Development of a functional prototype of a SMART (Sensor-integrated for Monitoring And Remote Tracking) foot abduction brace for clubfoot treatment: a pre-clinical evaluation

Alaric Aroojis, Tapas Pandey, Ajay Dusa, Arun G Krishnan, Rupesh Ghyar, Bhallamudi Ravi, Alaric Aroojis, Tapas Pandey, Ajay Dusa, Arun G Krishnan, Rupesh Ghyar, Bhallamudi Ravi

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrences following clubfoot correction by the Ponseti method can be prevented by regular use of a foot abduction brace (FAB) until the child is four to five years old. However, there is a lack of an objective method to measure actual hours of brace usage. The aim was to develop a functional prototype of a SMART (Sensor-integrated for Monitoring And Remote Tracking) clubfoot brace to record accurate brace usage and transmit the data remotely to healthcare providers treating clubfoot.

Methods: A collaborative team of engineers and doctors was formed to investigate various types of sensors and wireless technologies to develop a functional prototype of a SMART brace.

Results: Infrared sensors were used to detect if the feet were placed inside the shoes and magnetic Hall effect sensors to detect that the shoes were latched on to the bar of the existing FAB. Brace usage data were captured by the sensors every 15 minutes and stored locally on a data card. A Bluetooth low energy (BLE)-based wireless transmission system was used to send the data daily from the brace to the remote cloud server via a smartphone application. Accurate brace usage data could be recorded by the sensors and visualized in real time on a web-based application in a pre-clinical setting, demonstrating feasibility in clinical practice.

Conclusion: The low-cost SMART brace prototype that we have developed can accurately measure and remotely transmit brace usage data and has the potential to transform caregivers' behaviour towards brace adherence, which could result in a tangible reduction in recurrence rates.

Keywords: Brace adherence; Clubfoot; Foot abduction brace; Ponseti method; Recurrences; Sensors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared the following relationships: Dr. Alaric Aroojis received consultancy fees from MiracleFeet as principal investigator for this project. The other authors received part-time fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses from the funds received from the SICOT grant. BETiC has collaborations with the medical device industry on other products.

© 2021. SICOT aisbl.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a SMART brace modular attachments fitted on to the bar of the MiracleFeet foot abduction brace (MFAB). b Final prototype of the SMART brace showing modular attachments and shoes attached to the bar of the MFAB
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
First iteration of sensor design showing a force-sensitive resistor (FSR) sensors in the sole of the shoe and b magnetic port for data transmission
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Second iteration of sensor design showing a touch sensors on the sole of the shoe and b data recorder and transmitter in the shoe base
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Final iteration of sensor design showing a infrared sensor in the modular attachment and b Hall sensor magnet embedded in the base of the shoe
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Block diagram showing data flow
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a The under surface of the printed circuit board (PCB) showing both the Hall effect and the infrared (IR) sensors. b The top layer of the PCB showing electronics components
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Block diagram of the electronic components for the master module
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Screenshot of data visualization page of the web application showing cumulative number of hours the child has worn the brace, day-wise

References

    1. Smythe T, Kuper H, Macleod D, Foster A, Lavy C. Birth prevalence of congenital talipesequinovarus in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(3):269–285. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12833.
    1. Owen RM, Capper B, Lavy C. Clubfoot treatment in 2015: a global perspective. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3:e000852. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000852.
    1. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):376–380. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.376.
    1. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:23–31. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198062010-00004.
    1. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1477–1489. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199510000-00002.
    1. Desai L, Oprescu F, DiMeo A, Morcuende JA. Bracing in the treatment of children with clubfoot: past, present, and future. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:15–23.
    1. Abdelgawad AA, Lehman WB, van Bosse HJ, Scher DM, Sala DA. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16(2):98–105. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32801048bb.
    1. Avilucea FR, Szalay EA, Bosch PP, Sweet KR, Schwend RM. Effect of cultural factors on outcome of Ponseti treatment of clubfeet in rural America. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(3):530–540. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00580.
    1. Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:22–27. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200401000-00005.
    1. Thacker MM, Scher DM, Sala DA, Bosse HJ, Feldman DS, Lehman WB. Use of the foot abduction orthosis following Ponseti casts: is it essential? J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;25:225–228. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000150814.56790.f9.
    1. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:487–493. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200703000-00004.
    1. Richards BS, Faulks S, Rathjen KE, Karol LA, Johnston CE, Jones SA. A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2313–2321. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01621.
    1. Zionts LE, Dietz FR. Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:486–493. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201008000-00005.
    1. Nogueira MP, Fox M, Miller K, Morcuende J. ThePonseti method of treatment for clubfoot in Brazil: barriers to bracing compliance. Iowa Orthop J. 2013;33:161–166.
    1. Havey R, Gavin T, Patwardhan A, Pawelczak S, Ibrahim K, Andersson GB, Lavender S. A reliable and accurate method for measuring orthosis wearing time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(2):211–214. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00018.
    1. Takemitsu M, Bowen JR, Rahman T, Glutting JJ, Scott CB. Compliance monitoring of brace treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(18):2070–2074. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138280.43663.7b.
    1. Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, Kelly DM, Birch JG. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(6):1343–1352. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01142.
    1. Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, Wheeler L. Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(1):9–14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00359.
    1. Morgenstein A, Davis R, Talwalkar V, Iwinski H, Jr, Walker J, Milbrandt TA. A randomized clinical trial comparing reported and measured wear rates in clubfoot bracing using a novel pressure sensor. J PediatrOrthop. 2015;35(2):185–191.
    1. Sangiorgio SN, Ho NC, Morgan RD, Ebramzadeh E, Zionts LE. The objective measurement of brace-use adherence in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1598–1605. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00170.
    1. Richards BS, Faulks S, Felton K, Karacz CM. Objective measurement of brace wear in successfully Ponseti-treated clubfeet: pattern of decreasing use in the first 2 years. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:383–387. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00163.
    1. Mobasheri MH, King D, Johnston M, Gautama S, Purkayastha S, Darzi A. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: a multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015;1:174–181. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000062.
    1. Statista. Smartphone ownership rate by country 2020. . Accessed 1 Mar 2021
    1. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of e-health interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235. doi: 10.2196/10235.
    1. Dobbs MB, Frick SL, Mosca VS, et al. Design and descriptive data of the randomized Clubfoot Foot Abduction Brace Length of Treatment Study (FAB24) J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017;26(2):101–107. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000387.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever