Indocyanine green clearance test in liver transplantation: defining cut-off levels for graft viability assessment during organ retrieval and for the prediction of post-transplant graft function recovery - the Liver Indocyanine Green (LivInG) Trial Study Protocol

Alessandro Coppola, Giuseppe Bianco, Quirino Lai, Giuseppe Marrone, Miriam Caimano, Salvatore Agnes, Gabriele Spoletini, Alessandro Coppola, Giuseppe Bianco, Quirino Lai, Giuseppe Marrone, Miriam Caimano, Salvatore Agnes, Gabriele Spoletini

Abstract

Introduction: Viability assessment of the graft is essential to lower the risk of liver transplantation (LT) failure and need for emergency retransplantation, however, this still relies mainly on surgeon's experience. Post-LT graft function recovery assessment is also essential to aid physicians in the management of LT recipients and guide them through challenging decision making.This study aims to trial the use of indocyanine green clearance test (IGT) in the donor as an objective tool to assess graft viability and in the recipient to assess graft function recovery after LT.

Methods and analysis: This is an observational prospective single-centre study on consecutive liver transplant donors and recipients.

Primary objective: To determine the capability of IGT of predicting graft viability at the time of organ retrieval. Indocyanine green will be administered to the donor and the plasma disappearance rate (PDR) measured using the pulsidensitometric method. Some 162 IGT donor procedures will be required (α, 5%; β, 20%) using an IGT-PDR cut-off value of 13% to achieve a significant discrimination between viable and non-viable grafts.

Secondary objective: IGT-PDR will be measured at different time-points in the LT recipient: during the anhepatic phase, after graft reperfusion, at 24 hours, on day 3 and day 7 after LT. The slope of IGT values from the donor to the recipient will be evaluated for correlation with the development of early allograft dysfunction.

Ethics and dissemination: This research protocol was approved by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Ethics Committee (reference number: 0048466/20, study ID: 3656) and by the Italian National Transplant Center (CNT) (reference number: Prot.11/CNT2021). Liver recipients will be required to provide written informed consent. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented in congresses.

Trial registration number: NCT05228587.

Keywords: Hepatobiliary surgery; Hepatology; Transplant surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Avolio AW, Franco A, Schlegel A, et al. . Development and validation of a comprehensive model to estimate early allograft failure among patients requiring early liver Retransplant. JAMA Surg 2020;155:e204095. 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4095
    1. Lo IJ, Lefkowitch JH, Feirt N, et al. . Utility of liver allograft biopsy obtained at procurement. Liver Transpl 2008;14:639–46. 10.1002/lt.21419
    1. Frongillo F, Lirosi MC, Sganga G, et al. . Graft steatosis as a risk factor of ischemic-type biliary lesions in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014;46:2293–4. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.07.057
    1. Agopian VG, Harlander-Locke MP, Markovic D, et al. . Evaluation of early allograft function using the liver graft assessment following transplantation risk score model. JAMA Surg 2018;153:436–44. 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5040
    1. Levesque E, Martin E, Dudau D, et al. . Current use and perspective of indocyanine green clearance in liver diseases. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2016;35:49–57. 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.06.006
    1. Lau H, Man K, Fan ST. Evaluation of preoperative hepatic function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1255–9.
    1. Cherchi V, Vetrugno L, Terrosu G, et al. . Association between the donor to recipient ICG-PDR variation rate and the functional recovery of the graft after orthotopic liver transplantation: a case series. PLoS One 2021;16:e0256786. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256786
    1. Wang W, Zhao Q, Hu A, et al. . Application of indocyanine green (ICG) detection in evaluating early prognosis in patients with fatty liver disease after liver transplantation. Ann Transplant 2017;22:208–14. 10.12659/AOT.901277
    1. Tang Y, Han M, Chen M, et al. . Donor indocyanine green clearance test predicts graft quality and early graft prognosis after liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:3212–20. 10.1007/s10620-017-4765-x
    1. Levesque E, Saliba F, Benhamida S, et al. . Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green: a tool to evaluate early graft outcome after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1358–64. 10.1002/lt.21805
    1. Schneider L, Spiegel M, Latanowicz S, et al. . Noninvasive indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate predicts early complications, graft failure or death after liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2011;10:362–8. 10.1016/S1499-3872(11)60061-1
    1. Cherchi V, Vetrugno L, Zanini V, et al. . Indocyanine green dye clearance test: early graft (dys)-function and long-term mortality after liver transplant. Should we continue to use it? An observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 2021;35:505–13. 10.1007/s10877-020-00493-z
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, et al. . Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl 2010;16:943–9. 10.1002/lt.22091
    1. Bruegger L, Studer P, Schmid SW, et al. . Indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate during the anhepatic phase of orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:67–72. 10.1007/s11605-007-0352-3

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever