- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT07615582
Clinical Performance and Multitasking in Anesthesia : a Simulation-based Study (FOCUS)
Cognitive failure under multitasking conditions has been demonstrated in various settings, including healthcare. However, in anesthesiology, the impact of multitasking on clinical performance has not yet been fully characterized.
The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of multitasking on anesthesiologists' clinical performance in a simulated setting.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
This study is a prospective, single-center, non-interventional study. The study was classified as non-interventional by the institutional research committee, as the intervention consists of simulation training and the study population comprises healthcare practitioners.
The study participants are anesthesiologists, including attending physicians and residents. Each participant will serve as their own control. The study will comprise two visits: one intervention visit consisting of a multitasking simulation session, and one control visit involving clinical questions administered under quiet conditions. The order of the visits will be randomized between participants using a crossover design in order to minimize potential learning bias.
The multitasking condition will consist of performing manual mask ventilation on a manikin while answering oral clinical questions administered in the form of Script Concordance Tests (SCTs). Participants will be instructed to ventilate the manikin with a tidal volume of 500 mL and a respiratory rate of 15 breaths/minute.
Clinical reasoning under quiet conditions will consist of answering oral clinical questions in the SCT format.
The study will use a 44-item Script Concordance Test (SCT) distributed across 20 anesthesiology clinical vignettes. The vignettes are distributed as follows: 8 vignettes with 3 items, 8 vignettes with 2 items, and 4 vignettes with 1 item. The vignettes were adapted, without modification of their content, to be compatible with oral administration and the simulation scenario.
In addition, for each participant, the SCT clinical vignettes will be randomized between the "simulation vignettes" and the "control vignettes," with stratification according to the number of items per vignette. Five vignettes will be allocated to the intervention condition and fifteen to the control condition. This approach will help limit the effect of differences in vignette difficulty that could otherwise bias the results. At the group level, all clinical vignettes will ultimately be assessed in both the simulation and control conditions.
Detailed information is available in the study protocol.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Geschat)
Contacten en locaties
Studiecontact
- Naam: Jean-Noël Evain, MD, PhD
- Telefoonnummer: +33476766829
- E-mail: jnevain@chu-grenoble.fr
Studie Contact Back-up
- Naam: Caroline Sanchez, PhD
- Telefoonnummer: 0476766829
- E-mail: csanchez5@chu-grenoble.fr
Studie Locaties
-
-
-
Grenoble, Frankrijk, 38700
- Werving
- Centre d'Évaluation et de Simulation Alpes Recherche (CESAR)
-
Contact:
- Jean-Noël Evain, MD, PhD
- Telefoonnummer: 0476766829
- E-mail: jnevain@chu-grenoble.fr
-
Contact:
- Alexis Lesage, MD
- Telefoonnummer: 0476766829
- E-mail: ALesage@chu-grenoble.fr
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
- Volwassen
- Oudere volwassene
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Bemonsteringsmethode
Studie Bevolking
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anesthesiology and intensive care resident or attending physician
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Concordance score with the expert panel on a Script Concordance Test (SCT)
Tijdsspanne: At two time points: - During simulation session under multitasking conditions - During control visit under quiet conditions
|
Each item of the SCT is scored out of 1 point, and the sum of the points, converted to a 100-point scale, defines the percentage of concordance with the expert panel.
|
At two time points: - During simulation session under multitasking conditions - During control visit under quiet conditions
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to answer items of the script concordance test (seconds)
Tijdsspanne: Two time points: intervention and control.
|
Time between end of question and beggining of answer for each item of the script concordance test. Evaluates the interruption lag. |
Two time points: intervention and control.
|
|
Manual ventilation performance assessed by variance of expiratory tidal volume (ml)
Tijdsspanne: - Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
Participants will be instructed to ventilate with an expiratory tidal volume (Vte) between 450 and 500 mL at a respiratory rate of 15 breaths per minute.
Variability in Vte will be used as an indicator of the difficulty in complying with these instructions.
|
- Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
|
Manual ventilation performance assessed by variance of respiratory rate (cycles/minute)
Tijdsspanne: - Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
Participants will be instructed to ventilate with an expiratory tidal volume (Vte) between 450 and 500 mL at a respiratory rate of 15 breaths per minute.
Variability in respiratory rate will be used as an indicator of the difficulty in complying with these instructions.
|
- Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
|
Cognitive load assessed by the NASA-TLX index (score out of 100)
Tijdsspanne: A two time points: - Evaluating cognitive load of manual ventilation alone, before simulation after training. - Evaluation cognitive load of multitasking, at the end of the simulation session
|
The Official NASA Task Load Index (TLX) is a subjective workload assessment tool.
By incorporating a multi-dimensional rating procedure, NASA TLX derives an overall workload score based on a weighted average of ratings on six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, frustration.
|
A two time points: - Evaluating cognitive load of manual ventilation alone, before simulation after training. - Evaluation cognitive load of multitasking, at the end of the simulation session
|
Andere uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploratory sub-group analysis of the primary outcome measure
Tijdsspanne: Two time points: intervention and control.
|
Subgroups:
|
Two time points: intervention and control.
|
|
Exploratory subgroup analyses of expiratory tidal volume variance and respiratory rate variance
Tijdsspanne: - Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
Subgroups:
|
- Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions
|
|
Descriptive analysis of ventilation parameters
Tijdsspanne: Training phase (baseline), simulation phase (ventilation-only and ventilation plus clinical questions)
|
|
Training phase (baseline), simulation phase (ventilation-only and ventilation plus clinical questions)
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Publicaties en nuttige links
Algemene publicaties
- Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, Dunsmuir WT, Day RO. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65.
- Sujka JA, Safcsak K, Bhullar IS, Havron WS 3rd. Simulation-Based Testing of Pager Interruptions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1351-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
- Murji A, Luketic L, Sobel ML, Kulasegaram KM, Leyland N, Posner G. Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4499-504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4782-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
- McCurdie T, Sanderson P, Aitken LM. Traditions of research into interruptions in healthcare: A conceptual review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
- Adams TN, Rho JC. Multitasking simulation: Present application and future directions. Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):120-122. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230666. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
- Jackson KM, Shaw TH, Helton WS. Evaluating the dual-task decrement within a simulated environment: Word recall and visual search. Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103861. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103861. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
- Gui JL, Nemergut EC, Forkin KT. Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110110. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- RNIPH-2026-CESAR-FOCUS
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Beschrijving IPD-plan
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .