Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Comparison of Anterior Sciatic Nerve Block and Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

15 maja 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Ahmet Murat Yayik, Ataturk University

Comparison of Anterior Sciatic Nerve Block and Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane Block Added to Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is frequently associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain despite its arthroscopic nature, owing to the complex sensory innervation of the knee involving the femoral, sciatic, and obturator nerves. Multimodal analgesic strategies, particularly peripheral nerve blocks, are therefore widely used to improve postoperative pain control and reduce opioid consumption. Although anterior sciatic nerve block can be combined with adductor canal block in the supine position, its application may be technically challenging because of the deep localization of the sciatic nerve. Recently, adductor magnus muscle plane block has emerged as a potentially easier alternative by indirectly targeting the terminal branches of the sciatic nerve through fascial plane spread. In this study, we compared the efficacy of anterior sciatic nerve block and adductor magnus muscle plane block, both combined with adductor canal block.

Przegląd badań

Status

Zakończony

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

This single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial included 90 patients aged 18-45 years with ASA physical status I-II who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups to receive either adductor canal block alone (Group C), adductor canal block combined with anterior sciatic nerve block (Group ASB), or adductor canal block combined with adductor magnus muscle plane block (Group AMB). Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with concealed allocation through sealed opaque envelopes. Although the anesthesiologist performing the blocks was aware of group allocation, all postoperative assessments were conducted by an independent blinded investigator. All regional blocks were ultrasound-guided and performed preoperatively by the same experienced anesthesiologist using standardized techniques and local anesthetic volumes. Procedural characteristics, including block performance time, needle visibility, needle passes, and sonographic visibility of target structures, were systematically recorded. Sensory blockade was assessed at predefined intervals using cold-warm discrimination tests across multiple nerve distributions.

All patients received standardized spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, as well as a multimodal postoperative analgesic regimen including intravenous paracetamol, dexketoprofen, and fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement were evaluated at multiple time points during the first 24 hours, while cumulative fentanyl consumption, time to first PCA demand, and rescue analgesic requirements were recorded. Opioid-related adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, pruritus, dry mouth, and urinary retention, were also documented. In addition, postoperative motor function of the tibialis anterior and quadriceps femoris muscles was assessed using a three-point qualitative motor scale at predefined postoperative intervals up to 48 hours.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

90

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II,
  • Scheduled for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiovascular disease,
  • hepatic dysfunction,
  • coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulant therapy,
  • inability to cooperate,
  • known allergy to any of the study medications,
  • refusal to participate in the study

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Leczenie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Podwójnie

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Aktywny komparator: Adductor Canal Block
Participants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided adductor canal block using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Blocks will be performed under sterile ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist who will not participate in postoperative assessments. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative analgesia.
Procedura: Adductor canal block
Ultrasound transducer was placed perpendicular to the thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle, femoral artery and vein, and the adductor canal. Following infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge, 10-cm echogenic needle was advanced in-plane from lateral to medial toward the adductor canal. After confirming correct needle tip placement with 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Inne nazwy:
  • ACB
Aktywny komparator: Adductor Canal + Anterior Sciatic nerve block
Participants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided anterior sciatic nerve block (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) and adductor canal block (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Blocks will be performed under sterile ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist who will not participate in postoperative assessments. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative analgesia.
Procedura: Adductor canal block
Ultrasound transducer was placed perpendicular to the thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle, femoral artery and vein, and the adductor canal. Following infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge, 10-cm echogenic needle was advanced in-plane from lateral to medial toward the adductor canal. After confirming correct needle tip placement with 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Inne nazwy:
  • ACB
Procedura: Anterior sciatic nerve block
An ultrasound transducer was placed perpendicular to the anterior thigh. The sartorius muscle, femoral artery and vein, adductor longus muscle, adductor magnus muscle, and the sciatic nerve were identified. Following infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge, 10-cm echogenic needle was advanced toward the sciatic nerve under ultrasound guidance. Nerve stimulation was applied, and an appropriate motor response in the sciatic nerve distribution was obtained at 0.2-0.5 mA. After injection of 2 mL of 0.9% saline and visualization of perineural spread to confirm correct needle placement, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Inne nazwy:
  • ASB
Aktywny komparator: Adductor Canal + Adductor magnus plane block
Participants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided adductor magnus plane block (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) and an adductor canal block (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Blocks will be performed under sterile ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist who will not participate in postoperative assessments. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative analgesia.
Procedura: Adductor canal block
Ultrasound transducer was placed perpendicular to the thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle, femoral artery and vein, and the adductor canal. Following infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge, 10-cm echogenic needle was advanced in-plane from lateral to medial toward the adductor canal. After confirming correct needle tip placement with 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Inne nazwy:
  • ACB
Procedura: Adductor magnus plane block
An ultrasound transducer was placed perpendicular to the thigh to visualise the sartorius muscle, femoral artery and vein, adductor longus, and the underlying adductor magnus muscle. Following infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge, 10-cm echogenic needle was advanced until the posterior fascia of the adductor magnus muscle was penetrated. After injection of 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, correct needle placement was confirmed by observing fluid spread beneath the posterior surface of the adductor magnus muscle. Subsequently, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Inne nazwy:
  • AMB

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Opioid consumption
Ramy czasowe: 0-4 hours, 4-8 hours, 8-24 hours, Total 24-hour
Postoperative opioid consumption
0-4 hours, 4-8 hours, 8-24 hours, Total 24-hour

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Pain Scores (VAS) at Rest and During Movement
Ramy czasowe: PACU, 1st hour, 2nd hours, 4th hours, 8th hours, 12th hours, 24th hours
Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Assessments will be performed at rest and during movement at predefined postoperative time points.
PACU, 1st hour, 2nd hours, 4th hours, 8th hours, 12th hours, 24th hours
Adverse Effects
Ramy czasowe: up to 24 hours
Opioid-Related Adverse Effects
up to 24 hours
Evaluation of Nerve Blockade after Nerve Block Application
Ramy czasowe: 5., 10., 15., 20., 30., and 45. minutes

Post-block sensory assessment was performed at predefined time intervals using a cold-warm discrimination test.

Sensory evaluation was conducted at the plantar surface of the foot for the tibial nerve, the dorsal surface of the foot for the superficial peroneal nerve, the posterolateral aspect of the leg for the sural nerve, the posterior aspect of the thigh for the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve, and at the medial malleolus for the saphenous nerve.
5., 10., 15., 20., 30., and 45. minutes
Quadriceps and Anterior Tibialis Muscle Strength
Ramy czasowe: 4th hours, 8th hours, 12th hours, 24th hours, 48th hours
Muscle strength will be assessed using standardized manual muscle testing (paralysis/paresis/normal) for quadriceps and anterior tibialis muscles.
4th hours, 8th hours, 12th hours, 24th hours, 48th hours

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

Ataturk University

Śledczy

  • Krzesło do nauki: Samet Kapakin, Professor, Ataturk University

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 kwietnia 2024

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

1 marca 2026

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 kwietnia 2026

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

11 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

15 maja 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

22 maja 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

22 maja 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

15 maja 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Słowa kluczowe

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/761

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Adductor canal block

Wyszukaj podobne próby

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

CROs by country

CROs in Bangladesh

Warunki

Rzadkie choroby

Interwencje lekowe

Suplementy diety

Sponsor / Współpracownicy

Lokalizacje

Subskrybuj