Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Short-term Effects of an Inpatient Geriatric Consultation Team on Geriatric Syndrome Patients

13 de fevereiro de 2019 atualizado por: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

A Pilot Study of the Short-term Effects of an Inpatient Geriatric Consultation Team on Geriatric Syndrome Patients

Patients admitted to acute ordinary wards in a medical center in Southern Taiwan from an elder-integrated outpatient department or emergency room from January 2017 to December 2017 were included if they met the following criteria: (i) age 65 years or older, (ii) Barthel index score ≦60 and (iii) with at least one of the following geriatric syndromes: unsteady gait or easy-to-fall ( falls ≧ 2 in last 1 year), malnutrition with Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form screening score < 12, urinary incontinence, pressure sores, dementia, delirium, depression, polypharmacy (≧8 medications), and excessive utilization of healthcare facilities (admission≧2, visit Emergency≧2, or visit outpatient department≧12 in one month). Patients were excluded if they were in a vegetative state, under palliative care or terminally ill and suffering from acute illness needing to be transferred to or cared for in the Intensive Care Unit.

Human participant approval was obtained from the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board before data collection. Participants were recruited from the ordinary wards by research assistants who screened the admission list every morning if they met the inclusion criteria. Then, the detail of the research was explained to the patients and families. They were allowed to choose to be in the control group or the intervention group. After the participants and or family agreed, informed consent was signed. For those who were cognitively impaired or suffered from dementia, informed consent was signed by their relative or partner. For the intervention group, a geriatric physician was consulted and recommendations were made by the geriatric consultant after a complete geriatric assessment. Besides the geriatric physician, the investigator's multidisciplinary team included a social worker, nutritionist and physical therapist. In the control group, the participants only received routine hospital care and no geriatric physician was consulted.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Descrição detalhada

Participants were recruited from the ordinary wards by research assistants who screened the admission list every morning if they met the inclusion criteria. Then, the detail of the research was explained to the patients and families. They were allowed to choose to be in the control group or the intervention group. After the participants and or family agreed, informed consent was signed. For those who were cognitively impaired or suffered from dementia, informed consent was signed by their relative or partner. For the intervention group, a geriatric physician was consulted and recommendations were made by the geriatric consultant after a complete CGA. The CGA includes the assessment of depression, dementia, physical performance of Activity of Daily Living (ADL) and nutrition using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDC-15), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Barthel Index (BI), and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA®-SF) respectively. Besides the geriatric physician, our multidisciplinary team included a social worker, nutritionist and physical therapist. In the control group, the participants only received routine hospital care and no geriatric physician was consulted. The case manager nurse filed the participant's baseline data and clinical problems. After discharge, the participant's condition was assessed via telephone in the first, third and six months after discharge.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

59

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

65 anos e mais velhos (Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

(i) age 65 years or older, (ii) Barthel index (BI) [18] score ≦60 and (iii) with at least one of the following geriatric syndromes: unsteady gait or easy-to-fall ( falls ≧ 2 in last 1 year), malnutrition with Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA®-SF) screening score < 12, urinary incontinence, pressure sores, dementia, delirium, depression, polypharmacy (≧8 medications), and excessive utilization of healthcare facilities (admission≧2, visit Emergency≧2, or visit outpatient department≧12 in one month)-

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients were excluded if they were in a vegetative state, under palliative care or terminally ill and suffering from acute illness needing to be transferred to or cared for in the Intensive Care Unit.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: usual care
For the intervention group, a geriatric physician was consulted and recommendations were made by the geriatric consultant and inpatient geriatric consultation team after a complete geriatric assessment (CGA). The CGA includes the assessment of depression, dementia, physical performance of Activity of Daily Living (ADL) and nutrition using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDC-15), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Barthel Index (BI), and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA®-SF) respectively. Besides the geriatric physician, our multidisciplinary team included a social worker, nutritionist and physical therapist. In the control group, the participants only received routine hospital care and no geriatric physician was consulted.
For the intervention group, a geriatric physician was consulted and recommendations were made by the geriatric consultant after a complete CGA.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
readmission rate
Prazo: readmission rate within one month after discharge
compare the differences of readmission rates between the intervention and control groups
readmission rate within one month after discharge
readmission rate
Prazo: readmission rate within three months after discharge
compare the differences of readmission rates between the intervention and control groups
readmission rate within three months after discharge
readmission rate
Prazo: readmission rate within six months after discharge
compare the differences of readmission rates between the intervention and control groups
readmission rate within six months after discharge

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
mortality rate
Prazo: mortality rate within one month after discharge
compare the differences of mortality rates between the intervention and control groups
mortality rate within one month after discharge
mortality rate
Prazo: mortality rate within three months after discharge
compare the differences of mortality rates between the intervention and control groups
mortality rate within three months after discharge
mortality rate
Prazo: mortality rate within six months after discharge
compare the differences of mortality rates between the intervention and control groups
mortality rate within six months after discharge

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Song-Seng Loke

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2017

Conclusão Primária (Real)

31 de dezembro de 2017

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

31 de dezembro de 2017

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de janeiro de 2019

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

13 de fevereiro de 2019

Primeira postagem (Real)

15 de fevereiro de 2019

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de fevereiro de 2019

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de fevereiro de 2019

Última verificação

1 de dezembro de 2016

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

3
Se inscrever