Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

The Prevalence Of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction In Patients With Lumbar Disc Hernia

29 maggio 2019 aggiornato da: Hilal Telli, European University of Lefke

A Cross-sectional Study of Patients, Who Diagnosed Lumbar Disc Hernia With or Without Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

In this study evaluated the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia and examined the variations in clinical parameters cause by this combination.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests, pain levels with a Visual Analog Scale, and the presence of neuropathic pain using the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale. Other clinical assessments were performed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Sample Size A power analysis using the formula n= t2pq / d2 was performed to determine the sample size. Based on those data the investigators concluded that a minimum of 174 and a maximum of 322 patients would be required to achieve significant results, and 234 patients were enrolled.

Statistical Analysis The study data were expressed as mean plus standard deviation (SD) for constant variables values and as number and percentage for categoric variables. The chi-square test was used to analyze categoric variables. Results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval at a significance level of p˂0.05. The analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 16.0 software.

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline has been implemented in this manuscript.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

234

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 20 anni a 60 anni (Adulto)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Metodo di campionamento

Campione di probabilità

Popolazione di studio

Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. 63.2% of patients were female and 36.8% were male. Mean age was 46.72 ± 11.14 years.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 20 - 60 years old
  • Diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation
  • To have sufficient cognitive level to fill clinical evaluation forms
  • The patient agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar pain, the etiology of which was suspected to be inflammatory in character
  • Structural vertebral deformity or fracture
  • The severe and progressive neurological deficit
  • A history of severe psychiatric disease
  • Substance and/or alcohol dependence, with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), malignancy, spinal infection
  • A history of vertebral surgery
  • Pregnancy

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
The group with sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Altro: Evaluation of the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc herniation
Altri nomi:
  • Qualità della vita
  • Pain level
  • Presence of neuropathic pain
  • Functional capacity
  • Presence of depression
  • Presence of kinesiophobia
The group without sacroiliac joint dysfunction
The patient without sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Altro: Evaluation of the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc herniation
Altri nomi:
  • Qualità della vita
  • Pain level
  • Presence of neuropathic pain
  • Functional capacity
  • Presence of depression
  • Presence of kinesiophobia

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Evaluation the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia
Lasso di tempo: 1 day
During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests. Positivity in three out of six provocation tests was adopted as a criterion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
1 day
Examination of the level of pain caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Lasso di tempo: 1 day
All patients were evaluated in terms of pain threshold measurements using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The patient is asked to mark the severity of the pain on a horizontal or vertical 10 cm line. It is defined as 0 no pain, 5 moderate pain, 10 is the most severe pain encountered in life.
1 day
Examination the presence of depression caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Lasso di tempo: 1 day

The presence of depression was evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression.

Each answer is scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

In this study evaluated that there is no depression between 0 and 13 points, a moderate depression of 14-24 points, and a severe depression of more than 25 points.
1 day
Effect on the quality of life this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia: Health Assessment Questionnaire
Lasso di tempo: 1 day
Quality of life was performed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire.The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was originally developed in 1978 by James F. Fries, MD, and colleagues at Stanford University. The domain of disability is assessed by the eight categories of dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. Discomfort is determined by the presence of pain and its severity. Each answer is rated 0-3. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) is a questionnaire that reflects the functional status, and its score is correlated with disease activity indicators.
1 day
Examination the presence of kinesiophobia caused by this combination which with sacroiliac joint dysfunction in lumbar disc hernia
Lasso di tempo: 1 day
The presence of kinesiophobia was evaluated using the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale.The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)that was developed in 1990 is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of Kinesiophobia or fear of movement. The original questionnaire was developed to "discriminate between non-excessive fear and phobia among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain''. The TSK is a self-completed questionnaire and the range of scores are from 17 to 68 where the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of Kinesiophobia.
1 day

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

European University of Lefke

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Hilal Telli, MD, European University of Lefke

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

22 gennaio 2015

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

16 aprile 2015

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

16 aprile 2015

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

24 maggio 2019

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

28 maggio 2019

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

29 maggio 2019

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

31 maggio 2019

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

29 maggio 2019

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2019

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • The Prevalence Of SJD

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

From an ethical point of view, this data should remain between the doctor and the patients. Therefore a plan is not created.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi