The Prevalence Of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction In Patients With Lumbar Disc Hernia
A Cross-sectional Study of Patients, Who Diagnosed Lumbar Disc Hernia With or Without Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Przegląd badań
Status
Interwencja / Leczenie
Szczegółowy opis
Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests, pain levels with a Visual Analog Scale, and the presence of neuropathic pain using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale. Other clinical assessments were performed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
Sample Size A power analysis using the formula n= t2pq / d2 was performed to determine the sample size. Based on those data the investigators concluded that a minimum of 174 and a maximum of 322 patients would be required to achieve significant results, and 234 patients were enrolled.
Statistical Analysis The study data were expressed as mean plus standard deviation (SD) for constant variables values and as number and percentage for categoric variables. The chi-square test was used to analyze categoric variables. Results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval at a significance level of p˂0.05. The analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 16.0 software.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline has been implemented in this manuscript.
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Metoda próbkowania
Badana populacja
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 20 - 60 years old
- Diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation
- To have sufficient cognitive level to fill clinical evaluation forms
- The patient agreed to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lumbar pain, the etiology of which was suspected to be inflammatory in character
- Structural vertebral deformity or fracture
- The severe and progressive neurological deficit
- A history of severe psychiatric disease
- Substance and/or alcohol dependence, with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), malignancy, spinal infection
- A history of vertebral surgery
- Pregnancy
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
Kohorty i interwencje
Grupa / Kohorta |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
The group with sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
|
Inne nazwy:
|
|
The group without sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient without sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
|
Inne nazwy:
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia
Ramy czasowe: 1 day
|
During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests.
Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
|
1 day
|
|
Examination of the level of pain caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Ramy czasowe: 1 day
|
All patients were evaluated in terms of pain threshold measurements using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The patient is asked to mark the severity of the pain on a horizontal or vertical 10 cm line.
It is defined as 0 no pain, 5 moderate pain, 10 is the most severe pain encountered in life.
|
1 day
|
|
Examination the presence of depression caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Ramy czasowe: 1 day
|
The presence of depression was evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression. Each answer is scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. In this study evaluated that there is no depression between 0 and 13 points, a moderate depression of 14-24 points, and a severe depression of more than 25 points. |
1 day
|
|
Effect on the quality of life this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia: Health Assessment Questionnaire
Ramy czasowe: 1 day
|
Quality of life was performed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire.The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was originally developed in 1978 by James F. Fries, MD, and colleagues at Stanford University.
The domain of disability is assessed by the eight categories of dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities.
Discomfort is determined by the presence of pain and its severity.
Each answer is rated 0-3.
The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) is a questionnaire that reflects the functional status, and its score is correlated with disease activity indicators.
|
1 day
|
|
Examination the presence of kinesiophobia caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Ramy czasowe: 1 day
|
The presence of kinesiophobia was evaluated using the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale.The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)that was developed in 1990 is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of Kinesiophobia or fear of movement.
The original questionnaire was developed to "discriminate between non-excessive fear and phobia among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain''.
The TSK is a self-completed questionnaire and the range of scores are from 17 to 68 where the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of Kinesiophobia.
|
1 day
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Sponsor
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Hilal Telli, MD, European University of Lefke
Publikacje i pomocne linki
Publikacje ogólne
- van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B. Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2784-96. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00011.
- Madani SP, Dadian M, Firouznia K, Alalawi S. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with herniated lumbar disc: a cross-sectional study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(3):273-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130376.
- Chou LH, Slipman CW, Bhagia SM, Tsaur L, Bhat AL, Isaac Z, Gilchrist R, El Abd OH, Lenrow DA. Inciting events initiating injection-proven sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Med. 2004 Mar;5(1):26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04009.x.
- Prather H, Hunt D. Conservative management of low back pain, part I. Sacroiliac joint pain. Dis Mon. 2004 Dec;50(12):670-83. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2004.12.004. No abstract available.
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)
Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- The Prevalence Of SJD
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Opis planu IPD
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .