Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

The Prevalence Of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction In Patients With Lumbar Disc Hernia

29. mai 2019 oppdatert av: Hilal Telli, European University of Lefke

A Cross-sectional Study of Patients, Who Diagnosed Lumbar Disc Hernia With or Without Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

In this study evaluated the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia and examined the variations in clinical parameters cause by this combination.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests, pain levels with a Visual Analog Scale, and the presence of neuropathic pain using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale. Other clinical assessments were performed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Sample Size A power analysis using the formula n= t2pq / d2 was performed to determine the sample size. Based on those data the investigators concluded that a minimum of 174 and a maximum of 322 patients would be required to achieve significant results, and 234 patients were enrolled.

Statistical Analysis The study data were expressed as mean plus standard deviation (SD) for constant variables values and as number and percentage for categoric variables. The chi-square test was used to analyze categoric variables. Results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval at a significance level of p˂0.05. The analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 16.0 software.

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline has been implemented in this manuscript.

Studietype

Observasjonsmessig

Registrering (Faktiske)

234

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

20 år til 60 år (Voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Prøvetakingsmetode

Sannsynlighetsprøve

Studiepopulasjon

Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. 63.2% of patients were female and 36.8% were male. Mean age was 46.72 ± 11.14 years.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 20 - 60 years old
  • Diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation
  • To have sufficient cognitive level to fill clinical evaluation forms
  • The patient agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar pain, the etiology of which was suspected to be inflammatory in character
  • Structural vertebral deformity or fracture
  • The severe and progressive neurological deficit
  • A history of severe psychiatric disease
  • Substance and/or alcohol dependence, with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), malignancy, spinal infection
  • A history of vertebral surgery
  • Pregnancy

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

Kohorter og intervensjoner

Gruppe / Kohort
Intervensjon / Behandling
The group with sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Andre navn:
  • Livskvalitet
  • Pain level
  • Presence of neuropathic pain
  • Functional capacity
  • Presence of depression
  • Presence of kinesiophobia
The group without sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient without sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Andre navn:
  • Livskvalitet
  • Pain level
  • Presence of neuropathic pain
  • Functional capacity
  • Presence of depression
  • Presence of kinesiophobia

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Evaluation the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia
Tidsramme: 1 day
During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests. Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
1 day
Examination of the level of pain caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Tidsramme: 1 day
All patients were evaluated in terms of pain threshold measurements using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The patient is asked to mark the severity of the pain on a horizontal or vertical 10 cm line. It is defined as 0 no pain, 5 moderate pain, 10 is the most severe pain encountered in life.
1 day
Examination the presence of depression caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Tidsramme: 1 day

The presence of depression was evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression.

Each answer is scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

In this study evaluated that there is no depression between 0 and 13 points, a moderate depression of 14-24 points, and a severe depression of more than 25 points.

1 day
Effect on the quality of life this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia: Health Assessment Questionnaire
Tidsramme: 1 day
Quality of life was performed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire.The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was originally developed in 1978 by James F. Fries, MD, and colleagues at Stanford University. The domain of disability is assessed by the eight categories of dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. Discomfort is determined by the presence of pain and its severity. Each answer is rated 0-3. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) is a questionnaire that reflects the functional status, and its score is correlated with disease activity indicators.
1 day
Examination the presence of kinesiophobia caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Tidsramme: 1 day
The presence of kinesiophobia was evaluated using the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale.The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)that was developed in 1990 is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of Kinesiophobia or fear of movement. The original questionnaire was developed to "discriminate between non-excessive fear and phobia among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain''. The TSK is a self-completed questionnaire and the range of scores are from 17 to 68 where the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of Kinesiophobia.
1 day

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Hilal Telli, MD, European University of Lefke

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

22. januar 2015

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

16. april 2015

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

16. april 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

24. mai 2019

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

28. mai 2019

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

29. mai 2019

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

31. mai 2019

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

29. mai 2019

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2019

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

IPD-planbeskrivelse

From an ethical point of view, this data should remain between the doctor and the patients. Therefore a plan is not created.

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere