COVID-19 psychological impact in 3109 healthcare workers in Spain: The PSIMCOV group

Carolina S Romero, Carlos Delgado, Juan Catalá, Carolina Ferrer, Carlos Errando, Adina Iftimi, Ana Benito, Jose de Andrés, Maria Otero, PSIMCOV group*, Carolina S Romero, Carlos Delgado, Juan Catalá, Carolina Ferrer, Carlos Errando, Adina Iftimi, Ana Benito, Jose de Andrés, Maria Otero, PSIMCOV group*

Abstract

Background: The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has a great impact worldwide. Healthcare workers play an essential role and are one of the most exposed groups. Information about the psychosocial impact on healthcare workers is limited.

Methods: 3109 healthcare workers completed a national, internet-based, cross-sectional 45-item survey between 9 and 19 April 2020. The objective is to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spanish healthcare workers. A Psychological Stress and Adaptation at work Score (PSAS) was defined combining four modified versions of validated psychological assessment tests (A) Healthcare Stressful Test, (B) Coping Strategies Inventory, (C) Font-Roja Questionnaire and (D) Trait Meta-Mood Scale.

Results: The highest psychosocial impact was perceived in Respiratory Medicine, the mean (S.D.) PSAS was 48.3 (13.6) and Geriatrics 47.6 (16.4). Higher distress levels were found in the geographical areas with the highest incidence of COVID-19 (>245.5 cases per 100 000 people), PSAS 46.8 (15.2); p < 0.001. The least stress respondents were asymptomatic workers PSAS, 41.3 (15.4); p < 0.001, as well as those above 60 years old, PSAS, 37.6 (16); p < 0.001. Workers who needed psychological therapy and did not receive it, were more stressed PSAS 52.5 (13.6) than those who did not need it PSAS 39.7 (13.9); p < 0.001.

Conclusions: The psychological impact in healthcare workers in Spain during COVID-19 emergency has been studied. The stress perceived is parallel to the number of cases per 100 000 people. Psychotherapy could have a major role to mitigate the experimented stress level.

Keywords: Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2; healthcare workers; mental health; pandemic; psychological.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Linear regression between the variables Age and PSAS.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
PSAS career mean by work environment.

References

    1. Aranaz, J., Mira, J., & Font-Roja Questionnaire. (1988). A measurement tool for satisfaction in hospital environment (in Spanish). Todo Hospitales, 52, 63–66.
    1. Cano, F. J., Rodríguez, L., & García, J. (2007). Spanish adaptation of coping strategies inventory. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 35(1), 29–39.
    1. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.
    1. Casas, J., Repullo, J. R., & Lorenzo, S. (2002). Stress at work in healthcare environment and adaptative coping strategies (in Spanish). Revista de Calidad Asistencial, 17(4), 237–246.
    1. Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Retrieved from .
    1. Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Extremera, N. (2006). Emotional intelligence investigation in Spain (in Spanish). Ansiedad y Estrés, 12(2–3), 139–153.
    1. Haynes, S., & Lench, H. (2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 456–456.
    1. Johnston, C., & Murray, C. (2003). Incremental validity in the psychological assessment of children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 5(4), 496–507.
    1. Kang, L., Ma, S., Chen, M., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Li, R., & Liu, Z. (2020). Impact on mental health and perception of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, S0889–1591(20), 30348–2. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.028.
    1. Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C.S. (2020). Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine doi:10.1056/NEJMp2003149.
    1. Portero de la Cruz, S., Cebrino, J., Herruzo, J., & Vaquero-Abellán, M. (2020). A multicenter study into burnout, perceived stress, job satisfaction, coping strategies, and general health among emergency department nursing staff. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(4), E1007.
    1. Salovey, P., Mayer, J., Goldman, S., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale In Pennebaker J. (Ed.), APA Science volume series (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    1. Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Kigal, J. K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cognitive Therapy Research, 13(4), 343–361.
    1. Xiao, C. (2020). A novel approach of consultation on 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)-related psychological and mental problems: Structured letter therapy. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(2), 175–176.
    1. Xiao, H., Zhang, Y., Kong, D., Li, S., & Yang, N. (2020). The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Medical Science Monitor, 26, e923549.
    1. Yang, L., Yin, J., Duolao, W., Rahman, A., & Xiaomei, L. (2020). Urgent need to develop evidence-based self-help interventions for healthcare workers in COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1–3.
    1. Yuan, S., Liao, Z., Huang, H., Jiang, B., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Comparison of the indicators of psychological stress in the population of Hubei province and non-endemic provinces in China during two weeks during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in February 2020. Medical Science Monitor, 26, e923767.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever