Novel Application of 18F-NaF PET/CT Imaging for Evaluation of Active Bone Remodeling in Diabetic Patients With Charcot Neuropathy: A Proof-of-Concept Report

Nguyen K Tram, Ting-Heng Chou, Surina Patel, Laila N Ettefagh, Michael R Go, Said A Atway, Mitchel R Stacy, Nguyen K Tram, Ting-Heng Chou, Surina Patel, Laila N Ettefagh, Michael R Go, Said A Atway, Mitchel R Stacy

Abstract

Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy (CN) is a serious and potentially limb-threatening complication for patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease. In recent decades, nuclear medicine-based approaches have been used for non-invasive detection of CN; however, to date, a positron emission tomography (PET) radionuclide specifically focused on targeted imaging of active bone remodeling has not been explored or validated for patients with CN. The radionuclide 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) has historically been used as a bone imaging probe due to its high sensitivity for targeting hydroxyapatite and bone turnover, but has not been applied in the context of CN. Therefore, the present study focused on novel application of 18F-NaF PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging to three clinical cases of CN to evaluate active bone remodeling at various time courses of CN. PET/CT imaging in all 3 cases demonstrated focal uptake of 18F-NaF in the bones of the feet afflicted with CN, with bone retention of 18F-NaF persisting for up to 5 years following surgical reconstruction of the foot in two cases. On a group level, 18F-NaF bone uptake in the CN foot was significantly higher compared to the healthy, non-CN foot (p = 0.039). 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging may provide a non-invasive tool for monitoring active bone remodeling in the setting of CN, thereby offering novel opportunities for tracking disease progression and improving treatment and surgical intervention.

Keywords: bone remodeling; charcot; computed tomography; positron emission tomography; sodium fluoride.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Tram, Chou, Patel, Ettefagh, Go, Atway and Stacy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multimodality imaging evaluation of a 65-year old male patient with a history of Charcot foot, type 2 DM, and PAD. X-rays acquired at (A) the time of external fixation and (B) 5 years after surgery reveal the architecture of the foot. (C) Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and (D) axial, sagittal, and coronal 18F-NaF PET/CT images of the foot 5 years after surgery demonstrate focal increased uptake of 18F-NaF in the bones of the foot, indicating ongoing physiological remodeling of the afflicted foot 5 years after surgical reconstruction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Imaging assessment of a 49-year old female patient with a history of right foot Charcot deformity. X-rays were acquired at (A) the time of navicular bone removal and (B) 5 years after surgical reconstruction of the foot. (C) MIP and (D) PET/CT images acquired 5 years after surgery revealed heterogeneous boney uptake of 18F-NaF and suggested potential for ongoing remodeling of the foot.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Imaging evaluation of 40-year old male patient with history of Charcot joint of the right ankle. (A) X-rays acquired 9 months after surgical reconstruction revealed stable bone architecture. (B) MIP and (C) PET/CT images acquired 9 months after surgery demonstrated focal uptake of 18F-NaF in the region of the surgically reconstructed ankle impacted by CN, suggesting ongoing remodeling of the bones of the ankle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CT image-guided segmentation of the bones of the foot and quantitative 18F-NaF PET/CT image analysis. (A) Semiautomated segmentation of the bones of the foot and ankle (bone VOI outlined in red). (B) Quantitative analysis of PET/CT imaging demonstrated significantly higher bone uptake of 18F-NaF in the CN foot compared to the healthy non-CN foot. N = three patients. Values represent means ± SD.

References

    1. Cates NK, Elmarsafi T, Akbari CM, Tefera E, Evans KK, Steinberg JS, et al. . Complications of Charcot reconstruction in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Foot Ankle Surg. (2021) 60:941–5. 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.039
    1. Bandeira MA, Dos Santos ALG, Woo K, Gamba MA, de Gouveia Santos VLC. Incidence and predictive factors for amputations derived from Charcot's neuroarthropathy in persons with diabetes. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. (2021). 10.1177/15347346211025893. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Dodd A, Daniels TR. Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2018) 100:696–711. 10.2106/JBJS.17.00785
    1. Ha J, Hester T, Foley R, Reichert ILH, Vas PRJ, Ahluwalia R, et al. . Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. (2020) 11:357–68. 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.03.025
    1. Rosskopf AB, Loupatatzis C, Pfirrmann CWA, Boni T, Berli MC. The Charcot foot: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. (2019) 10:77. 10.1186/s13244-019-0768-9
    1. Evans KK, Attinger CE, Al-Attar A, Salgado C, Chu CK, Mardini S, et al. . The importance of limb preservation in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications. (2011) 25:227–31. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2011.02.001
    1. McCabe CJ, Stevenson RC, Dolan AM. Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme. Diabet Med. (1998) 15:80–4. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199801)15:1<80::AID-DIA517>;2-K
    1. Ergen FB, Sanverdi SE, Oznur A. Charcot foot in diabetes and an update on imaging. Diabet Foot Ankle. (2013) 4:21884. 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.21884
    1. Ledermann HP, Morrison WB. Differential diagnosis of pedal osteomyelitis and diabetic neuroarthropathy: MR imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. (2005) 9:272–83. 10.1055/s-2005-921945
    1. Peterson N, Widnall J, Evans P, Jackson G, Platt S. Diagnostic imaging of diabetic foot disorders. Foot Ankle Int. (2017) 38:86–95. 10.1177/1071100716672660
    1. Crerand S, Dolan M, Laing P, Bird M, Smith ML, Klenerman L. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in neuropathic foot ulcers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. (1996) 78:51–5. 10.1302/0301-620X.78B1.0780051
    1. Schauwecker DS, Park HM, Burt RW, Mock BH, Wellman HN. Combined bone scintigraphy and indium-111 leukocyte scans in neuropathic foot disease. J Nucl Med. (1988) 29:1651–5.
    1. Poirier JY, Garin E, Derrien C, Devillers A, Moisan A, Bourguet P, et al. . Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot with a 99mTc-HMPAO leucocyte scintigraphy combined with a 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy. Diabetes Metab. (2002) 28:485–90.
    1. Palestro CJ, Love C, Tronco GG, Tomas MB, Rini JN. Combined labeled leukocyte and technetium 99m sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging for diagnosing musculoskeletal infection. Radiographics. (2006) 26:859–U228. 10.1148/rg.263055139
    1. Palestro CJ, Mehta HH, Patel M, Freeman SJ, Harrington WN, Tomas MB, et al. . Marrow versus infection in the Charcot joint: indium-111 leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. (1998) 39:346–50.
    1. Palestro CJ, Roumanas P, Swyer AJ, Kim CK, Goldsmith SJ. Diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection using combined in-111 labeled leukocyte and Tc-99m Sc marrow imaging. Clin Nucl Med. (1992) 17:269–73. 10.1097/00003072-199204000-00001
    1. Basu S, Chryssikos T, Houseni M, Malay DS, Shah J, Zhuang HM, et al. . Potential role of FDG PET in the setting of diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy: can it differentiate uncomplicated Charcot's neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection? Nucl Med Commun. (2007) 28:465–72. 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328174447f
    1. Hopfner S, Krolak C, Kessler S, Tiling R, Brinkbaumer K, Hahn K, et al. . Preoperative imaging of Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetic patients: comparison of ring PET, hybrid PET, and magnetic resonance imaging. Foot Ankle Int. (2004) 25:890–5. 10.1177/107110070402501208
    1. Rastogi A, Bhattacharya A, Prakash M, Sharma S, Mittal BR, Khandelwal N, et al. . Utility of PET/CT with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled autologous leukocytes for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis in patients with Charcot's neuroarthropathy. Nucl Med Commun. (2016) 37:1253–9. 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000603
    1. Ruotolo V, Di Pietro B, Giurato L, Masala S, Meloni M, Schillaci O, et al. . A new natural history of charcot foot clinical evolution and final outcome of stage 0 charcot neuroarthropathy in a tertiary referral diabetic foot clinic. Clin Nucl Med. (2013) 38:506–9. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318292eecb
    1. Czernin J, Satyamurthy N, Schiepers C. Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition. J Nucl Med. (2010) 51:1826–9. 10.2967/jnumed.110.077933
    1. Mabray MC, Brus-Ramer M, Behr SC, Pampaloni MH, Majumdar S, Dillon WP, et al. . (18)F-Sodium fluoride PET-CT hybrid imaging of the lumbar facet joints: tracer uptake and degree of correlation to CT-graded arthropathy. World J Nucl Med. (2016) 15:85–90. 10.4103/1450-1147.174698
    1. Graf C, Huellner M, Tschopp O, Bode-Lesniewska B, Schmid C. (18)F-NaF-PET/CT in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and brown tumors. J Bone Miner Metab. (2020) 38:299–309. 10.1007/s00774-019-01059-z
    1. Araz M, Aras G, Kucuk ON. The role of 18F-NaF PET/CT in metastatic bone disease. J Bone Oncol. (2015) 4:92–7. 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.08.002
    1. Chou TH, Stacy MR. Clinical applications for radiotracer imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia. Mol Imaging Biol. (2020) 22:245–55. 10.1007/s11307-019-01425-3
    1. U.S. National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine Website, . Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease. (2021). Available online at: (accessed December 22, 2021).

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi