Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

The Effects of Repetitive Paired Associative Stimulation in Dystonia

Investigating the Plastic Effects of Repetitive Paired Associative Stimulation (rPAS) in Dystonia

Background:

- People with dystonia have serious muscle contractions that cause abnormal movements or postures. This significantly affects their daily lives. The common type is called organic. The other type is psychogenic. People with this type have typical symptoms plus some psychological effects. Researchers will look at how rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain combined with stimulation of a nerve affects the ability to detect sensations. They will compare the responses of people with different types of dystonia. They will also compare the responses of people with dystonia to responses of people without it. This study may help us learn more about the nature of different types of dystonia.

Objectives:

- To see whether TMS combined with nerve stimulation affects the brain differently in people with different types of dystonia and those without dystonia.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals at least 18 years old, who are right-handed and have dystonia.
  • Healthy volunteers at least 18 years old.

Design:

  • Participants will have two clinical visits. Each visit will be a few hours long. They can be done on the same day.
  • Participants will be screened with a medical history and physical exam.
  • Participants will take several sensory tests. For these tests, electrodes will be placed on their skin. The participants will feel small electric shocks during some of the tests.
  • Participants will undergo TMS. For 2 minutes, quick electrical currents will pass through a wire coil placed on their head. As this happens, researchers will ask the participants to move certain muscles.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Descrição detalhada

Objective:

To investigate the effects of pairing brain and peripheral nerve stimulation in organic and psychogenic dystonia to see if this technique can differentiate them.

Study Population:

We intend to do an internal pilot study of 6 patients with organic dystonia, 6 patients with clinically definite psychogenic dystonia and 6 age-matched healthy volunteers. We will then perform an analysis to see how many subjects we need to prove or disprove a difference between groups.

Design:

Subjects will have a baseline screening visit, electromyography (EMG) and nerve stimulation, sensory threshold testing, and measurements of brain excitability using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). They will then undergo rapid TMS repetitively paired with stimulation of a nerve in the arm. Outcome variables will again be measured immediately after (T0), 30 minutes (T30) after, and 60 minutes (T60) after the end of brain stimulation.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome variable: Change in MEP amplitudes at T30 from baseline

Secondary outcome variables:

  • Input-output curve parameters (measured at baseline, T0, T30, and T60)
  • Temporal discrimination threshold (TDT)

Exploratory Measures

  • Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), a measure of inhibition in the motor cortex
  • Influence of Val66Met BDNF polymorphism on the output variables

Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) will be used to investigate the following three factors on the outcome variables: time (four levels: baseline, T0, T30 and T60) and muscle (two levels: APB and FDI) as within-subject factor and group (three levels: organic dystonia, psychogenic dystonia, and healthy controls) as between-subjects factor. The model of repeated measures ANOVA will include the interactions between the three factors. If the interaction between muscle and group is significant, the interaction between time and group will be evaluated for each muscle separately. If significance is found for time and/or group, then the evaluation will be followed by Tukey Kramer multiple pair-wise comparisons.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Real)

19

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos a 100 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:
  • For the organic dystonia group: Primary focal dystonia diagnosed or confirmed by a movement disorders neurologist, confirmed at the initial visit by a study investigator.
  • For the psychogenic dystonia group: Clinically established psychogenic dystonia or probable psychogenic dystonia, according to the Fahn and Williams criteria confirmed by a movement disorders neurologist.
  • For the healthy volunteers group: Age-matched healthy volunteers three will be age matched to pyschogenic dystonia group, and three will be age matched to organic dystonia group.
  • Adult patients (at least18 years old).
  • Right handed.
  • Ability to provide own consent

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Dystonia affecting the right APB and/or FDI, or inability of the subject to perform full range-of-motion exercises with the right FDI and/or APB.
  • Medical condition impairing the subject's ability to comply with the study protocol as judged by study investigator, such as but not limited to seizures, brain tumor, stroke, bipolar disorder, depression, hearing problem, uncontrolled systemic hypertension with values above 170/100, heart disease or lung disease, active respiratory disease needing intervention; and pain preventing lying still for up to 40 minutes.
  • Current or prior use of botulinum toxin within 3 months prior to TMS intervention.
  • Current or prior use of CNS drugs (including antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, anti-parkinsonian drugs, hypnotics, stimulants, and/or antihistamines) within 1 week prior to TMS intervention.
  • Active drug or alcohol intake more than 7 alcohol drinks/week for women and more than 14 alcoholic drinks/week for men.
  • Current pregnancy and lactating women. Menopausal status will be determined by the CNS IRB criteria. In women of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be performed at least 24 hours prior to TMS procedures.
  • Presence of implanted devices such as pacemakers, medication pumps or defibrillators, metal in the cranium except mouth, history of shrapnel injury or any other condition/device that may be contraindicated
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to provide written informed consent.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Perspectivas de Tempo: Prospectivo

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Prazo
Change from baseline in the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude at S50 after 30 minutes from rPAS (T30).
Prazo: 30 minutes from rPAS
30 minutes from rPAS

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

18 de junho de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

2 de agosto de 2016

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

2 de agosto de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

26 de junho de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de junho de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

28 de junho de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

14 de fevereiro de 2018

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de fevereiro de 2018

Última verificação

2 de agosto de 2016

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 130163
  • 13-N-0163

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

3
Se inscrever