Usefulness and acceptability of a standardised orientation and mobility training for partially-sighted older adults using an identification cane

Judith Ballemans, G A Rixt Zijlstra, Ger H M B van Rens, Jan S A G Schouten, Gertrudis I J M Kempen, Judith Ballemans, G A Rixt Zijlstra, Ger H M B van Rens, Jan S A G Schouten, Gertrudis I J M Kempen

Abstract

Background: Orientation and mobility (O&M) training in using an identification (ID) cane is provided to partially-sighted older adults to facilitate independent functioning and participation in the community. Recently, a protocolised standardised O&M-training in the use of the ID cane was developed in The Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to assess the usefulness and acceptability of both the standardised training and the regular training for participants and O&M-trainers in a randomised controlled trial (NCT00946062).

Methods: The standardised O&M-training consists of two structured face-to-face sessions and one telephone follow-up, in which, in addition to the regular training, self-management and behavioural change techniques are applied. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect data on the training's usefulness, e.g. the population reached, self-reported benefits or achievements, and acceptability, e.g. the performance of the intervention according to protocol and participants' exposure to and engagement in the training.

Results: Data was collected from 29 O&M-trainers and 68 participants. Regarding the self-reported benefits, outcomes were comparable for the standardised training and the regular training according the trainers and participants e.g., about 85% of the participants in both groups experienced benefits of the cane and about 70% gained confidence in their capabilities. Participants were actively involved in the standardised training. Nearly 40% of the participants in the standardised training group was not exposed to the training according to protocol regarding the number of sessions scheduled and several intervention elements, such as action planning and contracting.

Conclusions: The standardised and regular O&M-training showed to be useful and mostly acceptable for the partially-sighted older adults and trainers. Yet, a concern is the deviation from the protocol of the standardised O&M-training by the O&M-trainers regarding distinguishing elements such as action planning. Overall, participants appreciated both trainings and reported benefit.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of progress of participants and the data collection in the process evaluation.

References

    1. Elliott DB, Trukolo-Ilic M, Strong JG, Pace R, Plotkin A, Bevers P. Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(12):2566–2575.
    1. Turano KA, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West S. Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(5):298–307. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000134903.13651.8e.
    1. Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, Smith AR, Lau PW, Dolnak D, Rapaport MH, Kaplan RM, Brown SI. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1893–1900. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00754-0. discussion 1900–1891.
    1. de Boer MR, Moll AC, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):257–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x.
    1. Owsley C, McGwin G. Association between visual attention and mobility in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1901–1906. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52516.x.
    1. Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Hegel MT, Leiby BE, Tasman WS. Preventing depression in agerelated macular degeneration. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(8):886–892. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.886.
    1. Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Sonn U. Use of assistive devices in daily activities among 85-year-olds living at home focusing especially on the visually impaired. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(24):1423–1430. doi: 10.1080/09638280400000906.
    1. Virgili G, Rubin G. Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003925.
    1. Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, Rees G, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(4):1476–1482. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0610.
    1. Verstraten P, Oudshoorn J, van Grinsven R. Mobiliteitsvragen van blinde en slechtziende ouderen, Dossierstudie naar hulpvragen en interventies. Sensis, Grave, Netherlands; 2006.
    1. Ballemans J, Kempen GIJM, Zijlstra GA. Orientation and mobility training for partiallysighted older adults using an identification cane: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(10):880–891. doi: 10.1177/0269215511404931.
    1. Zijlstra GA, van Rens GH, Scherder EJ, Brouwer DM, van der Velde J, Verstraten PF, Kempen GI. Effects and feasibility of a standardised orientation and mobility training in using an identification cane for older adults with low vision: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:153. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-153.
    1. Soong GP, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Does mobility performance of visually impaired adults improve immediately after orientation and mobility training? Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(9):657–666. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200109000-00011.
    1. Ballemans J, Zijlstra GA, Kempen GIJM. Orientation and mobility training for partiallysighted older adults using an identification cane. a new standardized intervention approach; 2011.
    1. Zijlstra GAR, Rens GHMBv, Scherder EJA, Kempen GIJM. Development of a standardized protocol for orientation and mobility training in visually impaired older people. National Harbor, MD; 2008. The Gerontological Society of America.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):134–147. doi: 10.1177/1524839904273387.
    1. Swain DG, Nightingale PG. Evaluation of a shortened version of the Abbreviated Mental Test in a series of elderly patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11(3):243–248. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100308.
    1. Swain DG, O'Brien AG, Nightingale PG. Cognitive assessment in elderly patients admitted to hospital: the relationship between the shortened version of the Abbreviated Mental Test and the Abbreviated Mental Test and Mini-Mental State Examination. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(6):608–610. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr368oa.
    1. Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, Harper R, Tudor-Edwards R, Woodhouse M, Linck P, Suttie A, Jackson J, Lindsay J. et al.How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(1):34–65. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.06.006.
    1. Engel RJ, Welsh RL, Lewis LJ. Improving the well-being of vision-impaired older adults through oritentation and mobility training and rehabilitation: an evaluation. Review. 2000;32(2):67–76.
    1. Eklund K, Sonn U, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Long-term evaluation of a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. A randomized study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(7):401–409. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001662950.
    1. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–187. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0.
    1. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet. 2004;364(9444):1523–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17277-2.
    1. Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1641–1649. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1641.
    1. Rees G, Keeffe JE, Hassell J, Larizza M, Lamoureux E. A self-management program for low vision: program overview and pilot evaluation. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(10):808–815. doi: 10.3109/09638280903304193.
    1. Smeulders ES, van Haastregt JC, Janssen-Boyne JJ, Stoffers HE, van Eijk JT, Kempen GI. Feasibility of a group-based self-management program among congestive heart failure patients. Heart Lung. 2009;38(6):499–512. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.01.007.
    1. Rees G, Saw CL, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Self-management programs for adults with low vision: needs and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):39–46.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever