macular edema (POINT) trial. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(2):283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.021.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi