- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07663045
Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Following Flapless Guided Versus Conventional Implant Placement
Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Following Flapless Guided Versus Conventional Implant Placement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography - A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.
Marginal bone preservation is an important determinant of long-term implant success. Conventional flap implant placement provides direct visualization of the surgical site but may disturb the periosteal blood supply and contribute to early crestal bone remodeling.
Flapless guided implant placement is a minimally invasive approach that aims to preserve soft tissue architecture and vascular integrity. CBCT allows three-dimensional evaluation of peri implant bone levels, including mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual aspects.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare flapless guided implant placement with conventional flap implant placement in terms of marginal bone loss, implant stability, postoperative pain, and soft-tissue healing.
Studieoversikt
Status
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Ajman Emirate
-
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, De forente arabiske emirater, 00000
- Gulf Medical University
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 20 years or older.
- Patients requiring at least two dental implants within the same arch.
- Patients with good general health and able to undergo oral surgery.
- Patients willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent.
- Patients with adequate bone volume for implant placement as determined by preoperative radiographic assessment (e.g., cone beam computed tomography).
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with systemic diseases that could compromise healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised conditions).
- Patients with a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck region.
- Patients with active periodontal disease or untreated oral infections.
- Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patients with a history of bisphosphonate therapy or other medications that may affect bone metabolism.
- Smoker Patients with a history of smoking or heavy alcohol consumption.
- Patients with unrealistic expectations or inability to comply with postoperative care instructions.
- Patients with significant facial trauma or anatomical deformities affecting the implant site.
- Patient who requires Immediate implant placement
- Thin gingival biotype
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
- Masking: Enkelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Flapless Guided Implant Placement
|
a minimally invasive dental implant procedure where a surgical guide, often created using advanced imaging techniques like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computer-aided design (CAD), directs the precise placement of dental implants without the need for traditional flap elevation.
|
|
Eksperimentell: Conventional Flap Implant Placement
|
manually raising the gingival tissue during dental implant surgery, this surgical procedure involves the placement of a dental implant directly into the alveolar or basal bone during a single session followed by the placement of a healing abutment without the use of surgical guides or advanced technology.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Bone Loss
Tidsramme: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
CBCT assessment
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Stability ISQ
Tidsramme: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Implant stability was assessed as a secondary outcome using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), which provides an objective and non-invasive measurement of implant stability expressed as the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Postoperative Pain Assessment VAS scale 0-10
Tidsramme: baseline, Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
|
VAS scale 0-10
|
baseline, Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- AbdallahMDSperio
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .