このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Prospective, Randomized, Assessor-Blinded, Multicenter Study Comparing Avance Nerve Graft and Autograft for Functional Recovery Following Mixed and Motor Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction (Nerve-RESTORE℠)

2026年6月15日 更新者:Axogen Corporation
This is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized, prospective, comparative study in participants requiring reconstruction of a mixed or motor nerve in the upper extremity. This study will consist of a screening visit, an operative visit, and 9 post-operative follow-up visits at Week 4, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized, prospective, evaluator blinded, comparative study in participants requiring reconstruction of a mixed or motor nerve in the upper extremity. The study will assess recovery of motor and sensory function via MRCC score for nerve repairs with Avance Nerve Graft (Study Treatment) and sural nerve autograft (Comparator) through non-inferiority analyses. Participants will be considered enrolled to the study once all screening and eligibility criteria have been met and the participant has been centrally randomized to either Avance Nerve Graft or sural nerve autograft; Inclusion and exclusion criteria are defined at decision points for pre-operative screening eligibility and operative eligibility. This study will consist of a screening visit, an operative visit, and 9 post-operative follow-up visits at Week 4, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

178

段階

  • フェーズ 4

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis、Indiana、アメリカ、46260
        • 募集
        • OrthoIndy
        • コンタクト:
        • 主任研究者:
          • Brandon Smetana, MD

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Study Participant Criteria

  1. Be ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent;
  2. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the treatment and evaluation schedule over a 24-month duration;
  3. Provide documented Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures;

    Injury/Repair Criteria for Each Nerve

  4. Primary or secondary nerve injury repair with sural nerve autograft or Avance Nerve Graft for fully transected reconstruction of the following upper extremity mixed and/or motor nerve(s):

    • Median nerve: proximal nerve stump within 20 cm from the center point of the thenar eminence and distal to the crease of the elbow;
    • Anterior interosseous nerve;
    • Median nerve recurrent motor branch;
    • Radial nerve: proximal nerve stump within 20 cm of the center of the forearm (midpoint between the tip of the olecranon and the styloid process) and distal to the mid-humerus;
    • Posterior interosseous nerve.
  5. Zone of injury of eligible nerve(s) resectable to healthy nerve both distally and proximally and within the anatomical regions of Inclusion Criterion #4;
  6. In study participants with multiple eligible nerve repairs, repair of all eligible nerves completed with the same study treatment, either Avance Nerve Graft or sural nerve autograft;
  7. Measured nerve gap(s) following resection > 25 mm;
  8. Nerve(s) repaired ≤ 120 days post injury;
  9. Undergo coaptation on both the proximal and distal portion of the nerve gap(s) per the USPI for Avance Nerve Graft and per standard of care for sural nerve autograft; and
  10. Either treatment method, Avance Nerve Graft or sural nerve autograft, is a viable option for all eligible nerve repair(s) (i.e., volume of injured nerve[s] does not exceed availability of sural nerve autograft for reconstruction, study participants are not treated with a combination of treatment types).

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Participant Criteria

  1. Currently enrolled in another clinical study that may interfere with treatment, assessment of recovery, or participation in this study;
  2. Deformities or injuries of the limb, hand, or digits that affect both the primary and secondary assessments for eligible nerve repair(s);
  3. History of neuropathy of any etiology, diabetic neuropathy or any other known neuropathy including compressive/traumatic neuropathies affecting the target limb;
  4. History of progressive neurodegenerative or autoimmune disorder affecting peripheral nerve or motor function (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease);
  5. History of chronic ischemic condition of the upper extremity;
  6. Expected use of medication during the study that is known to impact nerve regeneration or to cause peripheral neuropathy;
  7. Undergoing or expected to undergo treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other known treatment which affects the growth of neural and/or vascular systems;
  8. Participant is unlikely to comply with all study requirements and standard medical care procedures for the duration of the study schedule;

    Injury/Repair Criteria for Each Nerve

  9. Median nerve repairs where the ulnar nerve has been transected due to injury or repair;
  10. Repair(s) of a sensory-only proximal nerve stump;
  11. Incomplete nerve transections;
  12. Multilevel nerve injury pattern requiring two or more isolated reconstructions along the nerve pathway (for example, reconstruction of median nerve in forearm and recurrent motor branch resulting in repair pattern of graft to native nerve to graft to distal target);
  13. Inadequate soft tissue coverage or extensive soft tissue injury which will impair recovery assessment;
  14. Nerve avulsion injuries and nerve traction injuries resulting in rupture of the nerve;
  15. Replantation/amputation of the limb, hand, or digits involved in both the primary and secondary assessments for eligible nerve repair(s);
  16. Nerve repairs utilizing either end-to-side or side-to-side coaptation techniques;
  17. Nerve transfer, tendon transfer, or other concomitant treatment at the time of nerve repair that affects assessment of function of the innervated muscle organ;
  18. Use of coaptation devices that include metallic components or activated polymers and coaptations completed with fibrin glue only; and
  19. Injuries with vascular damage resulting in inadequate perfusion despite repair (i.e., both radial and ulnar arteries injured [one injured artery is allowed]).

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Avance Nerve Graft
Study Treatment: Avance Nerve Graft repairs of mixed or motor nerves (> 25 mm gaps)
A commercially available, sterile, single-use peripheral nerve scaffold indicated for the treatment of functional deficits, manufactured from decellularized and sterilized extracellular matrix derived from human peripheral nerve tissue.
他の名前:
  • Acellular nerve allograft-arwx
アクティブコンパレータ:Sural nerve autograft
Comparator: Sural nerve autograft repairs of mixed or motor nerves (> 25 mm gaps)
A patient's own peripheral nerve tissue harvested in a secondary surgical procedure of the lower extremity where a functioning sural nerve is sacrificed for use in the reconstruction of a nerve defect.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Recovery of motor function
時間枠:Assessed at 24 months
Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) of motor recovery score. This is an ordinal scale from M0-M5, with grade M0 meaning no contraction and M5 meaning full recovery in all muscles.
Assessed at 24 months
Recovery of sensory function
時間枠:Assessed at 24 months
Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) of sensory recovery score. This is an ordinal scale from S0-S4, with grade S0 meaning absence of sensibility in the autonomous area and S4 meaning complete recovery (2-point discrimination, 2-6 mm).
Assessed at 24 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Meaningful recovery (MR) of motor and sensory function
時間枠:Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) of motor recovery score. Meaningful recovery is defined as ≥ M3 MRCC of motor recovery and ≥ S3 MRCC of sensory recovery.
Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Treatment response (TR) of motor and sensory function
時間枠:Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) of motor recovery score. Treatment response is defined as a 1-point increase in MRCC score from post-operative baseline.
Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Time to MR of motor and sensory function
時間枠:Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Time from surgery to meaningful recovery of motor function in all repairs and of sensory function in mixed nerve repairs.
Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Time to TR of motor and sensory function
時間枠:Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
Time from surgery to treatment response of motor function in all repairs and of sensory function in mixed nerve repairs.
Assessed at Week 4, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, Month 24
QuickDASH upper extremity disability score
時間枠:Assessed at 24 months
The QuickDASH questionnaire (including Work and Sports/Performance Art modules if applicable) is a PROM questionnaire to measure physical functions and symptoms in participants with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders and will be used to assess the study participant's functional quality of life (QoL)as it pertains to the affected arm. This 11-item questionnaire addresses arm-specific symptoms and disability during the preceding week and is used to estimate the participant's view of disability. Each item is based on an ordinal scale from 1 to 5, where higher values are worse. QuickDASH scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating no disability and a score of 100 representing the most severe disability.
Assessed at 24 months
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score
時間枠:Assessed at 24 months
The LEFS is a valid and reliable assessment for documenting function for individuals and groups with injury or disability to the lower extremity. It is based on the World Health Organization's model of disability and handicap and is applicable to a wide variety of participants with lower extremity orthopedic conditions, including participants with a range of disability levels, conditions, diseases, treatments, and ages. Applicable to sural nerve autograft group only. The LEFS consists of 20 questions, with each activity rated from 0 (extremely difficult or unable) to 4 (no difficulty). Scores range from 0 to 80, where higher scores indicate better lower limb function.
Assessed at 24 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:R. Glenn Gaston, MD、OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年6月12日

一次修了 (推定)

2030年12月5日

研究の完了 (推定)

2030年12月5日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年6月15日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月15日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月18日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月18日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月15日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

はい

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

末梢神経損傷の臨床試験

Avance Nerve Graftの臨床試験

購読する