このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Study the Impact of the CommunityRx Program on Health, Self-care and Cost

2022年5月9日 更新者:University of Chicago

Evaluating CommunityRx, a Self-Care Innovation for Older Adults, Using Agent-Based Modeling: Collecting and Analyzing Data to Build the Agent Based Model

CommunityRx is a health information technology-based innovation that, starting with the patient-health care provider encounter, facilitates self-care coordination for patients, caregivers, and providers. The CommunityRx database interfaces with electronic medical records to provide patients with a "HealtheRx." A HealtheRx is a list of community-based self-care resources tailored to the patients health needs (e.g., a person with diabetes receives information about podiatrists, nutrition classes, and other resources need to manage diabetes). CommunityRx aims to measurably improve health and health care while reducing health care costs especially in underserved health care settings. Specifically, the proposed research aims to 1) evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, cost, health, and patient-centered outcomes for program participants compared to controls; 2) examine the flow and spread of information to and through primary agents including: program participants, community health information experts, healthcare providers, and community-based service providers (businesses and organizations providing self-care resources); and 3) build and use an agent-based model to test the distributed impact, including economic effects, of CommunityRx system adoption on the demonstration area and predict performance over time by conducting experiments that vary assumptions about agent, environment, and population-level characteristics.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

CommunityRx connects health care to self-care. CommunityRx begins with the medical encounter and functions like an e-prescribing system, modeled after medication e-prescribing.9 Rather than sending a medication prescription to the patient's pharmacy, a HealtheRx "prescription" is automatically generated at the point of care, delivered to the patient in paper (or electronic) form and stored in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for future reference. The HealtheRx is ontologically-generated, driven by standard demographic (eg. age, gender, address, language) data fields in the EMR and customized to patient problems/diagnoses like "homelessness," or "obesity." Like e-prescribing medicine, CommunityRx involves prescribing, fulfillment (patient signs up for a Weight Watchers class), and administration (patient participates in the weight loss program) (Fig. 2).10 The HealtheRx prescription is the primary information agent in the system, driven by simple ontologic rules that generate complexity, including iteration of the CommunityRx system itself, as human agents interact with the self-care information.

CommunityRx can be best understood as part of a complex adaptive system. The HealtheRx, in contrast to a drug prescription, is designed specifically to enhance the interpersonal aspect of the patient-physician encounter, informing both agents about self-care resources. A patient receives a HealtheRx and then contacts a Community Health Information Specialist (CHIS) or not. She seeks self-care resources or not.

Data captured by the CommunityRx system about patient referrals and needs are distributed to community-based service providers (CBSPs) in the form of quarterly reports delivered to CBSP contacts cultivated by CHIS. These data efficiently reveal to CBSPs real-time needs and gaps in self-care resources. The investigators hypothesize these data will be used by CBSPs over time to ensure supply. Youth who generate community resource data through employment with MAPSCorps also gain insight to community resources and engage with CBSP personnel and CHIS as they gather their data. Youth spread information to their networks about community resources and increase their use of these resources. MAPSCorps data about community resources are shared publicly (www.healtherx.org, www.southsidehealth.org, www.dondeesta.org). Self-care becomes more efficient. Supply meets demand. Patients and providers have more time and resources to devote to other salubrious activities and CBSPs become stronger. Over time, transparency in the market for self-care resources increases competition and quality.

This hypothetical dynamic is an example of emergent self-organization from a complex adaptive system. The intervention starts with a simple encounter, governed by simple rules, between patient and health care provider. As the number of these encounters grow, previously siloed sectors - health care and self-care - evolve a new kind of formation that is far more efficient for the community than the current state. CommunityRx drives this new formation through multiple agents who are unaware of the complexity they are producing: "…the self-organized structure simply emerges as a result of each individual doing their own thing, independently." In evaluating the economic effects of CommunityRx adoption, agent-based modeling (ABM) can test how close the attractor state, or end-point in a CommunityRx system configuration (set of assumed behaviors and designed interventions), comes to a Pareto efficient point of equilibrium. The effects of the CommunityRx intervention are non-linear, involve interactions and feedback loops, and therefore require a complex system modeling approach for evaluation.

A. Purpose or Hypothesis

Data inputs for agent based modeling (ABM) can come from a range of sources, including empirical quantitative and qualitative data, data from the literature, and expert opinion. Because CommunityRx targets people of all ages (0-99 yrs, to date), a prospective, experimental, community-based design (eg. RCT) to assess outcomes by age strata would be very informative about patient agents (the investigators expect age-group differences in behavior, social networks, and outcomes) but cost-prohibitive. ABM can accommodate assumptions made based on this important, but specific, population subgroup (or "testbed"), includes many agents, and allows for multiple simulations to assess the impact of variations in those assumptions for the much larger and more diverse population that the system-wide model includes. A cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to understand the true economic impact of CommunityRx on the total cost of the burden of disease. In addition, the research team brings clinical and research expertise and specialized interest in middle-age and older adult populations with chronic disease. Focusing on this subgroup builds on this track record and will meaningfully extend our contributions to the gerontology and geriatrics fields.

Specifically, the aims (and associated hypotheses) of this research include:

Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, cost, health, and patient-centered outcomes for program participants (patients who receive care at the clinical demonstration sites and live in an 16 zip code area) compared to controls (patients who receive health care at the demonstration sites, but live outside the 16 zip code area), with a special focus on middle-age and older adults.

Aim 1a. Evaluate the impact of CommunityRx on health care utilization, health care costs, and on health outcomes for program participants (patients who receive care at the clinical demonstration sites and live in an 16 zip code area) compared to controls (patients who receive health care at the demonstration sites, but live outside the 11 zip code area) of all ages. NOTE: This aim is funded separately and registered on clinicaltrials.gov separately (see ID 1C1CMS330997).

Hypothesis: CommunityRx will decrease emergency/inpatient care utilization, decrease percent per beneficiary per year (%PBPY) costs and improve health.

Aim 1b. Evaluate the impact of the CommunityRx system on patient-centered outcomes in a randomized control trail of 200 program participants ages 45-74 and compared to 200 controls.

Hypothesis: CommunityRx will be associated with clinically meaningful improvements in: a) self-care behavior; b) perceived care quality; and c) quality of life.

Aim 1c. Characterize the economic value of care augmented with the CommunityRx system compared to usual care, based on the prospective participant-control study described in Aim 1b.

Hypothesis: Compared to usual care, care augmented with the CommunityRx system will be as cost-effective as commonly accepted medical devices and treatments.

Aim 2. Examine the flow and spread of information to and through primary agents including: program participants, community health information specialists, healthcare providers, and community-based service providers (businesses and organizations providing self-care resources).

Hypotheses: 1) Among the CBSPs receiving high volumes of CommunityRx referrals for people ≥45 years old (>1000/year), CommunityRx will produce a self-reported increase in: a) knowledge of community resources especially for older adults, b) referrals to other CBSPs, c) older client volume, and d) aging-related goods/services /programs inventory; and 2) Delivery of the CommunityRx intervention at the point of medical care produces knowledge about self-care resources in the community that spreads to secondary agents including members of patient and provider social networks.

Aim 3. Build and use an agent-based model to test the distributed impact, including economic effects, of CommunityRx adoption on the demonstration area and predict performance over time by conducting experiments that vary assumptions about agent, environment, and population-level characteristics.

Hypotheses: 1) The system-level value of CommunityRx is greater than the value quantified as %PBPY health care utilization savings and is projected to increase with population aging; 2) Experiments run on a systems-based model will predict and quantify the impact of strategies to optimize CommunityRx performance for improvements, sustainability, and spread to other settings; and 3) Systems-Based Modeling is an effective and efficient tool for large-scale evaluation of a health information technology-based intervention to improve health and health care.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

411

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Illinois
      • Chicago、Illinois、アメリカ、60637
        • University of Chicago Medicine - Adult Emergency Department and Primary Care Group clinic

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

45年~74年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 45-74 years old
  • Medicaid and/or Medicare beneficiary
  • Living in 1 of the 16 zip codes served by CommunityRx
  • Seen at University of Chicago primary care or emergency department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recollection of previous receipt of a HealtheRx

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:Control arm
The control group will receive usual care, no HealtheRx.
実験的:Intervention arm
The intervention arm will receive the intervention, a HealtheRx, which includes a list of resources in their community tailored to their health needs.
The HealtheRx is an informational intervention. The HealtheRx is generated and administered at the point of care. It includes a list of community resources, tailored to a patient's needs based on diagnoses, that are located near the patient's home. A health care provider and/or administrative staff administers and reviews the HealtheRx with the patient.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Mental Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months
時間枠:Assessed at Baseline, 1 Week, 1 Month and 3 Months; score at 3 months reported
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) . Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better mental health.
Assessed at Baseline, 1 Week, 1 Month and 3 Months; score at 3 months reported

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change From Baseline in Cost Effectiveness at 3 Months
時間枠:Baseline, 3 months
Using claims data and self-reported data on heath care utilization, we will use data from intervention baseline and at 3 months following the intervention to assess the cost effectiveness of HealtheRx.
Baseline, 3 months
Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
時間枠:Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported here
Patient satisfaction will be measures using the domain of general satisfaction from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18)
Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported here
Physical Health-related Quality of Life at 3 Months
時間枠:Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Minimum value=0, maximum value=100. Higher scores equal better physical health.
Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; 3 months reported
Self-efficacy - Finding Places and Services in Community to Manage Health as Measured by Questionnaire
時間枠:Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; score at 3 months reported
Measure confidence in ability to find services to take care of health
Assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months; score at 3 months reported

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Access to Resources - Weight Loss Class or Support Group as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to weight loss classes or support groups
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Healthy Eating Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to health eating classes
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Counseling as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to counseling
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Smoking Cessation Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to smoking cessation classes
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Stress Management Classes as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to stress management classes
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Access to Resources - Rent/Mortgage as Measured by Questionnaire Developed for This Study
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure perceived and self-reported access to help paying rent or mortgage
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Smoking Cessation as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure confidence in ability to quit smoking
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Weight as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure confidence in ability to manage weight
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Eating Healthy as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure confidence in ability to eat healthy
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Self-efficacy - Exercise as Measured by Questionnaire Based on Healthy People 20/20 and Applies Likert Scale
時間枠:Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months
Measure confidence in ability to exercise
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Stacy T Lindau, MD, MAPP、University of Chicago

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2015年12月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2016年12月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2017年12月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2015年4月17日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2015年4月30日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2015年5月6日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2022年5月11日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2022年5月9日

最終確認日

2022年5月1日

詳しくは

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

健康行動の臨床試験

3
購読する