Concurrent chemoradiation and brachytherapy alone or in combination with nelfinavir in locally advanced cervical cancer (NELCER): study protocol for a phase III trial

Supriya Chopra, Jayant Sastri Goda, Prachi Mittal, Jaahid Mulani, Sidharth Pant, Venkatesh Pai, Sadhna Kannan, Kedar Deodhar, Manjunath Nookala Krishnamurthy, Santosh Menon, Mayuri Charnalia, Sneha Shah, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Vikram Gota, Lavanya Naidu, Sheela Sawant, Praffula Thakkar, Palak Popat, Jaya Ghosh, Sushmita Rath, Seema Gulia, Reena Engineer, Umesh Mahantshetty, Sudeep Gupta, Supriya Chopra, Jayant Sastri Goda, Prachi Mittal, Jaahid Mulani, Sidharth Pant, Venkatesh Pai, Sadhna Kannan, Kedar Deodhar, Manjunath Nookala Krishnamurthy, Santosh Menon, Mayuri Charnalia, Sneha Shah, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Vikram Gota, Lavanya Naidu, Sheela Sawant, Praffula Thakkar, Palak Popat, Jaya Ghosh, Sushmita Rath, Seema Gulia, Reena Engineer, Umesh Mahantshetty, Sudeep Gupta

Abstract

Introduction: In locally advanced cervical cancer, nodal, local and distant relapse continue to be significant patterns of relapse. Therefore, strategies to improve the efficacy of chemoradiation are desirable such as biological pathway modifiers and immunomodulating agents. This trial will investigate the impact of nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor that targets the protein kinase B (AKT) pathway on disease-free survival (DFS).

Methods and analysis: Radiosensitising effect of nelfinavir in locally advanced carcinoma of cervix is a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomised phase-III study. Patients aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of carcinoma cervix stage III are eligible for the study. After consenting, patients will undergo randomisation to chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm or nelfinavir with chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm. The primary aim of the study is to compare the difference in 3-year DFS between the two arms. Secondary aims are locoregional control, overall survival, toxicity and quality of life between the two arms. Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its impact on tumour AKT, programmed cell death ligand 1, cluster of differentiation 4, cluster of differentiation 8 and natural killer 1.1 expression will be investigated. The overall sample size of 348 with 1 planned interim analysis achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a HR of 0.66 when the proportion surviving in the control arm is 0.65. The planned study duration is 8 years.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial is approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee-I of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai (reference number: IEC/0317/1543/001) and will be monitored by the data safety monitoring committee. The study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conference presentations. Study participants will be accrued after obtaining written informed consent from them. The confidentiality and privacy of study participants will be maintained.

Trial registration number: The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/08/009265) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03256916).

Keywords: adult radiotherapy; chemotherapy; gynaecological oncology; radiation oncology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure depicting the workflow of the clinical trial. At baseline patients undergo (A) MRI of the pelvis and (B) positron emission tomography (PET) scan for clinical staging. Additional research biopsy is obtained for performing immunohistochemistry (C, D). Following this patients are started on allocated intervention. Panel E and F demonstrate the clinical treatment provided to the patients with radiation along with weekly concurrent cisplatin following which patients undergo image guided brachytherapy. Panel E and F depicts the brachytherapy procedure and imaging. P-Akt, phosphorylation of protein kinase B.RT, radiotherapy; PK, pharmacokinetic; BT, brachytherapy.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660
    1. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. . Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1137–43. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401501
    1. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. . Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage Ib cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1999;340:1154–61. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401503
    1. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. . Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1999;340:1144–53. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502
    1. Shrivastava S, Mahantshetty U, Engineer R, et al. . Cisplatin chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy in FIGO stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:506–13. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5179
    1. Raut A, Chopra S, Mittal P, et al. . Figo classification 2018: validation study in patients with locally advanced cervix cancer treated with chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020;108:1248–56. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.020
    1. Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, et al. . Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2016;120:428–33. 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.011
    1. Tan L-T, Pötter R, Sturdza A, et al. . Change in patterns of failure after image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: analysis from the RetroEMBRACE study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019;104:895–902. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.038
    1. Mahantshetty U, Krishnatry R, Hande V, et al. . Magnetic resonance image guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: an experience from a tertiary cancer center in a low and middle income countries setting. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017;99:608–17. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.010
    1. Pötter R, Dimopoulos J, Georg P, et al. . Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007;83:148–55. 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.012
    1. Lindegaard JC, Fokdal LU, Nielsen SK, et al. . Mri-Guided adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer from a Nordic perspective. Acta Oncol 2013;52:1510–9. 10.3109/0284186X.2013.818253
    1. Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIb squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1548–55. 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985
    1. Kenter G, Greggi S, Vergote I, et al. . Results from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemoradiation for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer, EORTC 55994. JCO 2019;37:5503. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.5503
    1. University College, London . Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiation as first-line treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (INTERLACE). Available:
    1. Mileshkin LR, Narayan K, Moore KN, et al. . A phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone: the outback trial. JCO 2012;30:TPS5116. 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.tps5116
    1. Dueñas-González A, Zarbá JJ, Patel F, et al. . Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIb to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1678–85. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9663
    1. Horeweg N, Mittal P, Gradowska PL, et al. . Adjuvant systemic therapy after chemoradiation and brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2021;13:1880. 10.3390/cancers13081880
    1. AstraZeneca . Study of Durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy for women with locally advanced cervical cancer (CALLA) (CALLA). Available:
    1. Sharp M, Corp D. Study of chemoradiotherapy with or without pembrolizumab (MK-3475) for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (MK-3475 A18/KEYNOTE-A18/ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047). Available:
    1. . Available:
    1. Ma YY, Wei SJ, Lin YC, et al. . Pik3Ca as an oncogene in cervical cancer. Oncogene 2000;19:2739–44. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203597
    1. Arcaro A, Guerreiro A. "The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in human cancer: genetic alterations and therapeutic implications.". Curr Genomics 2007;8:271–306. 10.2174/138920207782446160
    1. Li B, Yuan M, Kim I-A, et al. . Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor displays increased signaling through the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt pathway and promotes radioresistance in cells of astrocytic origin. Oncogene 2004;23:4594–602. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207602
    1. Zheng L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. . Mir-106B induces cell radioresistance via the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathways and p21 in colorectal cancer. J Transl Med 2015;13:1–13. 10.1186/s12967-015-0592-z
    1. Gupta AK, McKenna WG, Weber CN, et al. . Local recurrence in head and neck cancer: relationship to radiation resistance and signal transduction. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:885–92.
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Analytical Biological Services, et al. . Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature 2017;543:378–84. 10.1038/nature21386
    1. Ojesina AI, Lichtenstein L, Freeman SS, et al. . Landscape of genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas. Nature 2014;506:371–5. 10.1038/nature12881
    1. Scholl S, Popovic M, de la Rochefordiere A, et al. . Clinical and genetic landscape of treatment naive cervical cancer: alterations in PIK3CA and in epigenetic modulators associated with sub-optimal outcome. EBioMedicine 2019;43:253–60. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.069
    1. Storch CH, Theile D, Lindenmaier H, et al. . Comparison of the inhibitory activity of anti-HIV drugs on P-glycoprotein. Biochem Pharmacol 2007;73:1573–81. 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.027
    1. Gupta AK, Li B, Cerniglia GJ, et al. . The HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir downregulates Akt phosphorylation by inhibiting proteasomal activity and inducing the unfolded protein response. Neoplasia 2007;9:271–8. 10.1593/neo.07124
    1. Xie L, Evangelidis T, Xie L, et al. . Drug discovery using chemical systems biology: weak inhibition of multiple kinases may contribute to the anti-cancer effect of nelfinavir. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002037.:44–6. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002037
    1. Brunner TB, Geiger M, Grabenbauer GG, et al. . Phase I trial of the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir and chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2699–706. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2355
    1. Rengan R, Mick R, Pryma D, et al. . A phase I trial of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer: a report of toxicities and clinical response. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:709–15. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182435aa6
    1. Rengan R, Mick R, Pryma DA, et al. . Clinical outcomes of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1/2 trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1464–72. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2095
    1. Buijsen J, Lammering G, Jansen RLH, et al. . Phase I trial of the combination of the Akt inhibitor nelfinavir and chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2013;107:184–8. 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.023
    1. Wilson JM, Fokas E, Dutton SJ, et al. . ARCII: a phase II trial of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir in combination with chemoradiation for locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2016;119:306–11. 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.021
    1. Lin C, Verma V, Ly QP, et al. . Phase I trial of concurrent stereotactic body radiotherapy and nelfinavir for locally advanced borderline or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2019;132:55–62. 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.002
    1. Garcia-Soto AE, McKenzie ND, Whicker ME, et al. . Phase 1 trial of nelfinavir added to standard cisplatin chemotherapy with concurrent pelvic radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer 2021;127:2279–93. 10.1002/cncr.33449
    1. Mittal P, Chopra S, Pant S, et al. . Standard chemoradiation and conventional brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: is it still applicable in the era of magnetic resonance-based brachytherapy? J Glob Oncol 2018;4:1–9. 10.1200/JGO.18.00028

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever