Integrating vocational rehabilitation and mental healthcare to improve the return-to-work process for people on sick leave with depression or anxiety: results from a three-arm, parallel randomised trial

Andreas Hoff, Rie Mandrup Poulsen, Jonas Fisker, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nicole Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft, Anders Bo Bojesen, Lene Falgaard Eplov, Andreas Hoff, Rie Mandrup Poulsen, Jonas Fisker, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nicole Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft, Anders Bo Bojesen, Lene Falgaard Eplov

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate an integrated mental healthcare and vocational rehabilitation intervention to improve and hasten the process of return-to-work of people on sick leave with anxiety and depression.

Methods: In this three-arm, randomised trial, participants were assigned to (1) integrated intervention (INT), (2) improved mental healthcare (MHC) or (3) service as usual (SAU). The primary outcome was time to return-to-work measured at 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were time to return-to-work measured at 6-month follow-up; levels of anxiety, depression, stress symptoms, and social and occupational functioning at 6 months; and return-to-work measured as proportion in work at 12 months.

Results: 631 individuals were randomised. INT yielded a higher proportion in work compared with both MHC (56.2% vs 43.7%, p=0.012) and SAU (56.2% vs 45%, p=0.029) at 12-month follow-up. We found no differences in return-to-work in terms of sick leave duration at either 6-month or 12-month follow-up, with the latter being the primary outcome. No differences in anxiety, depression or functioning between INT, MHC and SAU were identified, but INT and MHC showed lower scores on Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale compared with SAU at 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Although INT did not hasten the process of return-to-work, it yielded better outcome with regard to proportion in work compared with MHC and SAU. The findings suggest that INT compared with SAU is associated with a few, minor health benefits. Overall, INT yielded slightly better vocational and health outcomes, but the clinical significance of the health advantage is questionable.

Trial registration number: NCT02872051.

Keywords: occupational health; psychiatry.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow. IBBIS, Integrated Health Care and Vocational Rehabilitation for Sick-Leave Benefit Recipients; INT, integrated intervention; MHC, mental healthcare; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SAU, service as usual.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vocational outcome graphs. Left: Kaplan-Meier curve of time to stable return-to-work. Right: proportion in stable work per week. INT, integrated intervention; MHC, mental healthcare; SAU, service as usual.

References

    1. OECD HR. Sick on the job? myths and realities about mental health and work. Tijdschr voor bedrijfs- en Verzek 2012. 10.1007/s12498-012-0114-3
    1. Modini M, Joyce S, Mykletun A, et al. . The mental health benefits of employment: results of a systematic meta-review. Australas Psychiatry 2016;24:331–6. 10.1177/1039856215618523
    1. Hees HL, Koeter MWJ, Schene AH. Predictors of long-term return to work and symptom remission in sick-listed patients with major depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73:e1048–55. 10.4088/JCP.12m07699
    1. Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, et al. . Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD006389. 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2
    1. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, et al. . Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;10:CD006237. 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub4
    1. Wang PS, Simon GE, Avorn J, et al. . Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;298:1401. 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401
    1. Mikkelsen MB, Rosholm M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at enhancing return to work for sick-listed workers with common mental disorders, stress-related disorders, somatoform disorders and personality disorders. Occup Environ Med 2018;75:675–86. 10.1136/oemed-2018-105073
    1. Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38:93–104. 10.5271/sjweh.3257
    1. OECD . Assessment and recommendations. In: Mental health and work: Denmark. OECD Publishing, 2013: 13–19.
    1. MacEachen E, Varatharajan S, Du B, et al. . The uneven foci of work disability research across Cause-based and comprehensive social security systems. Int J Health Serv 2019;49:142–64. 10.1177/0020731418809857
    1. Olejaz M, Juul Nielsen A, Rudkjøbing A, et al. . Denmark health system review. Health Syst Transit 2012;14:1–192.
    1. Poulsen R, Hoff A, Fisker J, et al. . Integrated mental health care and vocational rehabilitation to improve return to work rates for people on sick leave because of depression and anxiety (the Danish IBBIS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:578. 10.1186/s13063-017-2272-1
    1. Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH. The Mini-International neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. in. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998:22–33.
    1. Bonfils IS, Hansen H, Dalum HS, et al. . Implementation of the individual placement and support approach – facilitators and barriers. Scand J Disabil Res 2017;19:318–33. 10.1080/15017419.2016.1222306
    1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . The NICE guideline on the treatment and depression the treatment and management of depression, 2009. Available:
    1. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. . An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893–7. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8:77–100. 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385–96. 10.2307/2136404
    1. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. . The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:461–4. 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461
    1. Terluin B, van Marwijk HWJ, Adèr HJ, et al. . The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry 2006;6:34. 10.1186/1471-244X-6-34
    1. Saboonchi F, Perski A, Grossi G. Validation of Karolinska exhaustion scale: psychometric properties of a measure of exhaustion syndrome. Scand J Caring Sci 2013;27:1010–7. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01089.x
    1. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, et al. . The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002;17:1–16. 10.1080/08870440290001494
    1. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, et al. . A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004;13:873–84. 10.1002/hec.866
    1. Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:60. 10.1186/1477-7525-1-60
    1. Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, et al. . Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress 2010;24:359–75. 10.1080/02678373.2010.532644
    1. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Windsor, England: Causal and control beliefs, 1995: 35–7.
    1. Koopman C, Pelletier KR, Murray JF, et al. . Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:14–20. 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004
    1. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982;5:233–7. 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x
    1. Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Adèr HJ, et al. . Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands depression initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occup Environ Med 2013;70:223–30. 10.1136/oemed-2012-100793
    1. Reme SE, Grasdal AL, Løvvik C, et al. . Work-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy and individual job support to increase work participation in common mental disorders: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Occup Environ Med 2015;72:745–52. 10.1136/oemed-2014-102700
    1. Lammerts L, Schaafsma FG, Bonefaas-Groenewoud K, et al. . Effectiveness of a return-to-work program for workers without an employment contract, sick-listed due to common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 2016;42:469–80. 10.5271/sjweh.3588
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, et al. . Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:317–25. 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
    1. Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. Prevalence of major depression and stress indicators in the Danish general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;109:96–103. 10.1046/j.0001-690X.2003.00231.x
    1. Poulsen RM, Pii KH, Bültmann U, et al. . Developing normative integration among professionals in an intersectoral collaboration: a multi-method investigation of an integrated intervention for people on sick leave due to common mental disorders. Int J Integr Care 2019;19:4. 10.5334/ijic.4694

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever