Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of INI101 Compared to BOTOX® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

May 27, 2026 updated by: INIBIO Co., Ltd.

A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel, Active-controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection INI101 Compared to BOTOX® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for injection INI101 compared to BOTOX® in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

292

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
        • INIBIO Co., Ltd.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult male or female participants aged between 19 and 65 years old.
  2. Participants whose glabellar line score was 2 (moderate) or higher of glabellar line score at maximum frown based on the investigator's judgment at screening and randomization.
  3. Participants who voluntarily gave a consent in writing to participate in the clinical study with full knowledge of details of the study after listening to them.
  4. Participants who can understand and comply with the procedures and visit schedules of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, hereditary motor neuropathy, etc.)
  2. History of blepharoplegia or ptosis
  3. Prominent facial asymmetry
  4. Glabellar lines that are physically difficult to be improved, such as the case where the lines are not removed by hands
  5. Participants who have received any drugs that can act as a systemic muscle relaxant within 4 weeks prior to screening
  6. Participants who have received anticoagulants, anti-platelet agents, or systemic NSAIDs within 7 days prior to administration of investigational products (however, low-dose aspirin [325 mg/day or less] administered for antithrombotic purposes is acceptable)
  7. Participants who have participated in other clinical trials of a drug/medical device within 30 days from participating in this clinical study and have been administered/treated with the investigational product/medical device
  8. Participants deemed ineligible for this study for other reasons based on the investigator's judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Botulinum toxin type A (INI101)
Single administration, Day 0, 20 units
Active Comparator: Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX®)
Single administration, Day 0, 20 units

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is improved by 2 points or more from baseline
Baseline to week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8, 12, 16
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is improved by 2 points or more from baseline
Baseline to week 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest according to the investigator's on-site assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is improved by 2 points or more from baseline
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at maximum frown according to the independent assessor's photo assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is improved by 2 points or more from baseline
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest according to the independent assessor's photo assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is improved by 2 points or more from baseline
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Improvement rate of glabellar lines as assessed by the subject
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
'Improvement' is defined as a case where the glabellar line score is +2, or +3, or +4.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participant-rated satisfaction after treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16
'Satisfied' is defined as a satisfaction assessment score of 6 or 7 on the improvement of the glabellar line.
Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glabellar Lines

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox]

Subscribe