Contemporary Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Amil M Shah, Brian Claggett, Dalane Kitzman, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jan Skov Jensen, Susan Cheng, Kunihiro Matsushita, Suma Konety, Aaron R Folsom, Thomas H Mosley, Jacqueline D Wright, Gerardo Heiss, Scott D Solomon, Amil M Shah, Brian Claggett, Dalane Kitzman, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jan Skov Jensen, Susan Cheng, Kunihiro Matsushita, Suma Konety, Aaron R Folsom, Thomas H Mosley, Jacqueline D Wright, Gerardo Heiss, Scott D Solomon

Abstract

Background: Although age-associated changes in left ventricular diastolic function are well recognized, limited data exist characterizing measures of diastolic function in older adults, including both reference ranges reflecting the older adult population and prognostically relevant values for incident heart failure (HF), as well as their associations with circulating biomarkers of HF risk.

Methods: Among 5801 elderly participants in the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; age range, 67-90 years; mean age, 76±5 years; 42% male; 21% black), we determined the continuous association of diastolic measures (tissue Doppler imaging [TDI] e', E/e', and left atrial size) with concomitant N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and subsequent HF hospitalization or death. We also determined sex-specific 10th and 90th percentile limits for these measures using quantile regression in 401 participants free of prevalent cardiovascular disease and risk factors.

Results: Each measure of diastolic function was robustly associated with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and incident HF or death. ARIC-based reference limits for TDI e' (4.6 and 5.2 cm/s for septal and lateral TDI e', respectively) were substantially lower than guideline cut points (7 and 10 cm/s, respectively), whereas E/e' and left atrial size demonstrated good agreement with guideline cut points. TDI e' was nonlinearly associated with incident HF or death, with inflection points for risk supportive of ARIC-based limits. ARIC-based limits for diastolic function improved risk discrimination over guideline-based cut points based on the integrated discrimination improvement (P<0.001) and continuous net reclassification improvement (P<0.001), reclassifying 42% of the study population as having normal diastolic function. We replicate these findings in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. With these limits, 46% had normal diastolic function and were at low risk of HF hospitalization or death (1%/y over a mean 1.7-year follow-up), 49% had 1 or 2 abnormal measures and were at intermediate risk (2.4%/y), and all 3 diastolic measures were abnormal in 5% who were at high risk (7.5%/y).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that left ventricular longitudinal relaxation velocity declines as a part of healthy aging and is largely prognostically benign. The use of age-based normative values when considering an elderly population improves the risk discrimination of diastolic measures for incident HF or death.

Keywords: diastole; echocardiography; epidemiology; heart failure; prognosis.

Conflict of interest statement

The other authors report no disclosures.

© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Restricted cubic splines demonstrating the continuous relationship between LV diastolic measures (TDI e’septal [panel A], TDI e’lateral [panel B], E/e’septal ratio [panel C], E/e’lateral ratio [panel D], LA A-P dimension [panel E], and LAVi [panel F]) and NT-proBNP levels assessed concomitantly at Visit 5 among ARIC participants without prevalent heart failure at Visit 5. Y-axis shows geometric mean values of NT-proBNP.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Restricted cubic splines demonstrating the continuous relationship between LV diastolic measures (TDI e’septal [panel A], TDI e’latera [panel B], E/e’septal ratio [panel C], E/e’lateral ratio [panel D], LA A-P dimension [panel E], and LAVi [panel F]) and incident HF hospitalization or death post-Visit 5.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Classification of diastolic measures in the overall ARIC study sample free of prevalent HF using ARIC-based reference limits compared to guideline-based cutpoints. Panel A: Prevalence of abnormal diastolic measures (TDI e’, E/e’, LAVi) by ARIC-based reference limits and guideline-based cutpoints in the overall study sample. Panel B: Prevalence of participant categories based on number of abnormal diastolic measures (TDI e’, E/e’, LAVi) and associated rates of incident HF hospitalization or death using either ARIC-based reference limits or guideline-based cutpoints.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever