The uses of emotion maps in research and clinical practice with families and couples: methodological innovation and critical inquiry

Jacqui Gabb, Reenee Singh, Jacqui Gabb, Reenee Singh

Abstract

We explore how "emotion maps" can be productively used in clinical assessment and clinical practice with families and couples. This graphic participatory method was developed in sociological studies to examine everyday family relationships. Emotion maps enable us to effectively "see" the dynamic experience and emotional repertoires of family life. Through the use of a case example, in this article we illustrate how emotion maps can add to the systemic clinicians' repertoire of visual methods. For clinicians working with families, couples, and young people, the importance of gaining insight into how lives are lived, at home, cannot be understated. Producing emotion maps can encourage critical personal reflection and expedite change in family practice. Hot spots in the household become visualized, facilitating dialogue on prevailing issues and how these events may be perceived differently by different family members. As emotion maps are not reliant on literacy or language skills they can be equally completed by parents and children alike, enabling children's perspective to be heard. Emotion maps can be used as assessment tools, to demonstrate the process of change within families. Furthermore, emotion maps can be extended to use through technology and hence are well suited particularly to working with young people. We end the article with a wider discussion of the place of emotions and emotion maps within systemic psychotherapy.

Keywords: Clinical Practice; Emotion Maps; Family Relationships; Family Systemic Psychotherapy; Visual Methods; estudios familiares; familias; mapas de las emociones; métodos visuales; práctica clínica; relaciones de pareja; 临床实践; 可视方法; 夫妇关系; 家庭; 家庭研究; 情感地图.

© 2014 The Authors. Family Process published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Family Process Institute.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emoticons
Figure 2
Figure 2
Catherine (Aged 10) Drawing: “My Family”
Figure 3
Figure 3
Catherine (Aged 10) Emotion Map 1 Yellow = Dad; red = Mum; Catherine = purple; Richard = green
Figure 4
Figure 4
Catherine (Aged 10) Emotion Map 2 Yellow = Dad; pink = Mum; Catherine = red; Richard = green; neighbor = purple

References

    1. Bertrando P. Emotional dances: Therapeutic dialogues as embodied systems. Journal of Family Therapy. 2008;30(4):362–372.
    1. Bridge L. Seeing and telling households: A case for photo elicitation and graphic elicitation in qualitative research. Graduate Journal of Social Science. 2013;10(2):106–131.
    1. Cade BW. Some uses of metaphor. Australian Journal of Family Therapy. 1982;3(3):135–140.
    1. Campbell D, Groenbaek M. Taking positions in the organization. London: Karnac; 2006.
    1. Chimera C. A passion for action. Context. 2013;April(126):1–2.
    1. Clark A, Moss P. Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK: National Children's Bureau; 2001.
    1. Deacon SA. Creativity within qualitative research on families: New ideas for old methods. The Qualitative Report. 2000;4(3 + 4) Retrieved September 8, 2010, from .
    1. Duncan S, Edwards R. Lone mothers, paid work and gendered moral rationalities. London: Macmillan; 1999.
    1. Duncan S, Phillips M. People who live apart together (LATs): How different are they? The Sociological Review. 2010;58(1):112–134.
    1. Fredman G. Transforming emotion: Conversations in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Whurr Publishers; 2004.
    1. Gabb J. Researching intimacy in families. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
    1. Gabb J. Researching family relationships: A qualitative mixed methods approach. Methodological Innovations Online. 2009;4(2):37–52.
    1. Gabb J. Troubling displays: The affect of gender, sexuality and class. In: Seymour J, editor; Dermott E, editor. Displaying families: A new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. pp. 38–60.
    1. Gabb J. Embodying risk: Managing father–child intimacy and the display of nudity in families. Sociology. 2013;47(4):639–654.
    1. Gabb J, Klett-Davies M, Fink J, Thomae M. Enduring love? Couple relationships in the 21st century. Milton Keynes: The Open University; 2013. Survey Findings Report.. Retrieved January 1, 2014, from .
    1. Gabb J, Singh R. Reflections on the challenges of understanding racial, cultural and sexual differences in couple relationship research. Journal of Family Therapy. 2014 doi: .
    1. Graesch AP. Notions of family embedded in the house. Anthropology News. 2004;45(5):20.
    1. Hardy KV, Laszloffy T. The cultural genogram: Key to training cultural competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1995;21(3):227–237.
    1. Hill M, Laybourn A, Borland M. Engaging with primary-aged children about their emotions and well-being: Methodological considerations. Children and Society. 1996;10(1):129–144.
    1. Hoffman L. Exchanging voices: A collaborative approach. London: Karnac; 1993.
    1. Jacobson KD. Drawing households and other living spaces in the process of assessment and psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal. 1995;23(3):305–325.
    1. Korzybski A. A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. In: Korzybski A, editor. Science and Sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Lakeville, CT: International non-Aristotelian Library; 1933. pp. 746–761.
    1. McGoldrick M, Gerson R, Petry S. Genograms: Assessment and intervention. London: WWW Norton; 2008.
    1. Minuchin S. Famlies and family therapy. London: Routledge; 1975.
    1. Morrison C-A, Johnston L, Longhurst R. Critical geographies of love as spatial, relational and political. Progress in Human Geography. 2013;37(4):505–521.
    1. Papp P. Staging reciprocal metaphors in couples therapy. Family Process. 1982;21:453–467.
    1. Papp P, Scheinkman M, Malpas J. Breaking the mould: Sculpting impasses in couples therapy. Family Process. 2013;52(1):33–45.
    1. Pittman FS. Wet cocker spaniel therapy: An essay on technique in family therapy. Family Process. 1984;23:1–9.
    1. Rober P. Relational drawings in couple therapy. Family Process. 2009;48(1):117–133.
    1. Rose G. Doing family photography: The domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. London: Ashgate; 2010.
    1. Satir V. Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books; 1972.
    1. Ugazio V. Semantic polarities and psychopathologies in the family: Permitted and forbidden stories. London: Routledge; 2013.
    1. White SL. Family dinner time: A focus for life space diagrams. Clinical Social Work. 1976;4(2):93–101.
    1. Wilson J. The performance of practice: Enhancing the repertoire of therapy with children and families. London: Karnac; 2007.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi