Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of INI101 Compared to BOTOX® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

1. juni 2026 oppdatert av: INIBIO Co., Ltd.

A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel, Active-controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection INI101 Compared to BOTOX® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for injection INI101 compared to BOTOX® in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

292

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult male or female participants aged between 19 and 65 years old.
  2. Participants whose glabellar line score was 2 (moderate) or higher of glabellar line score at maximum frown based on the investigator's judgment at screening and randomization.
  3. Participants who voluntarily gave a consent in writing to participate in the clinical study with full knowledge of details of the study after listening to them.
  4. Participants who can understand and comply with the procedures and visit schedules of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, hereditary motor neuropathy, etc.)
  2. History of blepharoplegia or ptosis
  3. Prominent facial asymmetry
  4. Glabellar lines that are physically difficult to be improved, such as the case where the lines are not removed by hands
  5. Participants who have received any drugs that can act as a systemic muscle relaxant within 4 weeks prior to screening
  6. Participants who have received anticoagulants, anti-platelet agents, or systemic NSAIDs within 7 days prior to administration of investigational products (however, low-dose aspirin [325 mg/day or less] administered for antithrombotic purposes is acceptable)
  7. Participants who have participated in other clinical trials of a drug/medical device within 30 days from participating in this clinical study and have been administered/treated with the investigational product/medical device
  8. Participants deemed ineligible for this study for other reasons based on the investigator's judgment

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Dobbelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Botulinum toxin type A (INI101)
Single administration, Day 0, 20 units
Aktiv komparator: Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX®)
Enkeltadministrasjon, Dag 0, 20 enheter

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4
Investigator assessed the subject's glabellar lines 'At maximum frown' on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS) after 4 weeks of the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline, based on the Photo Guidelines for Glabellar Line Evaluation.
Baseline to week 4

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 8, 12, 16
Investigator assessed the subject's glabellar lines 'At maximum frown' on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS) at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline, based on the Photo Guidelines for Glabellar Line Evaluation.
Baseline to week 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Investigator performed on-site assessment of the subject's glabellar lines 'At rest' on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS) at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline, based on the Photo Guidelines for Glabellar Line Evaluation.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the independent assessor's photo assessment
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Independent assessor assessed the subject's glabellar lines 'At maximum frown' ' on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS) at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline, based on the Photo Guidelines for Glabellar Line Evaluation. An independent assessor separately conducted the FWS assessment subsequently based on the photographs taken.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest according to the independent assessor's photo assessment
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Independent assessor assessed the subject's glabellar lines 'At rest' on a 4-point facial wrinkle scale (FWS) at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline, based on the Photo Guidelines for Glabellar Line Evaluation. An independent assessor separately conducted the FWS assessment subsequently based on the photographs taken.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines as assessed by the subject
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Subjects assessed their glabellar lines at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to baseline.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Subject's satisfaction
Tidsramme: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Subject's satisfaction score for the improvement of glabellar lines was investigated at each time point after the administration of the investigational product compared to before administration.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

27. mai 2021

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

30. januar 2022

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

5. mars 2022

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

26. mai 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

27. mai 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

2. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

3. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

1. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere