Assessing the Outcomes of an Animal-Assisted Intervention in a Paediatric Day Hospital: Perceptions of Children and Parents

Adriana Ávila-Álvarez, Jerónimo Pardo-Vázquez, Iván De-Rosende-Celeiro, Rita Jácome-Feijoo, Gabriel Torres-Tobío, Adriana Ávila-Álvarez, Jerónimo Pardo-Vázquez, Iván De-Rosende-Celeiro, Rita Jácome-Feijoo, Gabriel Torres-Tobío

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of animal-assisted intervention (AAI) as a non-pharmacological strategy to improve child welfare in hospitals. However, the efficacy of implementation of programmes based on activities with dogs in a paediatric day hospital is not known. An intra-subject quasi-experimental longitudinal design was used for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of such an intervention, as well as exploring the perceptions of its outcomes by children and parents/guardians. A total of 55 children in outpatient care at a paediatric day hospital participated in an AAI session. The application of this intervention was feasible. Self-assessment by the paediatric patients revealed a statistically significant improvement in their emotional state after the session, which was large in size. Parents confirmed this improvement in their child, perceiving significant changes in their mood, which were large in size. This study suggests that AAI is an effective approach when it comes to promoting the emotional welfare of children during their stay in hospital care environments. Participating in recreational occupations with dogs could contribute in a relevant and efficient way to the development of significant and gratifying experiences and to a more positive perception of healthcare centres on the part of children.

Keywords: animal-assisted intervention; day hospital; dogs; emotional well-being; occupational therapy; outcomes; paediatric illness.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Bonn M. The effects of hospitalisation on children: A review. Curationis. 1994;17:20–24. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v17i2.1384.
    1. Fernández-Castillo A., López-Naranjo I. Transmisión de emociones, miedo y estrés infantil por hospitalización. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2006;6:631–645. (In Spanish)
    1. Coyne I. Children’s experiences of hospitalization. J. Child Health Care. 2006;10:326–336. doi: 10.1177/1367493506067884.
    1. Tiedeman M.E., Clatworthy S. Anxiety Responses of 5- to 11-Year-Old Children during and after Hospitalization. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 1990;5:334–343. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80031-0.
    1. Delvecchio E., Salcuni S., Lis A., Germani A., Di Riso D. Hospitalized Children: Anxiety, Coping Strategies, and Pretend Play. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00250.
    1. Rodriguez C.M., Clough V., Gowda A.S., Tucker M.C. Multimethod Assessment of Children’s Distress During Noninvasive Outpatient Medical Procedures: Child and Parent Attitudes and Factors. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2012;37:557–566. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss005.
    1. Bachanas P.J., Roberts M.C. Factors affecting children’s attitudes toward health care and responses to stressful medical procedures. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1995;20:261–275. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/20.3.261.
    1. Kain Z.N., Mayes L.C. Anxiety in children during the perioperative period. In: Borestein M.H., Genevro J.L., editors. Child Development and Behavioral Pediatrics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 1996. pp. 85–103.
    1. Stevens B.J., Abbott L.K., Yamada J., Harrison D., Stinson J., Taddio A., Barwick M., Latimer M., Scott S.D., Rashotee J., et al. CIHR Team in Children´s Pain. Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ. 2011;183:E403–E410. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101341.
    1. Taddio A., Chambers C.T., Halperin S.A., Ipp M., Lockett D., Rieder M.J., Shah V. Inadequate pain management during routine childhood immunizations: The nerve of it. Clin. Ther. 2009;31:S152–S167. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.022.
    1. Birnie K.A., Noel M., Chambers C.T., Uman L.S., Parker J.A. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;10:CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
    1. Kleiber C., McCarthy A.M. Evaluating instruments for a study on children’s responses to a painful procedure when parents are distraction coaches. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2006;21:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2005.06.008.
    1. Shepley M.M. The role of positive distraction in neonatal intensive care unit settings. J. Perinatol. 2006;26:S34–S37. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211584.
    1. Schneider S.M., Hood L.E. Virtual reality: A distraction intervention for chemotherapy. Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 2007;34:39–46. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.39-46.
    1. Bukola I.M., Paula D. The Effectiveness of Distraction as Procedural Pain Management Technique in Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;54:589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.006.
    1. Vagnoli L., Caprilli S., Vernucci C., Zagni S., Mugnai F., Messeri A. Can Presence of a Dog Reduce Pain and Distress in Children during Venipuncture? Pain Manag. Nurs. 2015;16:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.04.004.
    1. Silva N.B., Osório F.L. Impact of an animal-assisted therapy programme on physiological and psychosocial variables of paediatric oncology patients. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194731.
    1. Sobo E.J., Eng B., Kassity-Krich N. Canine Visitations (Pet) Therapy: Pilot Data on Decreases in Child Pain Perception. J. Holist. Nurs. 2006;24:51–57. doi: 10.1177/0898010105280112.
    1. Braun C., Stangler T., Narveson J., Pettingell S. Animal-assisted therapy as a pain relief intervention for children. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2009;15:105–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.02.008.
    1. Chur-Hansen A., McArthur M., Winefield H., Hanieh E., Hazel S. Animal-Assisted Interventions in Children’s Hospitals: A Critical Review of the Literature. Anthrozoös. 2014;27:5–18. doi: 10.2752/175303714X13837396326251.
    1. McCullough A., Ruehrdanz A., Jenkins M.A., Gilmer M.J., Olson J., Pawar A., Holley L., Sierra-Rivera S., Linder D.E., Pichette D., et al. Measuring the Effects of an Animal-Assisted Intervention for Pediatric Oncology Patients and Their Parents: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2018;35:159–177. doi: 10.1177/1043454217748586.
    1. International Association of Human-Interaction Organizations . The IAHAIO definitions for animal-assisted intervention and guidelines for wellness of animals involved, IAHAIO White Paper 2014. In: Fine A.H., editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: Foundations and Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Interventions. 4th ed. Elsevier Academic Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 2015. pp. 415–418.
    1. Moody W.J., Maps R.K., Rourke S. Attitudes of paediatric medical ward staff to a dog visitation programme. J. Clin. Nurs. 2002;11:537–544. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00618.x.
    1. Bert F., Gualano M.R., Camussi E., Pieve G., Voglino G., Siliquini R. Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2016;8:695–706. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005.
    1. Lundqvist M., Carlsson P., Sjödahl R., Theodorsson E., Levin L. Patient benefit of dog-assisted interventions in health care: A systematic review. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017;17:358. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1844-7.
    1. Branson S.M., Boss L., Padhye N.S., Trötscher T., Ward A. Effects of Animal-assisted Activities on Biobehavioral Stress Responses in Hospitalized Children: A Randomized Controlled Study. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2017;36:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.05.006.
    1. Chubak J., Hawkes R., Dudzik C., Foose-Foster J.M., Eaton L., Johnson R.H., Macpherson C.F. Pilot Study of Therapy Dog Visits for Inpatient Youth With Cancer. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2017;34:331–341. doi: 10.1177/1043454217712983.
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Ávila-Álvarez A., Alonso-Bidegain M., De-Rosende-Celeiro I., Vizcaíno-Cela M., Larrañeta-Alcalde L., Torres-Tobío G. Improving social participation of children with autism spectrum disorder: Pilot testing of an early animal-assisted intervention in Spain. Health Soc. Care Community. 2020;28:1220–1229. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12955.
    1. Kahneman D., Deaton A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:16489–16493. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107.
    1. Nimer J., Lundahl B. Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös. 2007;20:225–238. doi: 10.2752/089279307X224773.
    1. Buchanan H., Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2002;12:47–52.
    1. Buchanan H., Niven N. Further evidence for the validity of the Facial Image Scale. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2003;13:368–369. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00488.x.
    1. Venham L.L. The effect of mother’s presence on child’s response to dental treatment. J. Dent. Chil. 1979;46:219–225.
    1. Henry A.D. Pediatric Interest Profiles: Surveys of Play for Children and Adolescents. Therapy Skill Builders; San Antonio, TX, USA: 2000.
    1. Kaminski M., Pellino T., Wish J. Play and Pets: The Physical and Emotional Impact of Child- Life and Pet Therapy on Hospitalized Children. Child. Health Care. 2002;31:321–335. doi: 10.1207/S15326888CHC3104_5.
    1. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1978.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1988.
    1. Scaife J.M., Campbell I. A comparison of the outcome of day-care and inpatient treatment of paediatric surgical cases. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 1988;29:185–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1988.tb00703.x.
    1. Stargatt R., Davidson A.J., Huang G.H., Czarnecki C., Gibson M.A., Stewart S.A., Jamsen K. A cohort study of the incidence and risk factors for negative behaviour changes in children after general anesthesia. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2006;16:846–859. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01869.x.
    1. Barker S.B., Knisely J.S., Schubert C.M., Green J.D., Ameringer S. The Effect of an Animal-Assisted Intervention on Anxiety and Pain in Hospitalized Children. Anthrozoös. 2015;28:101–112. doi: 10.2752/089279315X14129350722091.
    1. Tsai C., Friedmann E., Thomas S.A. The Effect of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Stress Responses in Hospitalized Children. Anthrozoös. 2010;23:245–258. doi: 10.2752/175303710X12750451258977.
    1. Calcaterra V., Veggiotti P., Palestrini C., De Giorgis V., Raschetti R., Tumminelli M., Mencherini S., Papotti F., Klersy C., Albertini R., et al. Post-Operative Benefits of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Pediatric Surgery: A Randomised Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125813.
    1. Wu A.S., Niedra R., Pendergast L., McCrindle B.W. Acceptability and Impact of Pet Visitation on a Pediatric Cardiology Inpatient Unit. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2002;17:354–362. doi: 10.1053/jpdn.2002.127173.
    1. Wilson E.O. Biophilia. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1984.
    1. Beck A.M. The biology of the human-animal bond. Anim. Front. 2014;4:32–36. doi: 10.2527/af.2014-0019.
    1. Serpell J.A. Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Anim. Welf. 2004;13:145–151.
    1. Miller J., Connor K. Going to the dogs…for help. Nursing. 2003;30:65–67. doi: 10.1097/00152193-200030110-00030.
    1. Custance D., Mayer J. Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: An exploratory study. Anim. Cogn. 2012;15:851–859. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0510-1.
    1. Kertes D.A., Liu J., Hall N.J., Hadad N.A., Wynne C.D.L., Bhatt S.S. Effect of Pet Dogs on Children’s Perceived Stress and Cortisol Stress Response. Soc. Dev. 2017;26:382–401. doi: 10.1111/sode.12203.
    1. Nagengast S.L., Baun M.M., Megel M., Leibowitz J.M. The Effects of the Presence of a Companion Animal on Physiological Arousal and Behavioral Distress in Children During a Physical Examination. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 1997;12:323–330. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80058-9.
    1. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 1984.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever