Factorial Structure of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale (MESSi) and Sex and Age Invariance

Paula Vagos, Pedro F S Rodrigues, Josefa N S Pandeirada, Ali Kasaeian, Corina Weidenauer, Carlos F Silva, Christoph Randler, Paula Vagos, Pedro F S Rodrigues, Josefa N S Pandeirada, Ali Kasaeian, Corina Weidenauer, Carlos F Silva, Christoph Randler

Abstract

Assessing morningness-eveningness preferences (chronotype), an individual characteristic that is mirrored in daily mental and physiological fluctuations, is crucial given their overarching influence in a variety of domains. The current work aimed to investigate the best factor structure of an instrument recently presented to asses this characteristic: the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale improved (MESSi). For the first time, the originally proposed three-factor structure was pitched against a uni- and a two-factor solution. Another novelty was to establish that the best-fitting model would be invariant in relation to sex and age, two variables that influence chronotype. A Confirmatory Factor Analyses on the data obtained from a sample of 2096 German adults (age: 18-76; M = 25.5, SD = 7.64) revealed that the originally proposed three-factor structure of the MESSi - Morning Affect, Eveningness, and Distinctness - was the only one to achieve acceptable fit indicators. Furthermore, each scale obtained good internal consistency. In order to assess age invariance, following the literature on development and chronotype, our sample was divided into three age groups: 18-21 years, 22-31 years, and 32 years or older. Full measurement invariance of the three-factor model was found for sex and age. Regarding differences between sexes, females did not differ significantly from males in Morning Affect, but scored significantly lower on Eveningness and higher on Distinctness; this last result has been consistent across validation studies of the MESSi. With respect to age differences, the oldest group scored lower on Eveningness and Distinctness in comparison with the other two age-groups; the intermediate group (age: 22-31) scored lower on Morning Affect when compared to both the younger and older age groups. Additionally, both Eveningness and Distinctness were negatively correlated with age. This latter relation has been consistently reported in other validation studies. Our results reinforce the idea that the MESSi assesses three different components of chronotype in a reliable manner and that this instrument can be used to explore sex and age differences.

Keywords: MESSi; age-group invariance; distinctness; eveningness; morning affect; psychometric assessment; sex invariance; three-factor structure.

References

    1. Adan A., Almirall H. (1991). Horne & östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire: a reduced scale. Pers. Individ. Dif. 12 241–253. 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90110-W
    1. Adan A., Archer S. N., Hidalgo M. P., Milia L. D., Natale V., Randler C. (2012). Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol. Int. 29 1153–1175. 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971
    1. Baehr E. K., Revelle W., Eastman C. I. (2000). Individual differences in the phase and amplitude of the human circadian temperature rhythm: with an emphasis on morningness-eveningness. J. Sleep Res. 9 117–127. 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00196.x
    1. Brown F. M. (1993). Psychometric equivalence of an improved Basic Language Morningness (BALM) scale using industrial population within comparisons. Ergonomics 36 191–197. 10.1080/00140139308967872
    1. Caci H., Deschaux O., Adan A., Natale V. (2009). Comparing three morningness scales: age and gender effects, structure and cut-off criteria. Sleep Med. 10 240–245. 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.01.007
    1. Chen F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Modeling 14 464–504. 10.1080/10705510701301834
    1. Di Milia L. (2005). A psychometric evaluation and validation of the preferences scale. Chronobiol. Int. 22 679–693. 10.1080/07420520500180454
    1. Di Milia L., Adan A., Natale V., Randler C. (2013). Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures. Chronobiol. Int. 30 1261–1271. 10.3109/07420528.2013.817415
    1. Di Milia L., Randler C. (2013). The stability of the morning affect scale across age and gender. Pers. Individ. Diff. 54 298–301. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.031
    1. Díaz-Morales J. F., Randler C. (2017). Spanish adaptation of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability-Scale (MESSi). Span. J. Psychol. 20:e23. 10.1017/sjp.2017.21
    1. Diaz-Morales J. F., Randler C., Arrona-Palacios A., Adan A. (2017). Validation of the MESSi among adult workers and young students: general health and personality correlates. Chronobiol. Int. 34 1288–1299. 10.1080/07420528.2017.1361437
    1. Dimitrov D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 43 121–149. 10.1177/0748175610373459
    1. Dosseville F., Laborde S., Lericollais R. (2013). Validation of a chronotype questionnaire including an amplitude dimension. Chronobiol. Int. 30 639–648. 10.3109/07420528.2012.763042
    1. Fabbian F., Zucchi B., De Giorgi A., Tiseo R., Boari B., Salmi R., et al. (2016). Chronotype, gender and general health. Chronobiol. Int. 33 863–882. 10.1080/07420528.2016.1176927
    1. Faßl C., Quante M., Mariani S., Randler C. (2018). Preliminary findings for the validity of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability Scale improved (MESSi): correlations with activity levels and personality. Chronobiol. Int. 10.1080/07420528.2018.1519570 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Folkard S., Monk T. H., Lobuan M. C. (1979). Towards a predictive test of adjustment to shift work. Ergonomics 22 79–91. 10.1080/00140137908924591
    1. Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
    1. Horne J., Östberg O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int. J. Chronobiol. 4 97–110.
    1. Jankowski K. S. (2012). Morningness/eveningness and satisfaction with life in a Polish sample. Chronobiol. Int. 29 780–785. 10.3109/07420528.2012.685671
    1. Korkmaz S., Goksuluk D., Zararsiz G. (2014). MVN: an r package for assessing multivariate normality. R J. 6 151–162.
    1. Lipnevich A. A., Crede M., Hahn E., Spinath F. M., Roberts R. D., Preckel F. (2017). How distinctive are morningness and eveningness from the big five factors of personality? A meta-analytic investigation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112 491–509. 10.1037/pspp0000099
    1. Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén.
    1. Neubauer A. C. (1992). Psychometric properties of two circadian rhythm questionnaires and their relationship with personality. Pers. Individ. Differ. 13 125–132. 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90035-N
    1. Oginska H. (2011). Can you feel the rhythm? A short questionnaire to describe two dimensions of chronotype. Pers. Individ. Diff. 50 1039–1043. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.020
    1. Oginska H., Mojsa-Kaja J., Mairesse O. (2017). Chronotype description: in search of a solid subjective amplitude scale. Chronobiol. Int. 34 1388–1400. 10.1080/07420528.2017.1372469
    1. Oginska H., Oginska-Bruchal K. (2014). Chronotype and personality factors of predisposition to seasonal affective disorder. Chronobiol. Int. 31 523–531. 10.3109/07420528.2013.874355
    1. Ottoni G. L., Antoniolli E., Lara D. R. (2011). The circadian energy scale (CIRENS): two simple questions for a reliable chronotype measurement based on energy. Chronobiol. Int. 28 229–237. 10.3109/07420528.2011.553696
    1. Putilov A. A. (1993). “A questionnaire for self-assessment of individual profile and adaptability of sleepwake cycle,” in Chronobiology and Chronomedicine 1991: Basic Research and Applications eds Gutenbrunner C., Hildebrandt G., Moog R. (Frankfurt am Main: Lang; ) 492–498.
    1. Rahafar A., Randler C., Díaz-Morales J. F., Kasaeian A., Heidari Z. (2017). Cross-cultural validity of morningness-eveningness stability scale improved (MESSi) in Iran, Spain and Germany. Chronobiol. Int. 34 273–279. 10.1080/07420528.2016.1267187
    1. Randler C. (2007). Gender differences in morningness–eveningness assessed by self-report questionnaires: a meta-analysis. Pers. Individ. Diff. 43 1667–1675. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.05.004
    1. Randler C. (2008). Morningness-eveningness and satisfaction with life. Soc. Indicat. Res. 86 297–302. 10.1007/s11205-007-9139-x
    1. Randler C., Díaz-Morales J. F., Rahafar A., Vollmer C. (2016a). Morningness-eveningness and amplitude - development and validation of an improved composite scale to measure circadian preference and stability (MESSi). Chronobiol. Int. 33 832–848. 10.3109/07420528.2016.1171233
    1. Randler C., Freyth-Weber K., Rahafar A., Florez Jurado A., Kriegs J. O. (2016b). Morningness-eveningness in a large sample of German adolescents and adults. Heliyon 2:e00200. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00200
    1. Randler C., Faßl C., Kalb N. (2017a). From lark to owl: developmental changes in morningness-eveningness from new-borns to early adulthood. Sci. Rep. 7:45874. 10.1038/srep45874
    1. Randler C., Schredl M., Göritz A. S. (2017b). Chronotype, sleep behavior, and the big five personality factors. SAGE Open 7:2158244017728321 10.1177/2158244017728321
    1. Randler C., Stadler L., Vollmer C., Diaz-Morales J. F. (2012). Relationship between depressive symptoms and sleep duration/chronotype in women. J. Individ. Diff. 33 186–191. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000089
    1. Roberts R. D. (1998). The Lark-Owl (chronotype) Indicator (LOCI). Sydney: Entelligent Testing Products.
    1. Rodrigues P. F. S., Vagos P., Pandeirada J. N. S., Marinho P. I., Randler C., Silva C. F. (2018). Initial psychometric characterization for the portuguese version of the morningness-eveningness-stability-Scale improved (MESSi). Chronobiol. Int. 35 1608–1618. 10.1080/07420528.2018.1495646
    1. Roenneberg T., Kuehnle T., Pramstaller P. P., Ricken J., Havel M., Guth A., et al. (2004). A marker for the end of adolescence. Curr. Biol. 14 R1038–R1039. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039
    1. Schmidt C., Collette F., Cajochen C., Peigneux P. (2007). A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 24 755–789. 10.1080/02643290701754158
    1. Schmitt N., Ali A. A. (2015). “The practical importance of measurement invariance,” in More Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends eds Lance C. E., Vandenberg R. J. (New York, NY: Routledge; ) 327–346.
    1. Smith C. S., Reilly C., Midkiff K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J. Appl. Psychol. 74 728–738. 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.728
    1. Suh S., Yang H.-C., Kim N., Yu J. H., Choi S., Yun C.-H., et al. (2017). Chronotype differences in health behaviors and health-related quality of life: a population-based study among aged and older adults. Behav. Sleep Med. 15 361–376. 10.1080/15402002.2016.1141768
    1. Tomažič I., Randler C. (2019). Slovenian adaptation of the Morningness-Eveningness-Stability Scales improved (MESSi). Biol. Rhythm Res. (in press) 10.1080/09291016.2018.1535539.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever