Restoration of a Nonvital Tooth with Fiber Reinforce Composite (Wallpapering Technique)

Sara Valizadeh, Ladan Ranjbar Omrani, Simone Deliperi, Farzaneh Sadeghi Mahounak, Sara Valizadeh, Ladan Ranjbar Omrani, Simone Deliperi, Farzaneh Sadeghi Mahounak

Abstract

Introduction: Reconstruction of endodontically treated tooth (ETT) is one of the greatest challenges in dentistry. Clinical success of fiber reinforcement composite (FRC) restorations in ETT depends on many factors like remaining tooth structure, knowing advantages of adhesive dentistry besides its drawbacks, and the correct use of fibers in combination with resin composite. Case Report. This article presents a case in which fibers have been used in composite buildup in order to increase the toughness and strength of the ETT direct restoration. In addition, this technique does not require root canal enlargement to eliminate the risk of root perforation. Also, this one visit treatment can be helpful for patients that could not pay the cost of indirect restoration and/or have no time.

Conclusion: It seems in selected patients with special considerations, FRC composite restoration is valid alternatives for indirect restoration.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2020 Sara Valizadeh et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative view of tooth #16 and #26 with temporary restoration after root canal therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preapical radiographic of #16 and #26 teeth after root canal therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Occlusal view of #16 and #26 after removing temporary restoration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Peripheral enamel skeleton was built up in the distal part (Red Arrow) using wedge-shaped increments and placing appropriate length fiber in close contact with a palatal cusp (Blue Arrow).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Composite buildup of #16 and #26 teeth.

References

    1. Deliperi S. Direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration in an endodontically-treated molar: a three-year case report. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33(2):209–214. doi: 10.2341/07-99.
    1. Deliperi S., David N., Bardwell D. N., Coiana C. Reconstruction of devital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resins: a case report. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7(2):165–171.
    1. Ernst C. P., Meyer G. R., Müller J., Stender E., Ahlers M. O., Willershausern B. Depth of cure of LED vs QTH light-curing devices at a distance of 7 mm. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004;6(2):141–150.
    1. Belli S., Erdemir A., Ozcopur M., Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. International Endodontic Journal. 2005;38(2):73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.x.
    1. Soares C. J., Rodrigues M. d. P., Faria-e-Silva A. L., et al. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? Brazilian Oral Research. 2018;32, article e76(Supplement 1) doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0076.
    1. Rocca G. T., Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth: from direct composite to endocrowns. The European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2013;8(2):156–179.
    1. Deliperi S., Bardwell D. N. Reconstruction of nonvital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resin: a pilot clinical study. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2009;11(1):71–78.
    1. Deliperi S., Alleman D., Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: fiber design according to the “wallpapering” technique. Operative Dentistry. 2017;42(3):233–243. doi: 10.2341/15-289-T.
    1. Deliperi S., Bardwell D. N., Alleman D. Clinical evaluation of stress-reducing direct composite restorations in structurally compromised molars: a 2-year report. Operative Dentistry. 2012;37(2):109–116. doi: 10.2341/10-299-C.
    1. Skupien J. A. Success and Failure from a Restorative Perspective. [S.l. : s.n.]; 2016. Endodontically Treated Teeth. (Doctoral Dissertation)
    1. Smales R. J., Hawthorne W. S. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. International Dental Journal. 1996;46(3):126–130.
    1. Deliperi S. Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2012;37(4):425–431. doi: 10.2341/11-082-T.
    1. Pahlevan A., Tabatabaei M. H., Arami S., Valizadeh S. Effect of LED and argon laser on degree of conversion and temperature rise of hybrid and low shrinkage composite resins. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2016;10(1):538–545. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010538.
    1. Deliperi S. Clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and composite resin restorations: five-year results. The European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2008;3(2):148–159.
    1. Garoushi S., Gargoum A., Vallittu P. K., Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2018;9(3, article e12330) doi: 10.1111/jicd.12330.
    1. Abouelleil H., Pradelle N., Villat C., Attik N., Colon P., Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2015;40(4):262–270. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262.
    1. Belli S., Dönmez N., Eskitascioğlu G. The effect of c-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8(4):247–253.
    1. de Souza Ferreira R., Carpena Lopes G., Narcisco Baratieri L. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures. Quintessence International. 2004;35(5):359–366.
    1. Deliperi S., Bardwell D. N. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2002;133(10):1387–1398. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055.
    1. Kuijs R. H., Fennis W. M. M., Kreulen C. M., Roeters F. J. M., Verdonschot N., Creugers N. H. J. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.010.
    1. Campos R. E., Soares P. V., Versluis A., de O Júnior O. B., Ambrosano G. M. B., Nunes I. F. Crown fracture: Failure load, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015;114(3):447–455. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.023.
    1. Deliperi S., Bardwell D. N. Direct cuspal-coverage posterior resin composite restorations: a case report. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31(1):143–150. doi: 10.2341/04-177.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever