Real-time improvement of continuous glucose monitoring accuracy: the smart sensor concept

Andrea Facchinetti, Giovanni Sparacino, Stefania Guerra, Yoeri M Luijf, J Hans DeVries, Julia K Mader, Martin Ellmerer, Carsten Benesch, Lutz Heinemann, Daniela Bruttomesso, Angelo Avogaro, Claudio Cobelli, AP@home Consortium, Andrea Facchinetti, Giovanni Sparacino, Stefania Guerra, Yoeri M Luijf, J Hans DeVries, Julia K Mader, Martin Ellmerer, Carsten Benesch, Lutz Heinemann, Daniela Bruttomesso, Angelo Avogaro, Claudio Cobelli, AP@home Consortium

Abstract

Objective: Reliability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors is key in several applications. In this work we demonstrate that real-time algorithms can render CGM sensors smarter by reducing their uncertainty and inaccuracy and improving their ability to alert for hypo- and hyperglycemic events.

Research design and methods: The smart CGM (sCGM) sensor concept consists of a commercial CGM sensor whose output enters three software modules, able to work in real time, for denoising, enhancement, and prediction. These three software modules were recently presented in the CGM literature, and here we apply them to the Dexcom SEVEN Plus continuous glucose monitor. We assessed the performance of the sCGM on data collected in two trials, each containing 12 patients with type 1 diabetes.

Results: The denoising module improves the smoothness of the CGM time series by an average of ∼57%, the enhancement module reduces the mean absolute relative difference from 15.1 to 10.3%, increases by 12.6% the pairs of values falling in the A-zone of the Clarke error grid, and finally, the prediction module forecasts hypo- and hyperglycemic events an average of 14 min ahead of time.

Conclusions: We have introduced and implemented the sCGM sensor concept. Analysis of data from 24 patients demonstrates that incorporation of suitable real-time signal processing algorithms for denoising, enhancement, and prediction can significantly improve the performance of CGM applications. This can be of great clinical impact for hypo- and hyperglycemic alert generation as well in artificial pancreas devices.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The sCGM sensor architecture comprises a commercial CGM sensor (black block) and three software modules for denoising, enhancement, and prediction applied in cascade and working in real time. The denoising module receives in input CGM data and returns in output a smoother CGM profile. The enhancement module receives in input the smoothed CGM data and returns in output more accurate CGM data. Finally, the prediction module receives in input denoised and enhanced CGM data and returns in output the prediction of future glucose value, on which “preventive” hypo- and hyperglycemic alerts can be generated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of the application of three modules for the sCGM sensor in three representative subjects. A: The denoised output of the sCGM sensor (black line) is compared with raw CGM data (gray line). B: The enhanced output of the sCGM sensor (black line) and raw CGM data (gray line) is compared with reference BG values (gray circles). C: The real-time prediction (black line) obtained from the sCGM output (gray line), the alerts generated by crossing the hypoglycemic threshold (black and gray arrows, respectively) and the temporal gain in forecasting these events thanks to prediction are shown. Note that the time scales on the x-axis of the three panels are different.

References

    1. Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1231–1239
    1. McGarraugh G. The chemistry of commercial continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11(Suppl. 1):S17–S24
    1. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DIRECNET) Study Group The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:781–789
    1. Deiss D, Bolinder J, Riveline JP, et al. Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2730–2732
    1. Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, Nimri R, Oskarsson P, Bolinder J. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:795–800
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1464–1476
    1. McGarraugh G, Bergenstal R. Detection of hypoglycemia with continuous interstitial and traditional blood glucose monitoring using the FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:145–150
    1. Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al. STAR 3 Study Group Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:311–320
    1. Hermanides J, Nørgaard K, Bruttomesso D, et al. Sensor-augmented pump therapy lowers HbA(1c) in suboptimally controlled Type 1 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2011;28:1158–1167
    1. Garg S, Brazg RL, Bailey TS, et al. Reduction in duration of hypoglycemia by automatic suspension of insulin delivery: the in-clinic ASPIRE study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:205–209
    1. Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B. Artificial pancreas: past, present, future. Diabetes 2011;60:2672–2682
    1. Sparacino G, Facchinetti A, Cobelli C. “Smart” continuous glucose monitoring sensors: on-line signal processing issues. Sensors (Basel) 2010;10:6751–6772
    1. Bequette BW. Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2010;4:404–418
    1. Chase JG, Hann CE, Jackson M, et al. Integral-based filtering of continuous glucose sensor measurements for glycaemic control in critical care. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;82:238–247
    1. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. An online self-tunable method to denoise CGM sensor data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57:634–641
    1. Palerm CC, Willis JP, Desemone J, Bequette BW. Hypoglycemia prediction and detection using optimal estimation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:3–14
    1. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Online denoising method to handle intraindividual variability of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous glucose monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:2664–2671
    1. Aussedat B, Dupire-Angel M, Gifford R, Klein JC, Wilson GS, Reach G. Interstitial glucose concentration and glycemia: implications for continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000;278:E716–E728
    1. Rossetti P, Bondia J, Vehí J, Fanelli CG. Estimating plasma glucose from interstitial glucose: the issue of calibration algorithms in commercial continuous glucose monitoring devices. Sensors (Basel) 2010;10:10936–10952
    1. King C, Anderson SM, Breton M, Clarke WL, Kovatchev BP. Modeling of calibration effectiveness and blood-to-interstitial glucose dynamics as potential confounders of the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors during hyperinsulinemic clamp. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2007;1:317–322
    1. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Reconstruction of glucose in plasma from interstitial fluid continuous glucose monitoring data: role of sensor calibration. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2007;1:617–623
    1. Knobbe EJ, Buckingham B. The extended Kalman filter for continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:15–27
    1. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Enhanced accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring by online extended kalman filtering. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:353–363
    1. Barceló-Rico F, Bondia J, Díez JL, Rossetti P. A multiple local models approach to accuracy improvement in continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:74–82
    1. Guerra S, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Nicolao GD, Cobelli C. Enhancing the accuracy of subcutaneous glucose sensors: a real-time deconvolution-based approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:1658–1669
    1. Sparacino G, Zanderigo F, Corazza S, Maran A, Facchinetti A, Cobelli C. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:931–937
    1. Gani A, Gribok AV, Rajaraman S, Ward WK, Reifman J. Predicting subcutaneous glucose concentration in humans: data-driven glucose modeling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:246–254
    1. Eren-Oruklu M, Cinar A, Quinn L, Smith D. Estimation of future glucose concentrations with subject-specific recursive linear models. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:243–253
    1. Pérez-Gandía C, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, et al. Artificial neural network algorithm for online glucose prediction from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:81–88
    1. Dassau E, Cameron F, Lee H, et al. Real-Time hypoglycemia prediction suite using continuous glucose monitoring: a safety net for the artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1249–1254
    1. Pappada SM, Cameron BD, Rosman PM, et al. Neural network-based real-time prediction of glucose in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:135–141
    1. Zecchin C, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, De Nicolao G, Cobelli C. Neural network incorporating meal information improves accuracy of short-time prediction of glucose concentration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:1550–1560
    1. Artificial Pancreas (AP) at home. Available from Accessed 6 April 2012.
    1. Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, Trifoglio E, Cobelli C. A new index to optimally design and compare continuous glucose monitoring glucose prediction algorithms. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:111–119
    1. Kovatchev B, Anderson S, Heinemann L, Clarke W. Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1160–1164
    1. Clarke W, Kovatchev B. Statistical tools to analyze continuous glucose monitor data. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11(Suppl. 1):S45–S54
    1. Garg SK, Smith J, Beatson C, Lopez-Baca B, Voelmle M, Gottlieb PA. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:65–72
    1. Keenan DB, Mastrototaro JJ, Zisser H, et al. Accuracy of the Enlite 6-day glucose sensor with guardian and Veo calibration algorithms. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:225–231

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever