Effectiveness of Implementing Shared Decision-Making on Quality of Care Among Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
Effectiveness of Implementing Shared Decision-Making on Quality of Care Among Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trail
Background:
Shared decision making (SDM) is a patient-centered and evidence-based model of clinical decision making. The feature of SDM is that clinicians work together with patients to plan the most appropriate and practical treatment for patients based on the patients' preferences and values. Recently, SDM has been implemented throughout the world to improve patients' health literacy and to have a better understanding of the treatment options, thereby improving patient-doctor communication and promoting the quality of care.
Lumbar degenerative disease is a critical public health issue in the aging society. SDM now becomes an important process because there is no consensus of evidence-based practice guidelines among the multiple complex treatment options for patients with lumbar degenerative disease. In addition, there is a lack of evidence to support the effect of patient decision aids (PDAs) to promote the quality of healthcare for patients with lumbar degenerative disease in Taiwan.
Purposes:
This project has two purposes. The first purpose is to develop a multimedia interactive patient doctor communication system called the Taiwan Shared Decision Making for Lumbar Spine Treatment (Taiwan SDM LumST). The second and ultimate purpose is to conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) for the validation of the integrated SDM model and the effectiveness of SDM related outcome indicators.
Methods:
In the first year of the 3-year project, investigators will develop the SDM communication teaching materials, PDAs, as well as the computerized platform of Taiwan SDM LumST through focus groups and consensus meetings. In the second to third year, investigators will recruit 130 patients with lumbar degenerative disease to participate in double blind cRCT in the affiliated hospitals of Taipei Medical University. Investigators will use structural equation modeling to validate the factors of the SDM model and adopt generalized linear regression models with generalized estimating equations to examine the immediate, short-term, and long-term benefits of the Taiwan SDM LumST in implementing the SDM model among patients with lumbar degenerative disease.
Expected results:
Investigators expect that the implementation of the Taiwan SDM LumST system will significantly improve the patients' decision preference, health literacy in the care of lumbar degenerative disease, and self-efficacy in SDM. It will also promote the health care quality and health outcomes (e.g., participation in SDM, quality of decisions, regret in decisions, health outcomes, and quality-of-life) in patients with lumbar degenerative disease.
Expected impacts on the society, economy, and academic developments:
The Taiwan SDM LumST will be an efficient and effective way to facilitate patient doctor communication and thereby, promote health outcomes and improve the quality of decisions made by patients with lumbar degenerative disease. No computerized interactive PDA of SDM system for patients with lumbar degenerative disease exists in Taiwan yet. Thus, our system would be the first in Taiwan for the lumbar degenerative population. Investigators hope that the Taiwan SDM LumST will not only contribute to academic research, but also facilitate SDM between patients and healthcare professionals in order to improve patient safety and enhance the quality of care in Taiwan.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Taipei、台湾
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- First-time diagnosis of Spine Degeneration Diseases ICD-10 codes M48.05-08, M43.05-08, M43.15-18, M54.5; ICD-9 codes 724.01-02、724.09、724.2、738.4
- Ability to follow instructions and complete the interviews
- Age>20 years
- Interested to participate and able to sign consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination scores<24)
- Having major mental diseases (i.e., depression, dementia, delirium, etc.)
- Inability to read/answer questionnaires
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:他の
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
---|---|
介入なし:いつものケアグループ
介入なし、通常のケアを続けるだけ
|
|
実験的:SDM intervention group
Using shared decision making support tool for intervention
|
Health education materials containing treatments and questions about patient values to help patients make the most appropriate decisions
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
The Change of Patients' Control Preference
時間枠:Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Use Control Preference Scale to measure the patients' preferred role whether change in making decisions with the medical provider before intervention and after intervention.
It consists of five cards, each of which presents a different character in medical decision-making in a cartoon pattern, and performs a series of comparisons to rank the preference.
|
Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
The Change of Patients' Decision Self-efficacy
時間枠:Before intervention, after intervention immediately, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Use Decision Self Efficacy Scale to measure patients' self-confidence and belief in measuring the ability of patients to participate in decision-making.
It has 11 items with 5 level Likert scale.
The scale range is 0-100, higher scores indicate better decision self-efficacy.
|
Before intervention, after intervention immediately, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Assess Decision Process Quality in Making the Decision
時間枠:After intervention immediately
|
Assess whether the medical personnel have sufficiently communicated with patients when making the decision by 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire(SDM-Q-9).
It has 9 items and is divided into 0 to 5 scores, 0 points = very disagree, 1 point = roughly disagree, 2 points = partial disagreement, 3 points = partial consent, 4 points = roughly agree, 5 points = very agree.
After the total score of each question is added, the initial total score is 0 to 45 points.
Divide the initial total score by 9 and multiply by 20 to get the final score from 0 to 100.
The higher the score means the better the decision-sharing on behalf of the patient.
|
After intervention immediately
|
Assess Patients' Satisfaction With Decision
時間枠:After intervention immediately, up to 12 weeks after the intervention
|
Use Satisfaction with Decision Scale to assess patients satisfaction with health care decisions.
It has 6 items with 5 level Likert scale. 1 point = very disagree, 2 points = disagree, 3 points = disagree or disagree, 4 points = agree, 5 points = very agree.
After the total score of each question is added, the initial total score is 6 to 30 points.
The higher the score, patients are more satisfied with the decision.
|
After intervention immediately, up to 12 weeks after the intervention
|
Assess Patients' Decisional Conflict
時間枠:After intervention immediately and up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Use the Decisional Conflict Scale to assess patients whether have a conflict or something not sure about making the decision.
It has 16 items with 5 levels Likert scale.
0 points = yes, 1 point = about yes, 2 points = uncertainty, 3 points = probably not, 4 points = no.
After the total score of each question is added, the initial total score is 0 to 64 points.
Divide the initial total score by 16 and multiply by 25 to get the final score from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, patients have more conflict with the decision.
|
After intervention immediately and up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Assess the Degree of Disability of Lower Back Pain
時間枠:Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Use the Oswestry Disability Index to measure lower back pain patients' degree of disability.
It has 10 items (Pain, self-care, bring, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex, social, travelling).
After adding up the total score of each item, the initial total score is 0 to 50 points.
Then divide the total score by 5 and multiply by 20 to get the final score of 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate a more severe disability.
|
Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Assess the Quality of Healthy Living About Patients
時間枠:Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
Use the EQ-5D-5L scale to measure patients' quality of healthy living.
It has 5 items (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, Depression/anxiety).
Each item contains 5 levels: 1= no difficulty, 2= slight difficulty, 3= moderate difficulty, 4= serious difficulty, 5= extremely serious difficulty.
The higher the score has the worse the health.
Then, the score calculation of the European Five-Dimensional Health Scale is based on the calculation formula published by the EuroQol Group.
Based on 5 combinations of different severity levels, a score of 0 to 1 is obtained.
0 is the least healthy and 1 is the most healthy.
|
Before intervention, up to 12 weeks after intervention
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- N201712035
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
Shared decision making support toolの臨床試験
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)募集
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); Brigham and Women's Hospital完了
-
Bispebjerg HospitalOdense University Hospital; Rigshospitalet, Denmark; Danish Cancer Society; Nordsjaellands Hospital と他の協力者完了
-
Bispebjerg HospitalDanish Cancer Society; Home care nursing in the Municipality of Gentofte; Home care nursing in... と他の協力者積極的、募集していない
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Goethe University; RWTH Aachen University; Technical University... と他の協力者募集