Changes in treatment adherence and glycemic control during the transition to adolescence in type 1 diabetes
Joseph R Rausch, Korey K Hood, Alan Delamater, Jennifer Shroff Pendley, Jennifer M Rohan, Grafton Reeves, Lawrence Dolan, Dennis Drotar, Joseph R Rausch, Korey K Hood, Alan Delamater, Jennifer Shroff Pendley, Jennifer M Rohan, Grafton Reeves, Lawrence Dolan, Dennis Drotar
Abstract
Objective: To test models of unidirectional and bidirectional change between treatment adherence and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes.
Research design and methods: We conducted a 2-year longitudinal, multisite study of 225 youth with type 1 diabetes recruited at the cusp of adolescence (aged 9-11 years) to describe the mutual influences of glycemic control as measured by HbA(1c) and treatment adherence as measured by blood glucose monitoring frequency (BGMF) during the transition to adolescence.
Results: HbA(1c) increased from 8.2 to 8.6% (P < 0.001) and BGMF decreased from 4.9 to 4.5 checks per day (P < 0.02) during the 2-year period. Changes in the BGMF slope predicted changes in HbA(1c). A change (increase) in HbA(1c) was associated with a change (decrease) in BGMF of 1.26 (P < 0.001) after controlling for covariates.
Conclusions: The magnitude of the effect of declining treatment adherence (BGMF) on glycemic control in young adolescents may be even greater than declines observed among older adolescents. BGMF offers a powerful tool for targeted management of glycemic control for type 1 diabetes during the critical transition to adolescence.
Figures
References
- Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr 1994;125:177–188
- Nathan DM, Zinman B, Cleary PA, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Research Group Modern-day clinical course of type 1 diabetes mellitus after 30 years’ duration: the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications and Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications experience (1983-2005). Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1307–1316
- Kovacs M, Goldston D, Obrosky DS, Iyengar S. Prevalence and predictors of pervasive noncompliance with medical treatment among youths with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992;31:1112–1119
- Hood KK, Peterson CM, Rohan JM, Drotar D. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analyses. Pediatrics 2009;124:e1171–e1179
- Jacobson AM, Hauser ST, Lavori P, et al. Family environment and glycemic control: a four-year prospective study of children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Psychosom Med 1994;56:401–409
- Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, Greene SA, MacDonald TM, Newton RW. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Lancet 1997;350:1505–1510
- Amiel SA, Sherwin RS, Simonson DC, Lauritano AA, Tamborlane WV. Impaired insulin action in puberty. A contributing factor to poor glycemic control in adolescents with diabetes. N Engl J Med 1986;315:215–219
- Moran A, Jacobs DR, Jr, Steinberger J, et al. Association between the insulin resistance of puberty and the insulin-like growth factor-I/growth hormone axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4817–4820
- Helgeson VS, Honcharuk E, Becker D, Escobar O, Siminerio L. A focus on blood glucose monitoring: relation to glycemic control and determinants of frequency. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:25–30
- Berg CA, Wiebe DJ, Beveridge RM, et al. Mother child appraised involvement in coping with diabetes stressors and emotional adjustment. J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32:995–1005
- Palmer DL, Berg CA, Wiebe DJ, et al. The role of autonomy and pubertal status in understanding age differences in maternal involvement in diabetes responsibility across adolescence. J Pediatr Psychol 2004;29:35–46
- Palmer DL, Osborn P, King PS, et al. The structure of parental involvement and relations to disease management for youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:596–605
- McNally K, Rohan J, Pendley JS, Delamater A, Drotar D. Executive functioning, treatment adherence, and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1159–1162
- Rohan JM, Delamater A, Pendley JS, Dolan L, Reeves G, Drotar D. Identification of self-management patterns in pediatric type 1 diabetes using cluster analysis. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:611–618
- Hilliard ME, Rohan JM, Carle AC, Pendley JS, Delamater A, Drotar D. Fathers’ involvement in preadolescents’ diabetes adherence and glycemic control. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:911–922
- Hattersley A, Bruining J, Shield J, Njolstad P, Donaghue K, International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2006-2007. The diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children. Pediatr Diabetes 2006;7:352–360
- Guilfoyle SM, Crimmins NA, Hood KK. Blood glucose monitoring and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: meter downloads versus self-report. Pediatr Diabetes 2011;12:560–566
- Driscoll KA, Johnson SB, Tang Y, Yang F, Deeb LC, Silverstein JH. Does blood glucose monitoring increase prior to clinic visits in children with type 1 diabetes? Diabetes Care 2011;34:2170–2173
- Johnson SB. Health behavior and health status: concepts, methods, and applications. J Pediatr Psychol 1994;19:129–141
- Helgeson VS, Siminerio L, Escobar O, Becker D. Predictors of metabolic control among adolescents with diabetes: a 4-year longitudinal study. J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:254–270
Source: PubMed