Conservative therapy for the treatment of patients with somatic tinnitus attributed to temporomandibular dysfunction: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Sarah Michiels, Annemarie Christien van der Wal, Evelien Nieste, Paul Van de Heyning, Marc Braem, Corine Visscher, Vedat Topsakal, Annick Gilles, Laure Jacquemin, Marianne Hesters, Willem De Hertogh, Sarah Michiels, Annemarie Christien van der Wal, Evelien Nieste, Paul Van de Heyning, Marc Braem, Corine Visscher, Vedat Topsakal, Annick Gilles, Laure Jacquemin, Marianne Hesters, Willem De Hertogh

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus is a highly prevalent symptom affecting 10-15% of the adult population. It often affects patient quality of life and frequently causes distress. When subjective tinnitus can be elicited by the somatosensory system of the cervical spine or temporomandibular area it is termed somatic tinnitus. The first aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of the best evidence conservative temporomandibular disorder (TMD) treatment on tinnitus in patients with co-existence of tinnitus and TMD or oral parafunctions compared to no treatment. The second aim is to identify a subgroup of patients with tinnitus that benefits from the conservative temporomandibular joint treatment.

Methods and design: This study is a randomised controlled trial with a delayed treatment design. Patients with a TMD (TMD pain screener ≥ 3 points) or oral parafunctions (such as clenching and bruxism), who are suffering from moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) between 25 and 90 points), will be recruited from the tertiary tinnitus clinic of the University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium. Patients will be excluded in case of clear otological or neurological causes of the tinnitus, progressive middle ear pathology, intracranial pathology, traumatic cervical spine or temporomandibular injury in the past 6 months, severe depression as diagnosed by a psychologist, tumours, previous surgery in the orofacial area, substance abuse that may affect the outcome measures, any contra-indication for physical therapy treatment directed to the orofacial area or when they received TMD treatment in the past 2 months. After screening for eligibility, baseline data among which scores on the TFI, tinnitus questionnaire (TQ), mean tinnitus loudness as measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), TMD pain screener, and a set of temporomandibular joint tests will be collected. Patients will be randomised in an early-start group and in a delayed-start group of therapy by 9 weeks. Patients will receive conservative TMD treatment with a maximum of 18 sessions within 9 weeks. At baseline (week 0), at the start of therapy (weeks 0 or 9), 9 weeks after therapy (weeks 9 or 18), and at follow-up (weeks 18 or 27) data from the TFI, TQ, VAS mean tinnitus loudness and the TMD pain screener will be collected.

Discussion: Herein, we aim to improve the quality of care for patients with tinnitus attributed to TMD or oral parafunctions. By evaluating the effect of state-of-the-art TMD treatment on tinnitus complaints, we can investigate the usefulness of TMD treatment in patients with somatic tinnitus.

Trial registration: 3 July 2017, version 1 of the protocol, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209297 .

Keywords: Occlusal splints; Physical therapy modalities; Somatic tinnitus; Somatosensory; Temporomandibular disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is obtained from the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Antwerp (reference number: B300201730825). Informed consent is obtained for all patients. The trial is currently in the recruitment phase.

Consent for publication

All authors gave the corresponding author written consent to submit the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Delayed-start design (A: early-start group; B: delayed-start group; Q: Questionnaires; Exam.: full examination)

References

    1. Baguley D, McFerran D, Hall D. Tinnitus. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1600–1607. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7.
    1. Axelsson A, Ringdahl A. Tinnitus--a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol. 1989;23(1):53–62. doi: 10.3109/03005368909077819.
    1. Teachey WS, et al. Tinnitus of myofascial origin. Int Tinnitus J. 2012;17(1):70–73.
    1. Saldanha AD, et al. Are temporomandibular disorders and tinnitus associated? Cranio. 2012;30(3):166–171. doi: 10.1179/crn.2012.026.
    1. Abel MD, Levine RA. Muscle contractions and auditory perception in tinnitus patients and nonclinical subjects. Cranio. 2004;22(3):181–191. doi: 10.1179/crn.2004.024.
    1. Michiels S, et al. Cervical spine dysfunctions in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(4):741–745. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000670.
    1. Chole RA, Parker WS. Tinnitus and vertigo in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(8):817–821. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880080039010.
    1. Upton LG, Wijeyesakere SJ. The incidence of tinnitus in people with disorders of the temporomandibular joint. Int Tinnitus J. 2004;10(2):174–176.
    1. Manfredini D, et al. Prevalence of tinnitus in patients with different temporomandibular disorders symptoms. Int Tinnitus J. 2015;19(2):47–51. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20150008.
    1. Lam DK, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC. Aural symptoms in temporomandibular disorder patients attending a craniofacial pain unit. J Orofac Pain. 2001;15(2):146–157.
    1. Buergers R, et al. Is there a link between tinnitus and temporomandibular disorders? J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.001.
    1. Zhan X, Pongstaporn T, Ryugo DK. Projections of the second cervical dorsal root ganglion to the cochlear nucleus in rats. J Comp Neurol. 2006;496(3):335–348. doi: 10.1002/cne.20917.
    1. Pfaller K, Arvidsson J. Central distribution of trigeminal and upper cervical primary afferents in the rat studied by anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin. J Comp Neurol. 1988;268(1):91–108. doi: 10.1002/cne.902680110.
    1. Kanold PO, Young ED. Proprioceptive information from the pinna provides somatosensory input to cat dorsal cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci. 2001;21(19):7848–7858. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07848.2001.
    1. Shore S, Zhou J, Koehler S. Neural mechanisms underlying somatic tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:107–123. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66010-5.
    1. Adler RH. Engel's biopsychosocial model is still relevant today. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(6):607–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.008.
    1. Durham J., Newton-John T. R. O., Zakrzewska J. M. Temporomandibular disorders. BMJ. 2015;350(mar12 9):h1154–h1154. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1154.
    1. Durham J, Wassell RW. Recent advancements in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) Rev Pain. 2011;5(1):18–25. doi: 10.1177/204946371100500104.
    1. Greene CS. Managing patients with temporomandibular disorders: a new “standard of care”. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.015.
    1. Dworkin SF, et al. A randomized clinical trial using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care TMD treatment program. J Orofac Pain. 2002;16(1):48–63.
    1. Feine JS, Lund JP. An assessment of the efficacy of physical therapy and physical modalities for the control of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 1997;71(1):5–23. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03287-3.
    1. de Souza RF, et al. Interventions for the management of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD007261.
    1. Joos K, et al. From sensation to percept: the neural signature of auditory event-related potentials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.009.
    1. Sanchez TG, Rocha CB. Diagnosis and management of somatosensory tinnitus: review article. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66(6):1089–1094. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600028.
    1. Gonzalez YM, et al. Development of a brief and effective temporomandibular disorder pain screening questionnaire: reliability and validity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(10):1183–1191. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0088.
    1. Schiffman E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6–27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
    1. Michiels S, et al. Physical therapy treatment in patients suffering from cervicogenic somatic tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:297. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-297.
    1. Saghaei M. An overview of randomization and minimization programs for randomized clinical trials. J Med Signals Sens. 2011;1(1):55–61.
    1. Hallam RS, Jakes SC, Hinchcliffe R. Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. Br J Clin Psychol. 1988;27(Pt 3):213–222. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00778.x.
    1. Meeus O, Blaivie C, Van de Heyning P. Validation of the Dutch and the French version of the tinnitus questionnaire. B-ENT. 2007;3(Suppl 7):11–17.
    1. Zeman F, et al. Tinnitus assessment by means of standardized self-report questionnaires: psychometric properties of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ), the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), and their short versions in an international and multi-lingual sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:128. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-128.
    1. Bernhardt O, Schiffman EL, Look JO. Reliability and validity of a new fingertip-shaped pressure algometer for assessing pressure pain thresholds in the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles. J Orofac Pain. 2007;21(1):29–38.
    1. Meikle MB, et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012;33(2):153–176. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Bjelland I, et al. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.
    1. Meeus OM, et al. Correlation between hyperacusis measurements in daily ENT practice. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(1):7–13. doi: 10.3109/14992020903160868.
    1. Khalfa S, et al. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002;64(6):436–442. doi: 10.1159/000067570.
    1. Gilles A, et al. Decreased speech-in-noise understanding in young adults with tinnitus. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:288. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00288.
    1. van Wieringen A, Wouters J. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(6):348–355. doi: 10.1080/14992020801895144.
    1. Craane B, et al. One-year evaluation of the effect of physical therapy for masticatory muscle pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(5):737–747. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00038.x.
    1. Baron RM, et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
    1. Michiels S, et al. The effect of physical therapy treatment in patients with subjective tinnitus: a systematic review. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:545. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00545.
    1. Bosel C, et al. Chronic tinnitus and craniomandibular disorders. Effectiveness of functional therapy on perceived tinnitus distress. HNO. 2008;56(7):707–713. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1602-0.
    1. Tuncer AB, et al. Effectiveness of manual therapy and home physical therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013;17(3):302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.10.006.
    1. Pankhurst CL. Controversies in the aetiology of temporomandibular disorders. Part 1. Temporomandibular disorders: all in the mind? Prim Dent Care. 1997;4(1):25–30.
    1. McKinney MW, et al. Chronic TM disorder and non-TM disorder pain: a comparison of behavioral and psychological characteristics. Cranio. 1990;8(1):40–46. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1990.11678298.
    1. Turp JC, et al. Is there a superiority of multimodal as opposed to simple therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):138–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01480.x.
    1. Won JY, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with neck and jaw muscle modulation of tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(4):261–273. doi: 10.1159/000351685.
    1. Fackrell K, et al. Psychometric properties of the tinnitus functional index (TFI): assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016;335:220–235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009.
    1. Michiels S, et al. Prognostic indicators for decrease in tinnitus severity after cervical physical therapy in patients with cervicogenic somatic tinnitus. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;29:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.02.008.
    1. Rollman A, et al. Improvement in patients with a TMD-pain report. A 6-month follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(1):5–14. doi: 10.1111/joor.12009.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever