The effect of primary delivery of the anterior compared with the posterior shoulder on perineal trauma: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Hanne Willer, Anna J M Aabakke, Lone Krebs, Hanne Willer, Anna J M Aabakke, Lone Krebs

Abstract

Background: Approximately 85% of vaginal deliveries are accompanied by perineal trauma. The objective of this trial is to compare the incidence and degree of perineal trauma after primary delivery of the anterior compared with the posterior shoulder during vaginal birth. The hypothesis is that primary delivery of the posterior shoulder reduces the rate and degree of perineal trauma.

Methods/design: This is a single-centre, randomized controlled trial, with computer-generated randomization in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Women planning their first vaginal delivery (n = 650) are randomized to primary delivery of either the anterior or posterior shoulder. The primary outcome is any perineal trauma. Additional outcomes are the perineal injury subtypes, postpartum bleeding, umbilical artery pH, Apgar score at 5 minutes and any neonatal birth trauma. Perineal trauma is assessed by a midwife or doctor blinded to the method of shoulder delivery. All midwives are trained in the two methods of shoulder delivery and in the grading of perineal tears. The trial is being undertaken at a Danish community hospital with 1,600 yearly deliveries. Data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Recruitment started in January 2013 and the trial is planned to proceed for 24 months.

Discussion: Most delivery assistance techniques are based on tradition and heritage and lack objective evidence. This trial provides an example of how vaginal delivery techniques can be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. The results of this trial will clarify the role that delivery of the shoulders has on perineal trauma and thereby provide knowledge to recommendations on birthing technique.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01937546.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary delivery of (A) anterior shoulder and (B) posterior shoulder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time schedule and flow of participants. GA, gestational age (weeks); t, time.

References

    1. Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D. Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain. Birth. 1999;26:11–17. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00011.x.
    1. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van AH, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, Elbourne D. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:1262–1272. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10004.x.
    1. Kindberg S. Hvor stor risiko er der for at få en bristning. .
    1. Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, Reinar LM. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12 CD006672.
    1. Radestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E, Rubertsson C. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Birth. 2008;35:98–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00222.x.
    1. Williams A, Herron-Marx S, Carolyn H. The prevalence of enduring postnatal perineal morbidity and its relationship to perineal trauma. Midwifery. 2007;23:392–403. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.12.006.
    1. Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59–67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-59.
    1. Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthoj S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:59. e1–6.
    1. Stedenfeldt M, Oian P, Gissler M, Blix E, Pirhonen J. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme. BJOG. 2014;121:83–91. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12274.
    1. Laine K, Pirhonen T, Rolland R, Pirhonen J. Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1053–1057. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.
    1. Hals E, Oian P, Pirhonen T, Gissler M, Hjelle S, Nilsen EB, Severinsen AM, Solsletten C, Hartgill T, Pirhonen J. A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:901–908. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77a.
    1. Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001649.
    1. Downe S. In: Myles Textbook for Midwives. 15. Fraser D, Cooper MA, Myles MF, editor. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. The transition and the second stage of labour: physiology and the role of the midwife; pp. 509–530.
    1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editor. Williams Obstetrics. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009. Normal labor and delivery; pp. 374–409.
    1. Sokol RJ, Blackwell SC. ACOG practice bulletin: shoulder dystocia. Number 40, November 2002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;80:87–92.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder Dystocia. Green-top Guideline No. 42. .
    1. Grimm MJ, Costello RE, Gonik B. Effect of clinician-applied maneuvers on brachial plexus stretch during a shoulder dystocia event: investigation using a computer simulation model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:339–335.
    1. Kettle C, Tohill S. Perineal care. Clin Evid (Online) 2011;2011:1401.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. Green-top Guideline No. 29. .
    1. Statens Serum Institut. Dataformidling: Sygehusfødsler og komplikationer. .
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Kan håndgreb forhindre indgreb? .
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals: roles and responsibilities of authors, contributors, reviewers, editors, publishers, and owners: defining the role of authors and contributors. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi