The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Abdominal Hysterectomy Post-operative Analgesia

Christina Dai, Kai Zhang, Jeffrey Huang, Christina Dai, Kai Zhang, Jeffrey Huang

Abstract

Introduction/background Abdominal hysterectomy is an open surgical procedure associated with considerable post-operative pain. Narcotics are often required during patient recovery but can result in adverse side effects. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) is a regional anesthetic technique that is found to be an effective post-operative analgesia for many types of abdominal surgeries, including abdominal hysterectomies. However recent literature shows contradicting results regarding TAP block's analgesic effect on recovery from abdominal hysterectomies. This study investigated the efficacy of TAP block to reduce narcotic consumption and improve pain scores in abdominal hysterectomy patients. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed. The inclusion criteria was patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy at Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women & Babies (WPH) between January 12, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Exclusion criteria were patients who received a second surgery within the same hospitalization, experienced an in-hospital mortality event, received hysterectomy for known malignancy, stayed in the hospital less than 24 hours, and whose charts contained missing data points. Data collected were: age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay, total narcotic consumption (intra-operation, in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), first 24 hours after admittance, during entire hospital stay, total patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) quantity, and total oral narcotics quantity. All narcotics were converted into parental morphine units for analysis. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) scores at two, four, eight, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after leaving the PACU were collected. Two-tailed paired T-test was performed to compare the narcotic consumption and pain scores between the TAP block group and the non-TAP block group. Results WPH used ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies. 63 patient charts were evaluated with 32 in the TAP block group and 31 in the non-TAP block group. Narcotic consumption was significantly different in the PACU with TAP block group consuming less narcotics than non-TAP block group (5.05 vs 8.65 IV morphine equivalents, p=0.012). TAP block group's mean narcotic consumption was not significantly lower than Non-TAP block group's mean consumption during intra-operation, first 24 hours after admittance, and total hospital stay (p=0.419, p=0.533, p=0.754 respectively). Mean NPRS scores at all hours (2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) displayed no statistical difference between the two groups. Total patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and total overall oral narcotic usage showed no statistically significant differences between TAP block group and Non-TAP block group (p=0.252, 0.669 respectively). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that TAP block did reduce narcotic requirement in the PACU but did not exhibit superior analgesic efficacy after discharge from the PACU, nor reduce the total length of hospital stay.

Keywords: abdominal hysterectomy; anesthesia; nerve block; tap block; transversus abdominis plane block.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Narcotic Consumption During Hospital Stay
Figure 1. Narcotic Consumption During Hospital Stay
PACU: post-anesthesia care unit, PCA: patient-controlled analgesia.
Figure 2. NPRS Scores Over 24-Hour Time…
Figure 2. NPRS Scores Over 24-Hour Time Period
TAP Block: transverse abdominis plane block, NPRS: numeric pain rating scale.

References

    1. The analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Ng A, Swami A, Smith G, Davidson AC, Emembolu J. . Anesth Analg. 2002;95:158–162.
    1. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:721–735.
    1. The effect of duration of dose delivery with patient-controlled analgesia on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after hysterectomy. Woodhouse A, Mather LE. . Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;45:57–62.
    1. Dose requirements, efficacy and side effects of morphine and pethidine delivered by patient-controlled analgesia after gynaecological surgery. Stanley G, Appadu B, Mead M, Rowbotham DJ. . Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:484–486.
    1. Abdominal field block a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Rafi AN. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1024–1026.
    1. The clinical anatomy of the triangle of Petit. Jester A, Polepalli S, Kinsela C, et al. Hernia. 2007;11:441–444.
    1. Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block potentiates post-operative pain relief among abdominal hysterectomy patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Almarakbi WA, Kaki AM. . Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8:161–166.
    1. Transversus abdominis plane block to ameliorate postoperative pain outcomes after laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro-Alves LJ, Nader A, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:454–463.
    1. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:529–535.
    1. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:2056–2060.
    1. Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rojskjaer JO, Gade E, Kiel LB, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:274–278.
    1. Metropolitan Region Palliative Care Consortium. Australia: Eastern: Victoria; [Mar;2016 ]. 2013. Opioid conversion ratios - guide to practice 2013; p. 2013.
    1. Analgesic efficacy of laparoscopic-guided transverse abdominis plane block using liposomal bupivacaine in bariatric surgery. Bhakta A, Glotzer O, Ata A, Tafen M, Stain SC, Singh PT. Am J Surg. 2018;215:643–646.
    1. Continuous subcostal oblique transversus abdominis plane block provides more effective analgesia than single-shot block after gynaecological laparotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Maeda A, Shibata SC, Kamibayashi T, Fujino Y. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:514–515.
    1. Analgesic efficacy of bilateral continuous transversus abdominis plane blocks using an oblique subcostal approach in patients undergoing laparotomy for gynaecological cancer: a prospective, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study. Yoshida T, Furutani K, Watanabe Y, Ohashi N, Baba H. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:812–820.
    1. Transversus abdominis plane block for post hysterectomy pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bacal V, Rana U, McIsaac DI, Chen I. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018
    1. Transversus abdominis plane block does not provide additional benefit to multimodal analgesia in gynecological cancer surgery. Griffiths JD, Middle JV, Barron FA, Grant SJ, Popham PA, Royse CF. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:797–801.
    1. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Atim A, Bilgin F, Kilickaya O, et al. . Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:630–634.
    1. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Clin Anat. 2008;21:325–333.
    1. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominal plane block with multimodal analgesia for pain management after total abdominal hysterectomy. Gasanova I, Grant E, Way M, Rosero EB, Joshi GP. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:105–111.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever