Formulation and evaluation of periodontal in situ gel

Kevin Garala, Parth Joshi, Malay Shah, A Ramkishan, Jaydeep Patel, Kevin Garala, Parth Joshi, Malay Shah, A Ramkishan, Jaydeep Patel

Abstract

Background: The present study was aimed to develop and optimize in situ gel for the treatment of periodontal disease.

Materials and methods: Temperature-sensitive in situ gel containing 0.1% w/v Chlorhexidine hydrochloride was formulated by cold method using different polymers. Preliminary study was carried out to optimize different types and concentration of polymers such as Poloxamer 188, Poloxamer 407, Gellan gum, and Carbopol 934P. Central composite design was employed for optimization of the effect of independent variables such as Poloxamer 407 and Carbopol 934P on responses such as gelation temperature, spreadability, cumulative percentage release at 2 h, and time for 50% drug release (t50 %). Each formulations were evaluated for clarity, pH, gelation temperature, spreadability, drug content, in vitro drug release, t50 %, and cumulative percentage drug release at 2 h.

Results: Results of evaluation parameters revealed that the drug release, gelation temperature was considerably decreased with increasing t50 % as the concentration of each polymer was increased. The desirability function was utilized to find out optimized formulation of the factorial design. Formulation F6 showed the highest overall desirability of 0.6283 and, therefore, this formulation was considered to be the optimized formulation. The % relative error was calculated, which showed that observed responses were in close agreement with the predicted values calculated from the generated regression equations.

Conclusion: The clarity, pH, drug content of all formulations was found to be satisfactory. Further, all the formulations showed sustained drug release for a period of 6 h, which satisfied to treat periodontal disease.

Keywords: Carbopol 934P; chlorhexidine hydrochloride; in situ gel; periodontal disease; poloxamer 407.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FTIR spectrum of chlorhexidine HCl
Figure 2
Figure 2
FTIR spectrum of poloxamer 188
Figure 3
Figure 3
FTIR spectrum of poloxamer 407
Figure 4
Figure 4
FTIR spectrum of carbopol 934P
Figure 5
Figure 5
FTIR spectrum of physical mixture
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Response surface plot showing effect of gelation temperature of variables [Poloxamer 407 (X1) and Carbopol 934P (X2)] (b) the corresponding Contour plot
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Response surface plot showing effect of spreadability of variables [Poloxamer 407 (X1) and Carbopol 934P (X2)] (b) the corresponding Contour plot
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Response surface plot showing effect of CPR at 2 h of variables [Poloxamer 407 (X1) and Carbopol 934P (X2)] (b) the corresponding Contour plot
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) Response surface plot showing effect of t50% of variables [Poloxamer 407 (X1) and Carbopol 934P (X2)] (b) the corresponding Contour plot
Figure 10
Figure 10
DSC thermogram of pure drug and optimized formulation
Figure 11
Figure 11
In vitro drug release profile of Chlorhexidine HCl

References

    1. Vyas SP, Sihorkar V, Mishra V. Controlled and targeted drug delivery strategies towards intraperiodontal pocket diseases. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000;25:21–42.
    1. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Attachment level changes in destructive periodontal diseases. J ClinPeriodontol. 1986;13:461–75.
    1. Iqbal Z, Jain N, Jain GK, Talegaonkar S, Ahuja A, Khar RK, et al. Dental therapeutic systems. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2008;2:58–67.
    1. Nagarwal RC, Srinatha A, Pandit JK. In situ forming formulation: Development, evaluation and optimization using 33 factorial design. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2009;10:977–84.
    1. Mahajan H, Shaikh H, Gattani S, Nerkar P. In situ gelling system based on thiolatedgellan gum as new carrier for nasal administration of dimenhydrinate. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech. 2009;2:544–50.
    1. Krishna MK, Ravindran SK, Vivekanandan G, Navasivayam A, Thiagarajan R, Mohan R. Effect of a single episode of subgingival irrigation with tetracycline HCl or chlorhexidine: A clinical and microbiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011;15:245–9.
    1. Wannachaiyasit S, Phaechamud T. Development of chlorhexidine thermosensitive gels as a mouth antiseptic. J Miner Met Mater Soc. 2010;20:165–8.
    1. Schwach-Abdellaouia K, Vivien-Castionib N, Gurny R. Local delivery of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of periodontal diseases. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50:83–99.
    1. Ruel-Gariépy E, Leroux JC. In situ-forming hydrogels: Review of temperature-sensitive systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;58:409–26.
    1. Klouda L, Mikos AG. Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;68:34–45.
    1. Nirmal HB, Bakliwal SR, Pawar SP. In situ gel: New trends in controlled and sustained drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2010;2:1398–408.
    1. Jelvehgaria M, Rashidib MR, Samadia H. Mucoadhesive and drug release properties of benzocaine gel. Iranian J Pharm Sci Autumn. 2006;2:185–94.
    1. Ji QX, Zhao QS, Deng J. A novel injectable chlorhexidinethermosensitive hydrogel for periodontal application: Preparation, antibacterial activity and toxicity evaluation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:2435–42.
    1. Jayaraj Kumar K, Jayachandran E, Srinivas GM, Giridhar B, Nair R, Jayakandan M. Formulation of thermoresponsive and buccal adhesive in situ gel for treatment of oral thrush containing itraconazole. J Pharm Sci Res. 2010;2:116–22.
    1. Singh G, Pai RS, Devi VK. Response surface methodology and process optimization of sustained release pellets using taguchi orthogonal array design and central composite design. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2012;3:30–40.
    1. Garala K, Patel J, Patel A, Dharamsi A. Enhanced encapsulation of metoprolol tartrate with carbon nanotubes as adsorbent. Appl Nanosci. 2011;1:219–230.
    1. Harrington J. The desirability function. Ind Qual Control. 1965;21:494–8.
    1. Derringer R, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol. 1980;12:214–9.
    1. Gupta H, Sharma A, Shrivastava B. Pluronic and chitosan based in situ gel system for periodontal application. Asian J Pharm. 2009:94–6.
    1. Dabhi MR, Nagori SA, Gohel MC, Parikh RK, Sheth NR. Formulation development of smart gel periodontal drug delivery system for local delivery of chemotherapeutic agents with application of experimental design. Drug Deliv. 2010;17:520–31.
    1. Nanjawade BK, Manvi FV, Manjappa AS. In situ forming hydrogels for sustained ophthalmic drug delivery. J Control Release. 2007;122:199–34.
    1. Miller SC, Donovan MD. Effect of poloxamer 407 gel on the miotic activity of pilocarpine nitrate in rabbits. Int J Pharm. 1982;12:147–52.
    1. Badgujar SD, Sontakke MA, Narute DR, Karmarkar RR, Tupkar SV, Barhate SD. Formulation and evaluation of sumatriptan succinate nasal in situ gel using fulvic acid as novel permeation enhancer. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2010;2:1–8.
    1. Kumar P, Awasthi R, Kumar PR, Kumar M, Kumar MP. Mucoadhesive in situ gels of local anaesthetic for periodontia. Der Pharm Lettre. 2010;2:28–39.
    1. Patel RP, Baria AH, Pandya NB, Tank HM. Formulation evaluation and optimization of stomach specific in situ gel of ranitidine hydrochloride. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech. 2010;3:834–43.
    1. Wamorkar V, Varma MM, Manjunath SY. Formulation and evaluation of stomach specific in situ gel of metoclopramide using natural, bio-degradable Polymers. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci. 2011;2:193–201.
    1. Harish NM, Prabhu P, Charyulu RN, Gulzar MA, Subrahmanyam EV. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gel containing clotrimazole for oral candidiasis. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71:421–7.
    1. Kumar L, Verma R. In vitro evaluation of topical gel prepared using natural polymer. Int J Drug Del. 2010;2:58–63.
    1. Scherlund M, Welin-Berger K, Brodin A, Malmsten M. Local anaesthetic block copolymer system undergoing phase transition on dilution with water. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14:53–61.
    1. Shams MS, Alam MI, Ali A, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Pharmacodynamics of a losartan transdermal system for the treatment of hypertension. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010;36:385–92.
    1. Gui-Ling L, Mei L. Preparation and evaluation of ophthalmic thermosensitive in situ gels of penciclovir. J Chinese Pharm Sci. 2007;16:90–5.
    1. Majithiya RJ, Ghosh PK, Umrethia ML, Murthy SR. Thermoreversible-mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of Sumatriptan. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2006;7:67.
    1. Gonjari ID, Hosmani AH, Karmarkar AB, Godage AS, Kadam SB, Dhabale PN. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gelling thermoreversible mucoadhesive gel of fluconazole. Drug Discov Ther. 2009;3:6–9.
    1. Abdel-Mottaleb MM, Mortada ND, Elshamy AA, Awad GA. Preparation and evaluation of fluconazolegels. Egypt J Biomed Sci. 2007;23:266–86.
    1. Vijayalakshmi A, Tripura A, Ravichandiran V. Development and evaluation of anti-acne products from terminaliaarjuna bark. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2011;3:320–7.
    1. Patel RP, Dadhani B, Ladani R, Baria AH, Patel J. Formulation, evaluation and optimization of stomach specific in situ gel of clarithromycin and metronidazole benzoate. Int J Drug Del. 2010;2:141–53.
    1. Bhardwaj R, Blanchard J. Controlled release delivery system for the α-MSH analog melanotan-1 using poloxamer 407. J Pharm Sci. 1996;85:915–9.
    1. Paterakis PG, Korakianiti ES, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM. Evaluation and simultaneous optimization of some pellets characteristics using 3 (3) factorial design and the desirability function. Int J Pharm. 2002;248:51–60.
    1. Mashru RC, Sutariya VB, Sankalia MG, Parikh PP. Development and evaluation of fast-dissolving film of salbutamol sulphate. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2005;31:25–34.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi