Validação de Câmara Termográfica para Avaliação do Pé Diabético (HIK-DM-2026)
Validação de Câmara Termográfica para Avaliação do Pé Diabético
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Each participant is assessed in a single session in a thermally stable room at 20 to 25 degrees Celsius, with relative humidity recorded as a covariate. After 15 minutes of acclimatization in a semi-Fowler position with the backrest at 30 to 45 degrees, both cameras acquire plantar thermograms from a static tripod at a fixed distance of 75 cm, with the tripod head at 90 degrees to the plantar plane and an emissivity setting of 0.98. The two radiometric acquisitions are consecutive and always less than 10 seconds apart. The order of the cameras is randomized 1:1 at participant level (sequence A: M60 then Mini2 V2; sequence B: Mini2 V2 then M60), from a list generated in advance by a team member not involved in image acquisition and kept in a password-protected file until recruitment is complete. No specific background is used.
Thermograms are exported to HIKMICRO Analyzer version 2.0.1. Six anatomical regions of interest, defined a priori and identical for both cameras, are delimited on each foot: hallux, first, third and fifth metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel. There is no post-hoc region selection and no indexing to either device. Contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T) is computed per region as the absolute difference in mean temperature between homologous regions of the right and left foot.
Images are renamed with an alphanumeric code that removes any explicit reference to the source device before analysis, and regions are delimited by an independent evaluator blinded to the neurological status of the participant. Technical blinding is acknowledged as partial, because the difference in spatial resolution between the two cameras may allow a trained evaluator to infer the source device.
The sample size follows the method of Walter, Eliasziw and Donner for the intraclass correlation coefficient, with a null hypothesis of ICC0 = 0.65 against an alternative of ICC1 = 0.80, alpha = 0.05, nominal power 0.80 and two observations per participant, which yields a minimum of 77 participants. The study enrolls 130 participants, which raises the actual power for this contrast to 95.7 percent and absorbs expected losses.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Eduardo Luis Martín Javier
- Número de telefone: +34 647 773 675
- E-mail: eduardo@avanza-salud.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
-
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Espanha, 38201
- Clínica Avanza Salud
-
Contato:
- Eduardo Luis Martín Javier
- Número de telefone: +34 647 773 675
- E-mail: eduardo@avanza-salud.com
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Critérios de Inclusão:
- Idade igual ou superior a 18 anos.
- Diagnóstico de Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 ou Tipo 2.
- Capacidade de compreender e assinar o consentimento informado.
Critérios de Exclusão:
- Úlceras ativas nos pés.
- Cirurgia recente nos membros inferiores.
- Comprometimento cognitivo que impeça o seguimento do protocolo do estudo.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Diabetes patients
Adults with diagnosed type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, without active plantar ulceration, recruited from the active caseload of general podiatry and physiotherapy consultations.
|
Low-cost infrared thermographic camera (256 x 192 pixels, NETD below 40 mK) used solely as a measuring instrument.
It is not a medical device and no clinical decision is derived from its readings.
High-resolution infrared thermographic camera (640 x 480 pixels, NETD below 35 mK) used as a technical comparator.
It is not designated as a clinical or diagnostic reference standard.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement, ICC(A,1), between the two cameras for contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T) in each of six pre-specified plantar regions of interest
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Delta T is computed per region as the absolute difference in mean temperature between homologous regions of the right and left foot.
One ICC(A,1) is reported for each of the six regions defined a priori (hallux, first, third and fifth metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel), with its 95 percent confidence interval, using the McGraw and Wong (1996) formulation, equivalent to ICC(2,1) of Shrout and Fleiss (1979), two-way random effects, single measurement.
Each region contributes 130 paired measurements.
The study hypothesis is ICC greater than or equal to 0.80, tested against a null of ICC0 = 0.65.
Neither device is treated as a reference standard.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Cohen's Kappa for inter-device agreement in the binary classification of thermal asymmetry at the 2.2 degree Celsius cut-off, per region of interest
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Overall agreement proportion and Kappa with 95 percent confidence interval for the dichotomous classification Delta T greater than or equal to 2.2 degrees Celsius versus below it, in each of the six regions.
The cut-off is used as an operational category without clinical connotation, and neither device is designated as the diagnostic reference.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Consistency intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(C,1), between the two cameras for mean plantar temperature (Tmean)
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
McGraw and Wong (1996) consistency formulation, equivalent to ICC(3,1) of Shrout and Fleiss (1979), reported with its 95 percent confidence interval.
Exploratory endpoint with a hypothesis of ICC greater than or equal to 0.75.
It is not powered by an independent sample size calculation.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Bland-Altman systematic bias and 95 percent limits of agreement between the two cameras for mean plantar temperature (Tmean) and for contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T)
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Systematic bias and 95 percent limits of agreement computed across the six pre-specified plantar regions of interest, for both the mean plantar temperature and the contralateral thermal asymmetry.
Neither device is treated as a reference standard.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Influence of participant clinical variables on the magnitude of inter-device discordance
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
The absolute inter-device difference is analyzed against the presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy, body mass index and type of diabetes mellitus.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Image acquisition time
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Time elapsed from the end of the acclimatization period to the correct export of both thermograms, measured with a stopwatch for each participant and reported in seconds.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Proportion of technically valid thermograms
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Percentage of thermographic acquisitions that did not require repetition because of a technical error, namely defocus, participant movement or a saving failure.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Participant acceptability of the measurement protocol
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Number of participants answering yes to a single dichotomous question asked verbally at the end of the session, on whether they would consider repeating this procedure at a future appointment.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
|
Descriptive distribution of the maximum contralateral thermal asymmetry per participant
Prazo: Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Median and interquartile range reported separately for each camera.
This measure is descriptive only.
It is not the primary criterion and it is not indexed to either device.
|
Single measurement session (Day 1)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HIK-DM-2026-01
- CHUC_2026_24 (Outro identificador: CEIm Provincial de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .