Detection of Colorectal Adenoma by Optical Enhancement Technology vs. High-Definition Colonoscopy
Detection of Colorectal Adenoma by Optical Enhancement Technology vs. High-Definition Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Conditie
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world.Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening test for colorectal cancer.There are also emerging data to support that screening by colonoscopy reduces both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer.However,Colonoscopy could still miss colorectal adenomas and even cancer.The miss rate for colonic adenomas was reported to be ranging from 15 to 32% in tandem colonoscopy studies.The reasons for the miss rate may be technical(insufficient during excessively fast instrument withdrawal),but may also be the imaging method.Smaller lesions ,particularly flat ones ,may be missed as a result of their subtle appearance and limited contrast in relation to the surrounding mucosa.
Some image-enhanced modules were developed with an aim to improve colorectal polyp or adenoma detection.The widely available modules is the narrow band imaging(NBI).However,most studies failed to demonstrate any superiority of NBI system over white light colonoscopy in detecting colonic polyps.NBI provides dimmer images of the colonic mucosa ,which may limit its performance on polyp and adenoma detection.
Like NBI,OE technology is image-enhanced module,providing a more intense look at the vascular pattern morphology.Besides,OE technology provides an much brighter image compared to NBI.This may possibly increase polyp detection by enhancing visibility of the colonic mucosa with brighter image.The current study aims to tested whether OE technology would improve adenoma detection when compared with high-definition colonoscopy.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Verwacht)
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients were selected if they presented for diagnostic colonoscopy for a variety of indications(eg positive fecal occult blood test, abdominal pain, diarrhoea,post-polypectomy surveillance).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with prior resection of the proximal colon, advanced colonic cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndrome.
- The cecum could not be intubated.
- Inadequate bowel preparation (Aronchick Bowel Preparation Scale score poor or inadequate).
- Biopsies were not available.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Preventie
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Opdracht voor een enkele groep
- Masker: Enkel
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Actieve vergelijker: Group A
white light was used for both insertion and withdrawal of the colonoscope
|
|
|
Experimenteel: Group B
Insertion to cecum was performed under white light and once the cecum was reached,the OE mode was swithed on during withdrawal of endoscope for complete colonic examination
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|
|
adenoma detection rate
Tijdsspanne: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Onderzoekers
- Studie directeur: Yanqing Li, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
Publicaties en nuttige links
Algemene publicaties
- Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008 Jan;57(1):59-64. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.123539. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
- Aminalai A, Rosch T, Aschenbeck J, Mayr M, Drossel R, Schroder A, Scheel M, Treytnar D, Gauger U, Stange G, Simon F, Adler A. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2383-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.273. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start
Primaire voltooiing (Verwacht)
Studie voltooiing (Verwacht)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- 2016SDU-QILU-11
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .